A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Astronomy and Astrophysics » Astronomy Misc
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

The fallacy of instantaneous gravity



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old March 7th 19, 01:02 AM posted to sci.astro
[email protected]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3
Default The fallacy of instantaneous gravity

The fallacy of instantaneous gravity.

The .html version is more user friendly
http://members.optusnet.com.au/maxkeon/ofset.html

The image depicts two identical sun sized planets in circular
orbits around each other, separated by the orbit radius of
mercury around the sun. The red planet shown at (1) is the
apparent position of the relevant planet from the viewpoint of
its companion at position (2). The degree of offset is according
to the time distance between the orbiting planets times the true
orbital speed around the center of mass for the system (L/c*v')
: (5.8e10/3e8*23919 =193.3333 sec). The pointing direction of
the apparent tangent at location (2) would appear to drive the
planet outward. But that's not the case at all.

http://members.optusnet.com.au/maxkeon/ofset.jpg

The gforces drawing the planets toward each other are according
to GM/r'^2 = 3.95e-2 m/s^2 where r' is the orbit diameter. While
the centripetal acceleration is according to v'^2/r where r is
the orbit radius around the Barycenter and v' is orbital speed
relative to that radius (v'^2/r) = 1.976e-2, which is half that
required for a sustainable orbit. The orbit would quickly
collapse.

The apparent changing position of the companion planet is
proportional to the time length of the orbit diameter
(193.33333 sec). And the resultant tangent offset of 368.7 meters
resulting from the apparent planet shift of 4624366 meters gives
an outward acceleration rate of 2*l/t^2 : 2*368.7/193.333^2
= .01973 m/s^2. The inward collapse is counteracted.

The reasoning will be logically adaptable to every scenario.

-----

Max Keon

  #2  
Old March 20th 19, 12:39 AM posted to sci.astro
[email protected]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3
Default The fallacy of instantaneous gravity

On Thursday, 7 March 2019 11:02:04 UTC+11, wrote:
The fallacy of instantaneous gravity.

The .html version is more user friendly
http://members.optusnet.com.au/maxkeon/ofset.html

The image depicts two identical sun sized planets in circular
orbits around each other, separated by the orbit radius of
mercury around the sun. The red planet shown at (1) is the
apparent position of the relevant planet from the viewpoint of
its companion at position (2). The degree of offset is according
to the time distance between the orbiting planets times the true
orbital speed around the center of mass for the system (L/c*v')
: (5.8e10/3e8*23919 =193.3333 sec). The pointing direction of
the apparent tangent at location (2) would appear to drive the
planet outward. But that's not the case at all.

http://members.optusnet.com.au/maxkeon/ofset.jpg

The gforces drawing the planets toward each other are according
to GM/r'^2 = 3.95e-2 m/s^2 where r' is the orbit diameter. While
the centripetal acceleration is according to v'^2/r where r is
the orbit radius around the Barycenter and v' is orbital speed
relative to that radius (v'^2/r) = 1.976e-2, which is half that
required for a sustainable orbit. The orbit would quickly
collapse.

The apparent changing position of the companion planet is
proportional to the time length of the orbit diameter
(193.33333 sec). And the resultant tangent offset of 368.7 meters
resulting from the apparent planet shift of 4624366 meters gives
an outward acceleration rate of 2*l/t^2 : 2*368.7/193.333^2
= .01973 m/s^2. The inward collapse is counteracted.

The reasoning will be logically adaptable to every scenario.

---

Perhaps I haven't made myself very clear.

In Newtonian gravity there was never an instantaneous link between
gravitating masses, so the significance of GR's curved spacetime
is diminished considerably. GR adds new dimension to something
that was already geometrically correct.

This three frame animation is the proof.
http://members.optusnet.com.au/maxkeon/ofset2.gif
(ESC halts the animation at any chosen frame (maybe))

-----

Max Keon

(to be continued)

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Instantaneous Speed Of Gravity And Reactionless Drive Invention AbhiJeet Patil Astronomy Misc 1 January 10th 18 03:01 AM
Is EMP a Lib fallacy? Solar 4 July 6th 06 12:30 AM
Is EMP a Lib fallacy? UK Astronomy 4 July 6th 06 12:30 AM
Electric Gravity&Instantaneous Light ralph sansbury Astronomy Misc 8 August 31st 03 02:53 AM
Electric Gravity&Instantaneous Light ralph sansbury Astronomy Misc 2 July 8th 03 03:01 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:00 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.