|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
BH with Orbiting White dwarf
I think BH is three times more dense. Still their relative time must be a year to a second with Earth's time.I trying to think of a time that goes back into past time.Back to the future can only be done in a movie.Bert
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
BH with Orbiting White dwarf
On Wednesday, November 28, 2018 at 9:29:44 AM UTC-8, Herbert Glazier wrote:
I think BH is three times more dense. Still their relative time must be a year to a second with Earth's time.I trying to think of a time that goes back into past time.Back to the future can only be done in a movie.Bert Three White dwarfs in close orbit equal one BH.This was reality 18 billion LYs ago.Density was in the further back in time.Matter is losing thinning out as I type Bert |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
BH with Orbiting White dwarf
On Wednesday, November 28, 2018 at 1:42:16 PM UTC-6, Herbert Glazier wrote:
On Wednesday, November 28, 2018 at 9:29:44 AM UTC-8, Herbert Glazier wrote: I think BH is three times more dense. Still their relative time must be a year to a second with Earth's time.I trying to think of a time that goes back into past time.Back to the future can only be done in a movie.Bert Three White dwarfs in close orbit equal one BH.This was reality 18 billion LYs ago.Density was in the further back in time.Matter is losing thinning out as I type Bert To make a black hole the three white dwarves have to die first. And you will have to get everyone off of the orbiting planets. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
BH with Orbiting White dwarf
On Wednesday, November 28, 2018 at 3:36:52 PM UTC-8, Mark Earnest wrote:
On Wednesday, November 28, 2018 at 1:42:16 PM UTC-6, Herbert Glazier wrote: On Wednesday, November 28, 2018 at 9:29:44 AM UTC-8, Herbert Glazier wrote: I think BH is three times more dense. Still their relative time must be a year to a second with Earth's time.I trying to think of a time that goes back into past time.Back to the future can only be done in a movie.Bert Three White dwarfs in close orbit equal one BH.This was reality 18 billion LYs ago.Density was in the further back in time.Matter is losing thinning out as I type Bert To make a black hole the three white dwarves have to die first. And you will have to get everyone off of the orbiting planets. By their very definition, white dwarves are already dead. No fusion takes place in a white dwarf where mass is converted to energy. They only shine because of stored-up thermal energy. Any planets orbiting a white dwarf are also long dead, having been stripped of their atmospheres, there would not be anyone there to "get off". |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
BH with Orbiting White dwarf
On Wednesday, November 28, 2018 at 8:13:00 PM UTC-6, palsing wrote:
On Wednesday, November 28, 2018 at 3:36:52 PM UTC-8, Mark Earnest wrote: On Wednesday, November 28, 2018 at 1:42:16 PM UTC-6, Herbert Glazier wrote: On Wednesday, November 28, 2018 at 9:29:44 AM UTC-8, Herbert Glazier wrote: I think BH is three times more dense. Still their relative time must be a year to a second with Earth's time.I trying to think of a time that goes back into past time.Back to the future can only be done in a movie.Bert Three White dwarfs in close orbit equal one BH.This was reality 18 billion LYs ago.Density was in the further back in time.Matter is losing thinning out as I type Bert To make a black hole the three white dwarves have to die first. And you will have to get everyone off of the orbiting planets. By their very definition, white dwarves are already dead. No fusion takes place in a white dwarf where mass is converted to energy. They only shine because of stored-up thermal energy. Any planets orbiting a white dwarf are also long dead, having been stripped of their atmospheres, there would not be anyone there to "get off". White dwarves may be dead but they are not dead enough to become black holes. And it is possible that civilizations survived a star's red giant phase. When a star increases diameter so do the planets' orbits. You could figure all this out for yourself if you got your head out of the books long enough to use a little imagination. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
BH with Orbiting White dwarf
On Thursday, November 29, 2018 at 5:22:30 AM UTC-8, Mark Earnest wrote:
On Wednesday, November 28, 2018 at 8:13:00 PM UTC-6, palsing wrote: On Wednesday, November 28, 2018 at 3:36:52 PM UTC-8, Mark Earnest wrote: On Wednesday, November 28, 2018 at 1:42:16 PM UTC-6, Herbert Glazier wrote: On Wednesday, November 28, 2018 at 9:29:44 AM UTC-8, Herbert Glazier wrote: I think BH is three times more dense. Still their relative time must be a year to a second with Earth's time.I trying to think of a time that goes back into past time.Back to the future can only be done in a movie.Bert Three White dwarfs in close orbit equal one BH.This was reality 18 billion LYs ago.Density was in the further back in time.Matter is losing thinning out as I type Bert To make a black hole the three white dwarves have to die first. And you will have to get everyone off of the orbiting planets. By their very definition, white dwarves are already dead. No fusion takes place in a white dwarf where mass is converted to energy. They only shine because of stored-up thermal energy. Any planets orbiting a white dwarf are also long dead, having been stripped of their atmospheres, there would not be anyone there to "get off". White dwarves may be dead but they are not dead enough to become black holes. And it is possible that civilizations survived a star's red giant phase. When a star increases diameter so do the planets' orbits. You could figure all this out for yourself if you got your head out of the books long enough to use a little imagination. Reality is it can take 2 trillion years for a white hole to go black WOW.Bert |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
BH with Orbiting White dwarf
On Thursday, November 29, 2018 at 2:42:20 PM UTC-8, Herbert Glazier wrote:
On Thursday, November 29, 2018 at 5:22:30 AM UTC-8, Mark Earnest wrote: On Wednesday, November 28, 2018 at 8:13:00 PM UTC-6, palsing wrote: On Wednesday, November 28, 2018 at 3:36:52 PM UTC-8, Mark Earnest wrote: On Wednesday, November 28, 2018 at 1:42:16 PM UTC-6, Herbert Glazier wrote: On Wednesday, November 28, 2018 at 9:29:44 AM UTC-8, Herbert Glazier wrote: I think BH is three times more dense. Still their relative time must be a year to a second with Earth's time.I trying to think of a time that goes back into past time.Back to the future can only be done in a movie..Bert Three White dwarfs in close orbit equal one BH.This was reality 18 billion LYs ago.Density was in the further back in time.Matter is losing thinning out as I type Bert To make a black hole the three white dwarves have to die first. And you will have to get everyone off of the orbiting planets. By their very definition, white dwarves are already dead. No fusion takes place in a white dwarf where mass is converted to energy. They only shine because of stored-up thermal energy. Any planets orbiting a white dwarf are also long dead, having been stripped of their atmospheres, there would not be anyone there to "get off". White dwarves may be dead but they are not dead enough to become black holes. And it is possible that civilizations survived a star's red giant phase. When a star increases diameter so do the planets' orbits. You could figure all this out for yourself if you got your head out of the books long enough to use a little imagination. Reality is it can take 2 trillion years for a white hole to go black WOW.Bert Which would leave any civilizations there plenty of time to figure out how to move to a better location! Double-A |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
BH with Orbiting White dwarf
On Thursday, November 29, 2018 at 4:42:20 PM UTC-6, Herbert Glazier wrote:
On Thursday, November 29, 2018 at 5:22:30 AM UTC-8, Mark Earnest wrote: On Wednesday, November 28, 2018 at 8:13:00 PM UTC-6, palsing wrote: On Wednesday, November 28, 2018 at 3:36:52 PM UTC-8, Mark Earnest wrote: On Wednesday, November 28, 2018 at 1:42:16 PM UTC-6, Herbert Glazier wrote: On Wednesday, November 28, 2018 at 9:29:44 AM UTC-8, Herbert Glazier wrote: I think BH is three times more dense. Still their relative time must be a year to a second with Earth's time.I trying to think of a time that goes back into past time.Back to the future can only be done in a movie..Bert Three White dwarfs in close orbit equal one BH.This was reality 18 billion LYs ago.Density was in the further back in time.Matter is losing thinning out as I type Bert To make a black hole the three white dwarves have to die first. And you will have to get everyone off of the orbiting planets. By their very definition, white dwarves are already dead. No fusion takes place in a white dwarf where mass is converted to energy. They only shine because of stored-up thermal energy. Any planets orbiting a white dwarf are also long dead, having been stripped of their atmospheres, there would not be anyone there to "get off". White dwarves may be dead but they are not dead enough to become black holes. And it is possible that civilizations survived a star's red giant phase. When a star increases diameter so do the planets' orbits. You could figure all this out for yourself if you got your head out of the books long enough to use a little imagination. Reality is it can take 2 trillion years for a white hole to go black WOW.Bert Maybe add a little salt and pepper to what you say, Bert. Then we may understand. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
