A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Astronomy and Astrophysics » Astronomy Misc
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Entire NASA Safety Panel Resigns!



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old September 24th 03, 02:21 AM
Rudolph_X
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Entire NASA Safety Panel Resigns!

All along, I suspected that they did a 'white-wash', 'cover-up job' when
they failed to mention the 'alien death ray' that struck the shuttle
before it went down. Also, the photos of the 'blue electircal bolt' seen
striking the shuttle just before it crashed, seem to have mysteriously
disapeared. No one ever mentioned the photos, and the photos were never
released for public viewing. What happened? A cover up?

Congress, also, is not satisfied with panel's conclusions either.
Something stinks in NASA!

http://edition.cnn.com/2003/TECH/spa....ap/index.html


  #2  
Old September 24th 03, 07:57 AM
N'vok
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Entire NASA Safety Panel Resigns!

Rudolph_X wrote in message ...
All along, I suspected that they did a 'white-wash', 'cover-up job' when
they failed to mention the 'alien death ray' that struck the shuttle
before it went down. Also, the photos of the 'blue electircal bolt' seen
striking the shuttle just before it crashed, seem to have mysteriously
disapeared. No one ever mentioned the photos, and the photos were never
released for public viewing. What happened? A cover up?

Congress, also, is not satisfied with panel's conclusions either.
Something stinks in NASA!

http://edition.cnn.com/2003/TECH/spa....ap/index.html


Weren't you going to go away and never return?
  #4  
Old September 24th 03, 06:35 PM
Carl R. Osterwald
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Entire NASA Safety Panel Resigns!

In article , Rudolph_X
wrote:

All along, I suspected that they did a 'white-wash', 'cover-up job' when
they failed to mention the 'alien death ray' that struck the shuttle
before it went down. Also, the photos of the 'blue electircal bolt' seen
striking the shuttle just before it crashed, seem to have mysteriously
disapeared. No one ever mentioned the photos, and the photos were never
released for public viewing. What happened? A cover up?


This one will require the Humvee-mounted woowoo gun.


-=-=-=-=-
  #5  
Old September 24th 03, 10:40 PM
Earl Colby Pottinger
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Entire NASA Safety Panel Resigns!

"Carl R. Osterwald" :

In article , Rudolph_X
wrote:

All along, I suspected that they did a 'white-wash', 'cover-up job' when
they failed to mention the 'alien death ray' that struck the shuttle
before it went down. Also, the photos of the 'blue electircal bolt' seen
striking the shuttle just before it crashed, seem to have mysteriously
disapeared. No one ever mentioned the photos, and the photos were never
released for public viewing. What happened? A cover up?


This one will require the Humvee-mounted woowoo gun.


Indeed, in the original report the claimed model of camera turns out to be
binoculars, pretty hard to take photos with

Later updates changed the model number to that of a digital camera. However
the news reports claims that he gave NASA his camera's film!

Later, still all his copies of the images were unavailable for downloading
for outsiders to inspect. I wonder why

Earl Colby Pottinger

--
I make public email sent to me! Hydrogen Peroxide Rockets, OpenBeos,
SerialTransfer 3.0, RAMDISK, BoatBuilding, DIY TabletPC. What happened to
the time? http://webhome.idirect.com/~earlcp
  #6  
Old September 25th 03, 04:36 AM
Rudolph_X
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Entire NASA Safety Panel Resigns!



Fred Garvin wrote:

On Tue, 23 Sep 2003 21:21:19 -0400, Rudolph_X wrote:



All along, I suspected that they did a 'white-wash', 'cover-up job' when
they failed to mention the 'alien death ray' that struck the shuttle
before it went down. Also, the photos of the 'blue electircal bolt' seen
striking the shuttle just before it crashed, seem to have mysteriously
disapeared. No one ever mentioned the photos, and the photos were never
released for public viewing. What happened? A cover up?

Congress, also, is not satisfied with panel's conclusions either.
Something stinks in NASA!




Douchebag says what?



Shortly after the shuttle crashed, the Science Editor at the San
Fransisco Chronicle ran a story that told of an amateur astromoner who
had photographed what appeared to be a strange craggy "blue electrical
bolt of energy" strinking the shuttle during its reentry into the
atmosphere, while it was still over California. NASA got a hold of the
digital camera and the memory chip that holds the digital photographs in
its memory, and that is the last we (the public) ever heard about it. No
mention was ever made of it during the investigation, and the photos
were never released for viewing by the public.

