|
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#232
October 21st 05, 05:12 AM
|
|||
|
|||
Malloy digest, volume 2453665
"Totally unorganized" and "total flake" Joe Malloy writes:
Kook^6, "Unimpress[ive]" and "jerk" Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim, laced with invective, as expected from someone who lacks a logical argument. thole and tholes some mo How does one allegedly endure and endure some more when writing, Malloy? I grow weary of negating your claims, Tholen, Too bad you don't include any substantiation to go along with your repeated negations, Malloy. As for your weariness, that's your problem, Malloy. There is a rather simple solution, but you're obviously unable to figure it out. No surprise there, really. so I'm going to answer all your "Classic..." claims he poppycock. Illogical, given the lack of substantiation from you, Malloy, which justifies my claim that your claims are unsubstantiated, and contradicts your claim of poppycock. How does one earn the non-distinction of 6 (SIX!) Kook awards, Tholen? If you had better reading comprehension skills, Malloy, you'd already know that you should ask someone who has done so, Malloy; I have not. I see that you failed to answer my question, Malloy. No surprise there, really. Unless you're really stupid, Tholen, you can figure it out. I see that you've failed once again to answer my question, Malloy. No surprise there, really. Please point out your alleged "truth", Tholen. Been there, done that, Malloy, which you'd know by now if you had better reading comprehension skills. Ah, yes, this too I'm going to answer just this once and that answer is applicable to all your false claims of "reading comprehension problems", Tholen: balderdash. Classic erroneous presupposition of "false claims", Malloy. The fact that you keep asking questions that have already been answered proves that you have reading comprehension problems, Malloy. I have, Tholen, Then quit bothering me with your question, Malloy. If you had better reading comprehension skills, you would have already comprehended the answer from the person you asked. yet you refuse to answer, Illogical, given that I'm not in a position to answer your question, Malloy, as I have already told you several times, which you would know by now if you had better reading comprehension skills. claiming instead that you haven't when you clearly have, Tholen. Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim. Still suffering from hallucinations, eh Malloy? Of course, you have been lying before and you continue to do so, Tholen Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim. Having punctuation problems now, Malloy? So you claim, Tholen, but not as "peculiar" as your notion of the truth, Tholen. Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim. Illogical Tholen. Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim. Sure you do, Tholen, sure you do. Illogical, Malloy, given that you haven't answered my questions, and I cannot read your mind. As the Germans say, doch. What the Germans say is irrelevant, Malloy. It's simply a fact that no astrologers are involved, unless you intend to admit to being an astrologer. Ah, another mindless comment by Tholen: I see that you're still suffering from reading comprehension problems, Malloy, given that I didn't make a comment, but rather asked you a question, one that you failed to answer, yet again. No surprise there, really. I'll answer all of them with: What does your question have to do with Os/2, Tholen? That's not an answer to my question, Malloy. Still suffering from reading comprehension problems? Irrelevant, since you are lying, Tholen. Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim. I happen to be seated, Malloy. Mutatis mutandis Os/2, Tholen. I see that you are still not prepared to explain the relevance of your question to classical music, Malloy. No surprise there, really. Yes, they will be, should I happen to have one, Tholen. Too late, Malloy; you've already had several false impressions. Should anyone care to know, Tholen, I'll tell them, although I doubt there is anyone stupid enough to ask, Tholen. What you doubt is irrelevant, Malloy. What you think is irrelevant, Tholen. You're erroneously presupposing that I said anything about what I think, Malloy. Of course, you would know that by now if you had better reading comprehension skills. I have done so when I was young, Tholen, Try doing it now, Malloy. and it took. Of course, in your case, it *didn't* take, Illogical, given that there is no reason why I should practice what you preach, Malloy. obviously, so I can understand why you think saying that is logical, Tholen. It isn't, Tholen. On what basis do you claim that it isn't logical to tell someone to practice what they preach, Malloy? Conversely, are you saying that it is logical for someone to act hypocritically, Malloy? False, Tholen, Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim, given that I was indeed talking about your postings, Malloy. I was commenting on your posting, Tholen. Which is a non sequitur, given that I wasn't talking about my posting, Malloy. That's a claim you are clearly unprepared to substantiate, Tholen. On the contrary, I've substantiated it several times already, Malloy, which you would know by now if you had better reading comprehension skills. Try comprehending the substantiation this time, Malloy: http://www.ratemyprofessor.com/ShowR...jsp?tid=207980 What a card you are, Tholen! Non sequitur. The issue is your total "unorganization", Malloy. *You're* the one who seeks to deflect evidence for your imperial kookery, Tholen. Classic erroneous presupposition of evidence. Very good, Tholen! We may teach you to recognize English yet! Who are you speaking for when you say "we", Malloy? Certainly you can't include yourself, given that you're the one who wrote the ungrammatical English. Yes, and I'm still waiting. No you're not, Malloy; of course, you would know that by now if you had better reading comprehension skills. http://www.ratemyprofessor.com/ShowR...jsp?tid=207980 By the way, "exidence" is an improperly formed word, Tholen. What does that have to do with classical music, Malloy? I see that you didn't address any of the rest of the issues raised, Malloy. No surprise there, really. Apparently you're too embarrassed to see the evidence at www.dictionary.com that you've misused "thole". Apparently you're too embarrassed to realize that someone who hasn't been involved in a thread can't add newsgroups to the distribution. Of course, if you still disagree, then you had better start checking all of USENET for threads where you've added newsgroups to the distribution, even those threads where you haven't been involved, Malloy. After all, if it can happen to one person, then it can happen to another such as yourself, Malloy. By the way, how is your course in Semiotic Decoupage coming along? Or are finally willing to admit to fraudulent entries? 
