A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Astronomy and Astrophysics » Astronomy Misc
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Summary of Theory of Everything



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old April 4th 07, 11:13 PM posted to sci.physics,sci.physics.particle,sci.physics.relativity,sci.astro
[email protected]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1
Default Summary of Theory of Everything


You will note a problem here. Since the Earth is made of proton and
electrons, then a tiny charge asymmetry will produce a net charge of
one sign, as you say. However, the Moon is also made of protons and
electrons, and the same charge asymmetry will produce a net charge of
the same sign as the Earth. In your scenario, the Earth and the Moon
would then have the same sign of net charge, and if you recall
Coulomb's law, like charges repel. Thus you would predict that the
Earth repels the Moon, not attracts it.

To account for attraction via Coulomb's law, you would have to explain
how it is that the Moon and the Earth acquire opposite charge.
Likewise, you would also have to explain how the Sun and the Earth
acquire opposite charge. You will also note that it is difficult to
arrange the Sun and the Earth and the Moon all to have opposite
charges, so that at least one of those pairs would have to repel each
other, which is counter to experiment.

PD

[snip]


I think this recent post by Mitchell Jones neatly explains how an
electrostatic force generated by a slight difference between the
attraction of opposite charges versus the replusion of similar charges
can produce a gravity-like force. This isn't due to an imbalance
between the charge ratios of electrons/protons that would lead to an
overall imbalance of charges, but rather a difference in force when
considering the attractive force versus the repelling force generated
by charges. This is a pretty straight forward application of Columbs
law.

http://groups.google.com/group/sci.p...532d05a4ffd0a1

I used to think that there would be a net charge that generated the
field. A net charge does exist due to electrons blown off the Earth
and this generates the electric field, but this is not the main
mechanism behind gravity.

fhusummary

  #12  
Old April 5th 07, 04:32 AM posted to sci.physics,sci.physics.particle,sci.physics.relativity,sci.astro
Dr. V I Plankenstein
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2
Default Summary of Theory of Everything

I just do not believe that an electron is anything more, than a
spherical wave in the ether.



I like that idea. I like it alot.

So - what is aether ?


  #13  
Old April 5th 07, 01:25 PM posted to sci.physics,sci.physics.particle,sci.physics.relativity,sci.astro
PD
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,572
Default Summary of Theory of Everything

On Apr 4, 5:13 pm, wrote:
You will note a problem here. Since the Earth is made of proton and
electrons, then a tiny charge asymmetry will produce a net charge of
one sign, as you say. However, the Moon is also made of protons and
electrons, and the same charge asymmetry will produce a net charge of
the same sign as the Earth. In your scenario, the Earth and the Moon
would then have the same sign of net charge, and if you recall
Coulomb's law, like charges repel. Thus you would predict that the
Earth repels the Moon, not attracts it.


To account for attraction via Coulomb's law, you would have to explain
how it is that the Moon and the Earth acquire opposite charge.
Likewise, you would also have to explain how the Sun and the Earth
acquire opposite charge. You will also note that it is difficult to
arrange the Sun and the Earth and the Moon all to have opposite
charges, so that at least one of those pairs would have to repel each
other, which is counter to experiment.


PD


[snip]


I think this recent post by Mitchell Jones neatly explains how an
electrostatic force generated by a slight difference between the
attraction of opposite charges versus the replusion of similar charges
can produce a gravity-like force.


Mitchell Jones also mentions that there are numerous sound objections
to this conjecture, strong experimental evidence being among them.

Just because something can hang together *logically* is *not*
indicative of its truth. In the end, reconciliation against
experimental data is the determiner.

PD

This isn't due to an imbalance
between the charge ratios of electrons/protons that would lead to an
overall imbalance of charges, but rather a difference in force when
considering the attractive force versus the repelling force generated
by charges. This is a pretty straight forward application of Columbs
law.

http://groups.google.com/group/sci.p...532d05a4ffd0a1

I used to think that there would be a net charge that generated the
field. A net charge does exist due to electrons blown off the Earth
and this generates the electric field, but this is not the main
mechanism behind gravity.

fhusummary- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -



 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Summary of my Perseid Images Ian Sharp UK Astronomy 0 August 13th 05 02:48 PM
SUMMARY: X-ray Event exceeded M5 Sam Wormley Amateur Astronomy 0 July 13th 05 04:43 PM
NOT your Father's Satellite -- Summary [7] Painius Misc 12 June 23rd 05 01:25 PM
Bush Speech - AP Summary Andrew Gray Policy 6 January 15th 04 03:02 PM
Planets Summary from Heavens-Above Bill Tschumy Amateur Astronomy 2 August 25th 03 06:58 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:08 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.