When I said, strange 'alien death ray', I didn't mean that some aliens
shot the shuttle down. What I meant is that the strange 'blue electrical
bolt' that was photographed striking the shuttle was 'alien' to our
understanding. As yet, no good explanation has been given as to what it
was, or why NASA is refusing to release the photos to the general public.



  #7  
Old September 25th 03, 06:12 AM
Rudolph_X
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Entire NASA Safety Panel Resigns!



Rudolph_X wrote:



Fred Garvin wrote:

On Tue, 23 Sep 2003 21:21:19 -0400, Rudolph_X wrote:



All along, I suspected that they did a 'white-wash', 'cover-up job' when
they failed to mention the 'alien death ray' that struck the shuttle
before it went down. Also, the photos of the 'blue electircal bolt' seen
striking the shuttle just before it crashed, seem to have mysteriously
disapeared. No one ever mentioned the photos, and the photos were never
released for public viewing. What happened? A cover up?

Congress, also, is not satisfied with panel's conclusions either.
Something stinks in NASA!




Douchebag says what?



Shortly after the shuttle crashed, the Science Editor at the San
Fransisco Chronicle ran a story that told of an amateur astromoner who
had photographed what appeared to be a strange craggy "blue electrical
bolt of energy" strinking the shuttle during its reentry into the
atmosphere, while it was still over California. NASA got a hold of
the digital camera and the memory chip that holds the digital
photographs in its memory, and that is the last we (the public) ever
heard about it. No mention was ever made of it during the
investigation, and the photos were never released for viewing by the
public.

When I said, strange 'alien death ray', I didn't mean that some aliens
shot the shuttle down. What I meant is that the strange 'blue
electrical bolt' that was photographed striking the shuttle was
'alien' to our understanding. As yet, no good explanation has been
given as to what it was, or why NASA is refusing to release the photos
to the general public.

Here are a few old links on the subject for those of you who may have
forgotten about it:

http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/articl...2/MN221641.DTL

http://www.rense.com/general34/wow.htm



  #8  
Old September 25th 03, 07:52 AM
Wally Anglesea™
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Entire NASA Safety Panel Resigns!

On Wed, 24 Sep 2003 01:21:19 GMT, Rudolph_X
wrote:

All along, I suspected that they did a 'white-wash', 'cover-up job' when
they failed to mention the 'alien death ray' that struck the shuttle
before it went down. Also, the photos of the 'blue electircal bolt' seen
striking the shuttle just before it crashed, seem to have mysteriously
disapeared. No one ever mentioned the photos, and the photos were never
released for public viewing. What happened? A cover up?

Congress, also, is not satisfied with panel's conclusions either.
Something stinks in NASA!

http://edition.cnn.com/2003/TECH/spa....ap/index.html



Hey Rudolph, Why can't anyone find this fictitious NSA in St
Petersburg?

OK, So far, I've been told that *THERE IS NO NSA IN ST PETERSBURG,
MUCH LESS A DEPT OF UFO RESEARCH, AND CERTAINLY NOT ONE THAT REPORTS
TO PUTIN

Looks like your sources were stoooooopppid again!!!

--
For the Truth about Planet X,
Phil Plait's excellent summary:
http://www.badastronomy.com/bad/misc/planetx/index.html
  #9  
Old September 25th 03, 08:56 AM
Rudolph_X
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Entire NASA Safety Panel Resigns!



Wally Anglesea^(TM) wrote:

On Wed, 24 Sep 2003 01:21:19 GMT, Rudolph_X
wrote:



All along, I suspected that they did a 'white-wash', 'cover-up job' when
they failed to mention the 'alien death ray' that struck the shuttle
before it went down. Also, the photos of the 'blue electircal bolt' seen
striking the shuttle just before it crashed, seem to have mysteriously
disapeared. No one ever mentioned the photos, and the photos were never
released for public viewing. What happened? A cover up?

Congress, also, is not satisfied with panel's conclusions either.
Something stinks in NASA!

http://edition.cnn.com/2003/TECH/spa....ap/index.html





Hey Rudolph, Why can't anyone find this fictitious NSA in St
Petersburg?

OK, So far, I've been told that *THERE IS NO NSA IN ST PETERSBURG,
MUCH LESS A DEPT OF UFO RESEARCH, AND CERTAINLY NOT ONE THAT REPORTS
TO PUTIN

Looks like your sources were stoooooopppid again!!!

