|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
References in celestial mechanics
I've found lots of books in the local library that explain how orbits of
planets work. However none I can find specifically explain how to calculate the positions of planets at specific times. Searching the web I've found Keplarian elements for the planets, and also references to Jean Meeus's Astronomical Elements. I've also found some negative reviews of that book. So what does everyone reckon the best references are in this field? There doesn't seem to be a huge amount on the web. So I'm assuming it will all be in hard to find books.... Thanks, David |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
References in celestial mechanics
Just in case I haven't made it clear, I'm talking about the level of
accuracy required for spacecraft trajectory design. Thanks, David |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
References in celestial mechanics
"David Findlay" wrote in message
. au... I've found lots of books in the local library that explain how orbits of planets work. However none I can find specifically explain how to calculate the positions of planets at specific times. Searching the web I've found Keplarian elements for the planets, and also references to Jean Meeus's Astronomical Elements. I've also found some negative reviews of that book. So what does everyone reckon the best references are in this field? There doesn't seem to be a huge amount on the web. So I'm assuming it will all be in hard to find books.... Thanks, Any time you're dealing with more than two large bodies in a gravitational system, except for contrived configurations, the method used is integration of the equations of motion. An "integrator" in this sense is a programmed numerical method that takes the equations of motion for a system along with a starting state (position and velocity of the component bodies) and evolves the state forward or backward in time. There are any number of integrators in use for different mechanical systems or systems of equations. For following planetary orbits and spacecraft, depending upon the accuracy required and the total time for the integration one can use simple "leapfrog" or Verlet algorithms, Runge-Kutta, or more sophisticated ones. For planet positions, NASA/JPL have already done the integrations for +/- many years from present. The positions have been reduced to multi-term series of sine and cosine terms, and a user only need download the data files and code up a program to read them and apply the algorithm. One integration that NASA/JPL did is called DE406. The results of the integration were reduced to a series form known as VSOP87 Theory by Bretagnon and Francou. VSOP87 is a very practical way to obtain accurate planet positions. The data files are freely available, along with sample programs to read and apply them. Jean Meeus, in his book Astronomical Algorithms, includes truncated data tables and the mathematics of the algorithm to be applied for each planet. A web search on VSOP87 Theory will turn up scads of related materials. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
References in celestial mechanics
On Sat, 27 Sep 2003 21:04:20 +1000, David Findlay
wrote: Just in case I haven't made it clear, I'm talking about the level of accuracy required for spacecraft trajectory design. Thanks, David Nowadays, spacecraft trjectories are planned on the basis of numerically integrated ephemerides. Depending on the accuracy required, special ephemerides may be prepared for specific missions. The method used is described in _The Explanatory Supplement to the Astronomical Almanac_, and Steve Moshier, who occasionally posts here, has put up some C code to perform the computations he http://www.moshier.net/ Look for de118i and examine the sources to see how you might want to modify them in terms of time intervals and such to get the accuracy you need. Al Moore |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
References in celestial mechanics
In article ,
David Findlay wrote: I've found lots of books in the local library that explain how orbits of planets work. However none I can find specifically explain how to calculate the positions of planets at specific times. Searching the web I've found Keplarian elements for the planets, and also references to Jean Meeus's Astronomical Elements. I've also found some negative reviews of that book. So what does everyone reckon the best references are in this field? There doesn't seem to be a huge amount on the web. So I'm assuming it will all be in hard to find books.... Thanks, On my web site (URL below) you'll find an explanation on how to compute the positions of the major planets with an accuracy of approximately one minute of arc. If you require more accuracy than that, I also give links to sites containing FORTRAN code for very high precision positions, using the VSOP87 end ELP2000 theories. -- ---------------------------------------------------------------- Paul Schlyter, Grev Turegatan 40, SE-114 38 Stockholm, SWEDEN e-mail: pausch at stockholm dot bostream dot se WWW: http://www.stjarnhimlen.se/ http://home.tiscali.se/pausch/ |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
References in celestial mechanics
In article ,
David Findlay wrote: Just in case I haven't made it clear, I'm talking about the level of accuracy required for spacecraft trajectory design. Thanks, The VSOP87 should provide enough accuracy. However, if you want to also compute the trajectory of the spacecraft itself, you must resort to numerical integration. If you do a web search for "de118i" you'll find free C code for hig-accuracy numerical integration of the major planets in the solar system. You can modify that code and add your own bodies, if you wish. -- ---------------------------------------------------------------- Paul Schlyter, Grev Turegatan 40, SE-114 38 Stockholm, SWEDEN e-mail: pausch at stockholm dot bostream dot se WWW: http://www.stjarnhimlen.se/ http://home.tiscali.se/pausch/ |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
References in celestial mechanics
In article ,
David Findlay wrote: Just in case I haven't made it clear, I'm talking about the level of accuracy required for spacecraft trajectory design. Thanks, The VSOP87 should provide enough accuracy. However, if you want to also compute the trajectory of the spacecraft itself, you must resort to numerical integration. If you do a web search for "de118i" you'll find free C code for hig-accuracy numerical integration of the major planets in the solar system. You can modify that code and add your own bodies, if you wish. Thanks for that information. David |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
References in celestial mechanics
Nowadays, spacecraft trjectories are planned on the basis of
numerically integrated ephemerides. Depending on the accuracy required, special ephemerides may be prepared for specific missions. The method used is described in _The Explanatory Supplement to the Astronomical Almanac_, and Steve Moshier, who occasionally posts here, has put up some C code to perform the computations he http://www.moshier.net/ Look for de118i and examine the sources to see how you might want to modify them in terms of time intervals and such to get the accuracy you need. Thanks for the information. David |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
References in celestial mechanics
A web search on VSOP87 Theory will turn up scads of
related materials. Thanks, David |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Spacecraft Doppler&Light Speed Extrapolation | ralph sansbury | Astronomy Misc | 91 | August 1st 13 01:32 PM |
Orbital Mechanics | JOE HECHT | Space Shuttle | 7 | July 21st 04 09:27 PM |
"Orbital Mechanics for Dummies" | JamesStep | Technology | 11 | November 11th 03 08:15 AM |
Chiral gravity of the Solar system | Aleksandr Timofeev | Astronomy Misc | 0 | August 13th 03 04:14 PM |
Intriguing Celestial Images Arrive From Galaxy Mission | Ron Baalke | Science | 0 | July 25th 03 11:15 PM |