BH with Orbiting White dwarf
On Thursday, November 29, 2018 at 5:07:17 PM UTC-6, Double-A wrote:
On Thursday, November 29, 2018 at 2:42:20 PM UTC-8, Herbert Glazier wrote: On Thursday, November 29, 2018 at 5:22:30 AM UTC-8, Mark Earnest wrote: On Wednesday, November 28, 2018 at 8:13:00 PM UTC-6, palsing wrote: On Wednesday, November 28, 2018 at 3:36:52 PM UTC-8, Mark Earnest wrote: On Wednesday, November 28, 2018 at 1:42:16 PM UTC-6, Herbert Glazier wrote: On Wednesday, November 28, 2018 at 9:29:44 AM UTC-8, Herbert Glazier wrote: I think BH is three times more dense. Still their relative time must be a year to a second with Earth's time.I trying to think of a time that goes back into past time.Back to the future can only be done in a movie.Bert Three White dwarfs in close orbit equal one BH.This was reality 18 billion LYs ago.Density was in the further back in time.Matter is losing thinning out as I type Bert To make a black hole the three white dwarves have to die first. And you will have to get everyone off of the orbiting planets. By their very definition, white dwarves are already dead. No fusion takes place in a white dwarf where mass is converted to energy. They only shine because of stored-up thermal energy. Any planets orbiting a white dwarf are also long dead, having been stripped of their atmospheres, there would not be anyone there to "get off". White dwarves may be dead but they are not dead enough to become black holes. And it is possible that civilizations survived a star's red giant phase. When a star increases diameter so do the planets' orbits. You could figure all this out for yourself if you got your head out of the books long enough to use a little imagination. Reality is it can take 2 trillion years for a white hole to go black WOW.Bert Which would leave any civilizations there plenty of time to figure out how to move to a better location! It is easy to build space ships. We seem to be the only ones having difficulty with this. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
BH with Orbiting White dwarf
On Thursday, November 29, 2018 at 3:51:36 PM UTC-8, Mark Earnest wrote:
On Thursday, November 29, 2018 at 5:07:17 PM UTC-6, Double-A wrote: On Thursday, November 29, 2018 at 2:42:20 PM UTC-8, Herbert Glazier wrote: On Thursday, November 29, 2018 at 5:22:30 AM UTC-8, Mark Earnest wrote: On Wednesday, November 28, 2018 at 8:13:00 PM UTC-6, palsing wrote: On Wednesday, November 28, 2018 at 3:36:52 PM UTC-8, Mark Earnest wrote: On Wednesday, November 28, 2018 at 1:42:16 PM UTC-6, Herbert Glazier wrote: On Wednesday, November 28, 2018 at 9:29:44 AM UTC-8, Herbert Glazier wrote: I think BH is three times more dense. Still their relative time must be a year to a second with Earth's time.I trying to think of a time that goes back into past time.Back to the future can only be done in a movie.Bert Three White dwarfs in close orbit equal one BH.This was reality 18 billion LYs ago.Density was in the further back in time.Matter is losing thinning out as I type Bert To make a black hole the three white dwarves have to die first. And you will have to get everyone off of the orbiting planets. By their very definition, white dwarves are already dead. No fusion takes place in a white dwarf where mass is converted to energy. They only shine because of stored-up thermal energy. Any planets orbiting a white dwarf are also long dead, having been stripped of their atmospheres, there would not be anyone there to "get off". White dwarves may be dead but they are not dead enough to become black holes. And it is possible that civilizations survived a star's red giant phase. When a star increases diameter so do the planets' orbits. You could figure all this out for yourself if you got your head out of the books long enough to use a little imagination. Reality is it can take 2 trillion years for a white hole to go black WOW.Bert Which would leave any civilizations there plenty of time to figure out how to move to a better location! It is easy to build space ships. We seem to be the only ones having difficulty with this. No need to build space ships when we can convert comets.Bert |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
How long does it take a white dwarf to be a brown dwarf? | G=EMC^2[_2_] | Misc | 41 | January 11th 13 07:24 PM |
Two white dwarf stars orbiting each other every five minutes, confirmed | Yousuf Khan[_2_] | Astronomy Misc | 26 | March 22nd 10 03:54 AM |
After the sun becomes a white dwarf, how long will it take to become a black dwarf? | Radium[_2_] | Research | 3 | July 16th 07 10:53 PM |
White dwarf and ultra-cool dwarf keep their distance (Forwarded) | Andrew Yee | Astronomy Misc | 0 | April 24th 07 09:45 PM |
White dwarf and ultra-cool dwarf keep their distance (Forwarded) | Andrew Yee[_1_] | News | 0 | April 24th 07 08:57 PM |