|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Entire NASA Safety Panel Resigns!
Rudolph_X :
Here are a few old links on the subject for those of you who may have forgotten about it: http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/articl...2/MN221641.DTL Yes, it says a digital camera at the top, and talks of developing film at the bottom. You call this trust-worthy? http://www.rense.com/general34/wow.htm Not only does this story sound very fishy, (everything is second or third hand info, with lots of stuffing that has nothing to do with the photo at the end). A photo with an exposure of 4-6 seconds is only going to show a blur of a fast moving object like the shuttle. Even tracking would not help with such a long dwell time because of the shuttle's movements. You going to have to do better than this. Earl Colby Pottinger -- I make public email sent to me! Hydrogen Peroxide Rockets, OpenBeos, SerialTransfer 3.0, RAMDISK, BoatBuilding, DIY TabletPC. What happened to the time? http://webhome.idirect.com/~earlcp |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Entire NASA Safety Panel Resigns!
Rudolph_X :
Shortly after the shuttle crashed, the Science Editor at the San Fransisco Chronicle ran a story that told of an amateur astromoner who had photographed what appeared to be a strange craggy "blue electrical bolt of energy" strinking the shuttle during its reentry into the atmosphere, while it was still over California. NASA got a hold of the digital camera and the memory chip that holds the digital photographs in its memory, and that is the last we (the public) ever heard about it. No mention was ever made of it during the investigation, and the photos were never released for viewing by the public. Still a lying Zetadrone I see. Look up the news reports, all of them either give a model number that is not a camera or claim that film (huh???) from a digital camera was given to NASA. No memory chip was ever mentioned in the orginal reports. Claims like that don't match reality, and the fact that you believe otherwise does not say anything good about you. Go ahead, find a report rght after the claim that was made that matchs your claim, You will not find any. When I said, strange 'alien death ray', I didn't mean that some aliens shot the shuttle down. What I meant is that the strange 'blue electrical bolt' that was photographed striking the shuttle was 'alien' to our understanding. As yet, no good explanation has been given as to what it was, or why NASA is refusing to release the photos to the general public. The question is why the person who orginally took the photos has not released them to the public? NASA reasons is simple, (1) They don't own the pictures the person who took them in the first place does, it is his choice about releasing the photos. (2). No matter what they say if they do the release, woo-woos like you will claim that proves NASA agrees with them. So why are you not asking the original photographer for pictures? Scared? Earl Colby Pottinger -- I make public email sent to me! Hydrogen Peroxide Rockets, OpenBeos, SerialTransfer 3.0, RAMDISK, BoatBuilding, DIY TabletPC. What happened to the time? http://webhome.idirect.com/~earlcp |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Entire NASA Safety Panel Resigns!
Wally Anglesea^(TM) wrote: On Thu, 25 Sep 2003 07:56:23 GMT, Rudolph_X wrote: Wally Anglesea^(TM) wrote: On Wed, 24 Sep 2003 01:21:19 GMT, Rudolph_X wrote: All along, I suspected that they did a 'white-wash', 'cover-up job' when they failed to mention the 'alien death ray' that struck the shuttle before it went down. Also, the photos of the 'blue electircal bolt' seen striking the shuttle just before it crashed, seem to have mysteriously disapeared. No one ever mentioned the photos, and the photos were never released for public viewing. What happened? A cover up? Congress, also, is not satisfied with panel's conclusions either. Something stinks in NASA! http://edition.cnn.com/2003/TECH/spa....ap/index.html Hey Rudolph, Why can't anyone find this fictitious NSA in St Petersburg? OK, So far, I've been told that *THERE IS NO NSA IN ST PETERSBURG, MUCH LESS A DEPT OF UFO RESEARCH, AND CERTAINLY NOT ONE THAT REPORTS TO PUTIN Looks like your sources were stoooooopppid again!!! -- For the Truth about Planet X, Phil Plait's excellent summary: http://www.badastronomy.com/bad/misc/planetx/index.html Did you hear the one about the Chinese lumberjack's x-rated ET