|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
What if(on direction of anti-matter)
On Wednesday, January 7, 2015 at 10:29:23 AM UTC-8, G=EMC^2TreBert wrote:
Anti-matter + Anti-energy do not merge with one another because they are in continual motion going in the opposite direction.Like two opposite charges. I will add this into my "Concave & Convex" theory. My virtual friend AA gave me fuel for this What If TreBert AA Goes well how I see it.Posted for years how dynamic the vacuum of space is.Nothing is in reality everything.QM will not allow nothing.The universe is a place where we think has nothing is in reality filled with gravity field,and those particles you brought out. TreBert |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
What if(on direction of anti-matter)
On Sunday, January 25, 2015 at 9:55:10 AM UTC-8, HVAC wrote:
On 1/25/2015 10:38 AM, benj wrote: Of course. All kooks love anti-gravity. It's one of the reasons they will not accept the fact that gravity is merely space reacting to the presence of a mass. They concoct all sorts of bizarre 'theories' to try and double talk their way around this fact. I have even heard of kooks say that ether is the cause of gravity using 'etherons'. The fact that there is zero evidence for this doesn't slow them down. When Harlow says "zero evidence" he means that all evidence of this truth has been totally covered up by his ilk. His job is to cover up "anti-gravity" so you won't ask him when was the last time he took a ride in one of them anti-gravity gummint craft... ****! He's on to us. Delta Protocol now enabled. Lock and load, baby! Say, Harlow when WAS the last time you took a ride in an anty-gravity gummint craft? Oh thats right... categorically deny ....yada yada yada. Einstein really put a pin in the kook anti-gravity party balloon didn't he BJ? (I love to mix my metaphors) And you kooks hate him for it. He also holed the ether party balloon as well, but the anti-gravity balloon pop is what really is maddening to your average kook. Einstein never could get his head around black holes, or quantum uncertainty for that matter. I guess nobody's perfect. At least he wasn't gay. He always kept a wife around to beat on! Double-A |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
What if(on direction of anti-matter)
On Wednesday, January 7, 2015 at 10:29:23 AM UTC-8, G=EMC^2TreBert wrote:
Anti-matter + Anti-energy do not merge with one another because they are in continual motion going in the opposite direction.Like two opposite charges. I will add this into my "Concave & Convex" theory. My virtual friend AA gave me fuel for this What If TreBert AA Einstein hated QM. Never had the Cern.Big on space curving. When I spoke with Einstein I brought up that there was no question in my mind that inertia,and gravity were the same. His theories had great depth. Greater than he thought. TreBert |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Matter + Anti-Matter =Space Ship to the Stars | G=EMC^2[_2_] | Misc | 2 | July 30th 11 02:29 PM |
Matter + Anti-Matter =Space Ship to the Stars | G=EMC^2[_2_] | Misc | 2 | July 25th 11 03:55 PM |
Anti-Matter ,and Negative Matter are two Different Things O Ya | herbert glazier | Misc | 27 | March 11th 11 01:21 AM |
Anti Gavity Anti Matter Anti universe Treb & Bert = | bert | Misc | 5 | July 25th 10 01:40 PM |
Ooops Answering oc on matter and anti matter I forgot this. | G=EMC^2 Glazier[_1_] | Misc | 19 | February 15th 09 12:49 AM |