|
|
#233
October 22nd 05, 05:05 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Tholen digest, volume 2453665.3365^-0.11
Kook^7, "Unimpress[ive]" and "jerk" tholed:
By the way, Tholen, non-congratulations on your latest Kook Award! Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim, laced with invective, as expected from someone who lacks a logical argument. Same deal as the last time, folks. If His Tholenship can't be bothered with accurate summations of the position about which he is responding, well, I won't deal with his stupid responses. Suffice it to say, his "lassic" claims are all claptrap. How does one allegedly endure and endure some more when writing, Malloy? How does one earn the uncoveted Kook award seven (7!) times, Tholen? Too bad you don't include any substantiation to go along with your repeated negations, Malloy. Substantiation has been provided, but naturally you cover that fact up, Tholen. They're lost in the mists of time, I suppose, Tholen, but you *could* find them if you knew how to use Google, Tholen. But, alas, you won't and don't, Tholen. As for your weariness, that's your problem, Malloy. If you wish to claim that I said it is your problem, you'll fail, Tholen. There is a rather simple solution, but you're obviously unable to figure it out. No surprise there, really. Yes, there is a rather simple solution, but you're obviously unable to figure it out, Tholen. No surprise there, really, Tholen. Illogical, given the lack of substantiation from you, Malloy The substantiations have been provided but unfortunately they're been buried by a mountain of your claptrap, Tholen. which justifies my claim that your claims are unsubstantiated, and contradicts your claim of poppycock. It does nothing of the kind, Tholen; a reader, a *normal* reader who understands what he writes, will see the emptiness of your misguided claim, Tholen. If you had better reading comprehension skills, Malloy, you'd already know that you should ask someone who has done so, Malloy; I have not. I see that you failed to answer my question, Malloy. No surprise there, really. And here you are with another false claim, Tholen. You *have* won those kook awards and thus I'm asking the right person to explain *how* one wins seven (7!) kook awards, Tholen. I see that you've failed once again to answer my question, Malloy. No surprise there, really. I see you really *are* stupid, Tholen; thanks for the admission, though there no surprise there, really, Tholen. Been there, done that, Malloy, which you'd know by now if you had better reading comprehension skills. Been there, done that, Tholen, which you'd know by now if you had some reading comprehension skills. Ah, yes, this too I'm going to answer just this once and that answer is applicable to all your false claims of "reading comprehension problems", Tholen: balderdash. Classic erroneous presupposition of "false claims", Malloy. Prove it, if you think you can, Tholen. The fact that you keep asking questions that have already been answered proves that you have reading comprehension problems, Malloy. Yawn. The fact that you keep asking questions that have already been answered to death proves that you have reading comprehension problems, Tholen.. Then quit bothering me with your question, Malloy. Yet you respond to statements or questions I make, Tholen. Now, why is that so, Tholen? What are you afraid of, Tholen? What the Germans say is irrelevant, Malloy. It's simply a fact that no astrologers are involved, unless you intend to admit to being an astrologer. I don't think so, Tholen. Your self-willed ignorance is noted, though, Tholen. I'll answer all of them with: What does your question have to do with Os/2, Tholen? That's