encounter? Yeah, and I'll pu it in the skeptical basket till it gets investigated. Right now, I'm trying to verify your sources that claimed some non-eixistent Russian claims something about a UFO. Start making up your excuses now. Seems that Chinese also have a similar 'official' UFO governmental agency. Read the artice from Time magazine. http://www.time.com/time/asia/magazi...8900%2C00.html Now try and tell us that the official UFO governmental agency in China doesn't exist. No, you won't do that. (Just, watch folks, this is where NO, I'll get round to that one if I get the time. Right now, we are discussing your Russian claims. Wally turns into a heckler, avoids the issue and starts with his personal attacks.) Well, as far as you are concerned, it save a whole lot of time, nitwit. NO, I'm calling YOU, and your reliance on NEXUS. I'm not discussing China, I want you explanation of using a non existent RUSSIAN organisation to bolster you claims, nitwit. If you can't debunk the Chinese official governmental UFO agency, why should we believe that you can debunk the officical Russian UFO agency? Are you *really* that stupid? I guess you must be. You can say what you like, Wally. But, you should understand by now that people are different, in more ways than you can imagine. The great diversity of mankind is what helps to insure our survival as a species. We should celebrate our diversity, not condem other folks for being different from us. For example, in India, we have an official government minister taking a position similar to that taken by the Chinese, the Russians, and so many other governments throughout the world... http://www.rense.com/general42/indianministerscall.htm The human potential is virtually unlimited... What irks me about some of the debunkers on sci.astro is that they continually seek to belittle mankind's tremendous evolutionary potential. Wally, you need to learn how to 'think big'! |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Entire NASA Safety Panel Resigns!
"Rudolph_X" wrote in message ... snip [RX]You can say what you like, Wally. But, you should understand by now that people are different, in more ways than you can imagine. The great diversity of mankind is what helps to insure our survival as a species. We should celebrate our diversity, not condem other folks for being different from us. For example, in India, we have an official government minister taking a position similar to that taken by the Chinese, the Russians, and so many other governments throughout the world... http://www.rense.com/general42/indianministerscall.htm The human potential is virtually unlimited... What irks me about some of the debunkers on sci.astro is that they continually seek to belittle mankind's tremendous evolutionary potential. Wally, you need to learn how to 'think big'! Rudy, Yes, you make it clear with every post that you purposely post off-topic here. You were directed to the FAQ that outlined what is and what isn't on-topic on sci.astro; and I even reproduced the main element of it in a post to you. You, living in your own world, feel free to make up your own rules, and then expect people to abide by them. Now go away before I taunt you one more time. Tom McDonald remove 'nohormel' to reply |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Entire NASA Safety Panel Resigns!
On Sat, 27 Sep 2003 01:34:15 GMT, Rudolph_X
wrote: SNIP The human potential is virtually unlimited... What irks me about some of the debunkers on sci.astro is that they continually seek to belittle mankind's tremendous evolutionary potential. Wally, you need to learn how to 'think big'! You need to learn how to think. It loks like one of your sources is about to be shown up as stooooooopid. (nexus magazine of course) Again. -- For the Truth about Planet X, Phil Plait's excellent summary: http://www.badastronomy.com/bad/misc/planetx/index.html |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Unofficial Space Shuttle Launch Guide | Steven S. Pietrobon | Space Shuttle | 0 | August 5th 04 01:36 AM |
Unofficial Space Shuttle Launch Guide | Steven S. Pietrobon | Space Shuttle | 0 | April 2nd 04 12:01 AM |
Unofficial Space Shuttle Launch Guide | Steven S. Pietrobon | Space Shuttle | 0 | February 2nd 04 03:33 AM |
NASA Names New Safety Advisory Panel | Ron Baalke | Space Shuttle | 0 | November 18th 03 11:23 PM |
Unofficial Space Shuttle Launch Guide | Steven S. Pietrobon | Space Shuttle | 0 | September 12th 03 01:37 AM |