--
For the Truth about Planet X,
Phil Plait's excellent summary:
http://www.badastronomy.com/bad/misc/planetx/index.html

Did you hear the one about the Chinese lumberjack's x-rated ET encounter?

Seems that Chinese also have a similar 'official' UFO governmental
agency. Read the artice from Time magazine.

http://www.time.com/time/asia/magazi...8900%2C00.html

Now try and tell us that the official UFO governmental agency in China
doesn't exist. No, you won't do that. (Just, watch folks, this is where
Wally turns into a heckler, avoids the issue and starts with his
personal attacks.)

If you can't debunk the Chinese official governmental UFO agency, why
should we believe that you can debunk the officical Russian UFO agency?
Indeed, many other countries throughout the world also have similar
official governmental agencies. However, the USA is still in the 'stone
ages' when it comes to these kinds of forward looking scientific
organizations. (Probably because its currently under the sway of the
religious right, huh?) Here in the USA even though a majority of the
population believes in UFOs, our government is still, apparently,
blatantly maintaining the cover-up.




  #10  
Old September 25th 03, 10:27 AM
Wally Anglesea™
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Entire NASA Safety Panel Resigns!

On Thu, 25 Sep 2003 07:56:23 GMT, Rudolph_X
wrote:



Wally Anglesea^(TM) wrote:

On Wed, 24 Sep 2003 01:21:19 GMT, Rudolph_X
wrote:



All along, I suspected that they did a 'white-wash', 'cover-up job' when
they failed to mention the 'alien death ray' that struck the shuttle
before it went down. Also, the photos of the 'blue electircal bolt' seen
striking the shuttle just before it crashed, seem to have mysteriously
disapeared. No one ever mentioned the photos, and the photos were never
released for public viewing. What happened? A cover up?

Congress, also, is not satisfied with panel's conclusions either.
Something stinks in NASA!

http://edition.cnn.com/2003/TECH/spa....ap/index.html





Hey Rudolph, Why can't anyone find this fictitious NSA in St
Petersburg?

OK, So far, I've been told that *THERE IS NO NSA IN ST PETERSBURG,
MUCH LESS A DEPT OF UFO RESEARCH, AND CERTAINLY NOT ONE THAT REPORTS
TO PUTIN

Looks like your sources were stoooooopppid again!!!

--
For the Truth about Planet X,
Phil Plait's excellent summary:
http://www.badastronomy.com/bad/misc/planetx/index.html

Did you hear the one about the Chinese lumberjack's x-rated ET encounter?


Yeah, and I'll pu it in the skeptical basket till it gets
investigated. Right now, I'm trying to verify your sources that
claimed some non-eixistent Russian claims something about a UFO.
Start making up your excuses now.


Seems that Chinese also have a similar 'official' UFO governmental
agency. Read the artice from Time magazine.

http://www.time.com/time/asia/magazi...8900%2C00.html

Now try and tell us that the official UFO governmental agency in China
doesn't exist. No, you won't do that. (Just, watch folks, this is where


NO, I'll get round to that one if I get the time. Right now, we are
discussing your Russian claims.



Wally turns into a heckler, avoids the issue and starts with his
personal attacks.)


Well, as far as you are concerned, it save a whole lot of time,
nitwit.



NO, I'm calling YOU, and your reliance on NEXUS. I'm not discussing
China, I want you explanation of using a non existent RUSSIAN
organisation to bolster you claims, nitwit.




If you can't debunk the Chinese official governmental UFO agency, why
should we believe that you can debunk the officical Russian UFO agency?


Are you *really* that stupid?


I guess you must be.




--
For the Truth about Planet X,
Phil Plait's excellent summary:
http://www.badastronomy.com/bad/misc/planetx/index.html
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Unofficial Space Shuttle Launch Guide Steven S. Pietrobon Space Shuttle 0 August 5th 04 01:36 AM
Unofficial Space Shuttle Launch Guide Steven S. Pietrobon Space Shuttle 0 April 2nd 04 12:01 AM
Unofficial Space Shuttle Launch Guide Steven S. Pietrobon Space Shuttle 0 February 2nd 04 03:33 AM
NASA Names New Safety Advisory Panel Ron Baalke Space Shuttle 0 November 18th 03 11:23 PM
Unofficial Space Shuttle Launch Guide Steven S. Pietrobon Space Shuttle 0 September 12th 03 01:37 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:28 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.