The Greenpeace Report, Part II: NanoWars

For your information and/or entertainment,

The Greenpeace Report, Part II: NanoWars
http://nanobot.blogspot.com/2003_07_...15612210166946

Howard

Howard Lovy wrote:
For your information and/or entertainment,

The Greenpeace Report, Part II: NanoWars
http://nanobot.blogspot.com/2003_07_...15612210166946


And just what has it got to do with space?

Howard


--
Sander

+++ Out of cheese error +++

On 29 Jul 2003 07:21:53 -0700, (Gene
DiGennaro) wrote:

Nanotechnology along with MEMS will play a role in future space
exploration intitatives no doubt. In typical Luddite fashion, Redpeace
has decided that this is a bad technology and should be stopped now.
Unfortunately most folks don't see Greenpeace for what it is: an
Anti-Technology Communist organization. Now before you go off on a
flouridated water spiel consider this: At no time during the Cold War
did Greenpeace ever accuse Communist countries of environmental
disasters. Yet the Soviets were the folks who brought us Chernobyl and
countless other foul ups ( step in any time Jim O!). However, like
Amnesty International, Redpeace remained mute on the Soviets and
continued to hammer the United States for environmental policy. No
wonder the French tried to blow them up!

....You know, when all the Maxsons and the other troll trash who ruined
the original effort for an ssh get-together at KSC die horrible
deaths, and we finally have that convention, remind me to buy you a
drink for that one. Even if it does bring up the one really positive
military action the Frogs have engaged since WWII.


OM

--

"No ******* ever won a war by dying for | http://www.io.com/~o_m
his country. He won it by making the other | Sergeant-At-Arms
poor dumb ******* die for his country." | Human O-Ring Society

- General George S. Patton, Jr