not an answer to my question, Malloy. Wowie zowie, Tholen, you *can* learn a thing or two! But it is an answer to your questions -- brought out when you are trapped -- of a similar vein, Tholen. And you will not answer the simple question: What does your question have to do with Os/2, Tholen? Mutatis mutandis Os/2, Tholen. I see that you are still not prepared to explain the relevance of your question to classical music, Malloy. No surprise there, really. Sancta simplicitas! I answer the question with a simple, common Latin phrase and Tholen says I don't answer the question! What a goof he is! Too late, Malloy; you've already had several false impressions. *You're* accusing me of having false impressions like you have about me is pot, kettle, a shade of dark charcoal, Tholen. You're erroneously presupposing that I said anything about what I think, Malloy. Of course, you would know that by now if you had better reading comprehension skills. Ha, ha! You're so funny Tho...oh, wait, you haven't thought during all this time responding to me? Well, that would explain it, Tholen. Try doing it now, Malloy. Don't worry your [...!], Tholen, and do try to do it as well, Tholen. On what basis do you claim that it isn't logical to tell someone to practice what they preach, Malloy? When they are already doing so, Tholen. It's redundant, which means it's a waste of my time, Tholen. Conversely, are you saying that it is logical for someone to act hypocritically, Malloy? Stupidly, are you claiming I said that, Tholen? Which is a non sequitur, given that I wasn't talking about my posting, Malloy. In that posting to you never gets anywhere due to your dilatory and sempiternal "writing" habit, Tholen, nothing is non sequitur when addressed to you, Tholen. On the contrary, I've substantiated it several times already, Malloy, which you would know by now if you had better reading comprehension skills. Try comprehending the substantiation this time, Malloy: http://www.ratemyprofessor.com/ShowR...jsp?tid=525280 "Unimpress[ive]" and a "jerk" are what I see in your comments, Tholen. That's right on! Non sequitur. The issue is your total "unorganization", Malloy. And we're all waiting with baited breath for your first-hand proof of this allegation, Tholen. I predict: we'll all be disappointed with Tholen, Tholen. Who are you speaking for when you say "we", Malloy? Why, every single last user of your uselessnet, Tholen. Certainly you can't include yourself, given that you're the one who wrote the ungrammatical English. But I can make typographical errors and, yes, even *admit* to them, Tholen, which is something you're incapable of doing, Tholen. No you're not, Malloy There he goes again, stating that of which he has no proof and no evidence! Gee, that Tholen sure can tholenize! By the way, "exidence" is an improperly formed word, Tholen. What does that have to do with classical music, Malloy? See what I mean, gentle reader (that let's you out, Tholen) -- a typo and a refusal to accept the fact that he made it. Instead he seeks via misdirection to change the subject. That's Tholen for ya' -- ya' gotta love him! (Actually, it's fortunate that you have to do nothing of the kind shudder.) I see that you didn't address any of the rest of the issues raised, Malloy. You're fooling your [...!] if you think any "issues" have been raised by either you or me, Tholen. This is a ****ing match to you, I take it, and I'm just ****ing in your direction, if you will, Tholen. Semiotic Decoupage is coming along frightfully well, by the by; thanks for thinking such a course exists, Tholen. Toodles! -- Tholen showing off: "I am capable of using a web browser to examine a schedule of classes, Malloy."
|
|
#234
October 23rd 05, 04:24 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Malloy digest, volume 2453667
"Totally unorganized" and "total flake" Joe Malloy writes:
Kook^7, "Unimpress[ive]" and "jerk" Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim, laced with invective, as expected from someone who lacks a logical argument. tholed: How does one allegedly endure when writing, Malloy? By the way, Tholen, non-congratulations on your latest Kook Award! Classic erroneous presupposition that I've won any "Kook Award", Malloy. Same deal as the last time, folks. If His Tholenship can't be bothered with accurate summations of the position about which he is responding, Classic erroneous presupposition that your summations are accurate, Malloy. well, I won't deal with his stupid responses. Classic erroneous presupposition that my responses are stupid, Malloy. You're just trying to rationalize your inability to offer any logical responses to my questions. Suffice it to say, his "lassic" claims are all claptrap. Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim. How does one earn the uncoveted Kook award seven (7!) times, Tholen? As I've told you several times, Malloy, as you would know by now if you had decent reading comprehension skills, ask somebody who has done so; I have not. I see that you didn't answer my question, Malloy. No surprise there, really. Substantiation has been provided, Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim. but naturally you cover that fact up, Tholen. Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim. They're lost in the mists of time, I suppose, Tholen, What you suppose is irrelevant, Malloy; what you can prove is relevant. but you *could* find them if you knew how to use Google, Tholen. You're erroneously presupposing that they exist, Malloy. But, alas, you won't and don't, Tholen. You're still erroneously presupposing that they exist, Malloy. If you wish to claim that I said it is your problem, you'll fail, Tholen. The key word here is "if", Malloy. It's your weariness, it's your statement, and it's your problem, Malloy. The solution remains oh so simple, but not surprisingly, you still haven't figured it out. Yes, there is a rather simple solution, but you're obviously unable to figure it out, Tholen. Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim. On the contrary, I figured out the solution to your problem of weariness long ago, Malloy, but unfortunately, I can't implement the solution for you. You have to do that yourself. No surprise there, really, Tholen. That you would make yet another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim is indeed no surprise, Malloy. The substantiations have been provided Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim. but unfortunately they're been buried by a mountain of your claptrap, Tholen. Classic erroneous presupposition of "claptrap" from me, Malloy. Rather ironic, coming from someone who keeps posting claptrap in the form of his unsubstantiated and erroneous claims. It does nothing of the kind, Tholen; Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim. a reader, a *normal* reader who understands what he writes, will see the emptiness of your misguided claim, Tholen. Classic erroneous presupposition that my claim is misguided, Malloy. A true "normal reader" can see that your claims are unsubstantiated. And here you are with another false claim, Tholen. Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim. You *have* won those kook awards Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim. and thus I'm asking the right person to explain *how* one wins seven (7!) kook awards, Tholen. Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim. I see you really *are* stupid, Tholen; I see that you are still hallucinating, Malloy. thanks for the admission, I see that you are still hallucinating, Malloy. though there no surprise there, really, Tholen. That's not even grammatical, Malloy. Rather ironic, coming from a language instructor. Been there, done that, Tholen, which you'd know by now if you had some reading comprehension skills. Non sequitur. Prove it, if you think you can, Tholen. You're the one who made the claim of "false claims" on my part, Malloy, therefore the burden of proof falls on your shoulders, not mine. Yawn. Still haven't figured out the solution for your weariness, eh Malloy? The fact that you keep asking questions that have already been answered to death proves that you have reading comprehension problems, Tholen.. Classic erroneous presupposition that you've answered all my questions, Malloy. Having more punctuation problems, Malloy? Yet you respond to statements or questions I make, Tholen. Why shouldn't I note that your claims are unsubstantiated, Malloy? Now, why is that so, Tholen? Why shouldn't I note that your claims are unsubstantiated, Malloy? What are you afraid of, Tholen? Classic erroneous presupposition that I'm afraid, Malloy. I don't think so, Tholen. What you think is irrelevant, Malloy; what you can prove is relevant. Your self-willed ignorance is noted, though, Tholen. Classic erroneous presupposition of ignorance. Wowie zowie, Tholen, you *can* learn a thing or two! That's also not an answer to my question, Malloy. No surprise that you would continue to evade the matter. But it is an answer to your questions Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim. -- brought out when you are trapped Classic erroneous presupposition that I have been trapped, Malloy. -- of a similar vein, Tholen. And you will not answer the simple question: What does your question have to do with Os/2, Tholen? That's still not an answer to my question, Malloy. No surprise that you would continue to evade the matter. Sancta simplicitas! I answer the question with a simple, common Latin phrase Classic erroneous presupposition that you answered the question, Malloy. and Tholen says I don't answer the question! With good reason, Malloy. While all answers are responses, not all responses are answers, Malloy. Your response did absolutely nothing to answer my question. From the first time that you expanded your harassment to include rec.music.classical, I have asked you what your postings have to do with classical music, and you still haven't answered that question. What a goof he is! Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim, laced with invective, as expected from someone who lacks a logical argument. *You're* accusing me of having false impressions like you have about me is pot, kettle, a shade of dark charcoal, Tholen. That's not even grammatical, Malloy. Rather ironic, coming from a language instructor. Ha, ha! You're so funny Tho...oh, wait, you haven't thought during all this time responding to me? What does your question have to do with classical music, Malloy? Well, that would explain it, Tholen. Classic ambiguity. Don't worry your [...!], Tholen, Having trouble finding the right word, Malloy? and do try to do it as well, Tholen. Why should I practice what you preach, Malloy, especially when you don't practice what you preach? When they are already doing so, Tholen. Irrelevant, given that you aren't, Malloy. It's redundant, Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim, given that you are not practicing what you preach, Malloy. which means it's a waste of my time, Tholen. There is a rather simple solution to your wasting of time, Malloy. Of course, you obviously haven't figured out what that solution is. No surprise there, really. Stupidly, are you claiming I said that, Tholen? I see that you didn't answer my question, Malloy. No surprise there, really. In that posting to you never gets anywhere due to your dilatory and sempiternal "writing" habit, Tholen, That's not even grammatical, Malloy. Rather ironic, coming from a language instructor. nothing is non sequitur when addressed to you, Tholen. Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim. "Unimpress[ive]" and a "jerk" are what I see in your comments, Tholen. Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim. Still having trouble identifying the fraudulent entries, eh Malloy? That's right on! Sort of like how you are "totally unorganized" and a "total flake", Malloy. And those aren't fraudulent entries. Tsk, tsk. And we're all waiting with baited breath for your first-hand proof of this allegation, Tholen. No you're not, Malloy. The URL has been presented many times, which you would know by now if you had better reading comprehension skills. Here it is again: http://www.ratemyprofessor.com/ShowR...jsp?tid=207980 I predict: we'll all be disappointed with Tholen, Tholen. Classic erroneous prediction. Why, every single last user of your uselessnet, Tholen. Classic erroneous presupposition of the existence of my "uselessnet", Malloy. But I can make typographical errors and, yes, even *admit* to them, Tholen, What you can do is irrelevant, Malloy; what you haven't done is relevant. which is something you're incapable of doing, Tholen. Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim. There he goes again, stating that of which he has no proof and no evidence! Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim. Gee, that Tholen sure can tholenize! Classic ambiguity. See what I mean, gentle reader (that let's you out, Tholen) I see that you didn't answer the question, Malloy. Again. No surprise there, really. -- a typo and a refusal to accept the fact that he made it. I see that you still suffering from hallucinations, Malloy, given that there was no refusal at all. Instead he seeks via misdirection to change the subject. Classic erroneous presupposition that I'm trying to change the subject, Malloy. The subject for the newsgroup rec.music.classical happens to be classical music, which is why I keep asking you what your postings have to do with classical music, which is a question that you still haven't answered. That subject hasn't changed at all. Of course, you would know that by now if you had better reading comprehension skills. That's Tholen for ya' -- ya' gotta love him! I see that you still didn't answer the question, Malloy. Again. No surprise there, really. (Actually, it's fortunate that you have to do nothing of the kind shudder.) I see that you still didn't answer the question, Malloy. Again. No surprise there, really. You're fooling your [...!] if you think any "issues" have been raised by either you or me, Tholen. Still having trouble finding the right word, Malloy? That you believe I haven't raised any issues is further evidence of your reading comprehension problem, Malloy. This is a ****ing match to you, I take it, Your take is irrelevant, Malloy. The fact of the matter is that I ignored you for the better part of two years as you continued to post your harassment in comp.os.os2.advocacy. But you couldn't resist expanded your antagonism to additional newsgroups, including rec.music.classical, where I have once again decided to stand my ground against your ongoing harassment. There is no ****ing match for me, Malloy; the fact that I ignored you for the better part of two years proves that beyond a shadow of a doubt. But you're simply too "unorganized" or too flat-out stupid to realize that. and I'm just ****ing in your direction, if you will, Tholen. You were already doing that when you ****ed into comp.os.os2.advocacy, Malloy. Now you've decided to soil several additional newsgroups with your ****. That you admit to ****ing speaks volumes, Malloy. Semiotic Decoupage is coming along frightfully well, by the by; thanks for thinking such a course exists, Tholen. It's not me who thinks the course exists, Malloy; I wanted to see your reaction to further evidence of fraudulent entries, and now I know what your reaction is. Toodles! Non sequitur. Tholen showing off: Also non sequitur.
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Blowhard Tholen | Blowhard Tholen | Astronomy Misc | 0 | April 7th 04 09:24 PM |
| Asshole Tholenizer | Asshole Tholenizer | Astronomy Misc | 1 | April 4th 04 06:56 AM |
| Wacky Tholenizer | Wacky Tholenlizer | Astronomy Misc | 0 | April 2nd 04 11:31 PM |
| Crazy Tholenizer | Crazy Tholenizer | Astronomy Misc | 0 | April 2nd 04 11:29 PM |
Linear Mode
