|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
EINSTEIN'S FUNDAMENTAL LIE
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OKKbkS_LOu4
2:27 : "Einstein showed that the faster one travels, the slower time goes for the traveler." This does not follow from Einstein's 1905 postulates. The valid conclusion from the postulates is: The faster one travels, the FASTER time goes for the traveler (he sees his clock running faster than stationary clocks): http://www.people.fas.harvard.edu/~djmorin/chap11.pdf Introduction to Classical Mechanics With Problems and Solutions, David Morin, Cambridge University Press, Chapter 11, p. 14: "Twin A stays on the earth, while twin B flies quickly to a distant star and back. (...) For the entire outward and return parts of the trip, B does observe A's clock running slow..." Pentcho Valev |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
EINSTEIN'S FUNDAMENTAL LIE
The original version of Einstein's fundamental lie:
http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einstein/specrel/www/ ON THE ELECTRODYNAMICS OF MOVING BODIES, A. Einstein, 1905: "From this there ensues the following peculiar consequence. If at the points A and B of K there are stationary clocks which, viewed in the stationary system, are synchronous; and if the clock at A is moved with the velocity v along the line AB to B, then on its arrival at B the two clocks no longer synchronize, but the clock moved from A to B lags behind the other which has remained at B by tv^2/2c^2 (up to magnitudes of fourth and higher order), t being the time occupied in the journey from A to B." http://blog.hasslberger.com/Dingle_S...Crossroads.pdf SCIENCE AT THE CROSSROADS, Herbert Dingle, p.27: "According to the special relativity theory, as expounded by Einstein in his original paper, two similar, regularly-running clocks, A and B, in uniform relative motion, must work at different rates. (...) How is the slower-working clock distinguished?" Dingle's question is rhetorical - the slower-working clock cannot be distinguished on the basis of Einstein's 1905 postulates alone. The postulates entail that: (A) for an observer in the moving clock's system, the stationary clock at B lags behind the moving clock; (B) for a stationary observer, the moving clock lags behind the stationary clock at B. Clearly there is a contradiction which means that an underlying premise, Einstein's 1905 constant-speed-of-light postulate, is false. Pentcho Valev |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
THE FUNDAMENTAL DILEMMA IN EINSTEIN'S RELATIVITY | Pentcho Valev | Astronomy Misc | 1 | June 4th 14 08:46 PM |
Fundamental Questions | Elassoto | Research | 0 | August 27th 13 01:36 PM |
FUNDAMENTAL LAW OF COSMOLOGY | Pentcho Valev | Astronomy Misc | 10 | September 17th 08 06:10 PM |
CLAUSIUS ZOMBIE WORLD IS MORE FUNDAMENTAL THAN EINSTEIN ZOMBIE WORLD | Pentcho Valev | Astronomy Misc | 4 | September 12th 08 02:51 PM |
A fundamental Question | Researcher | Astronomy Misc | 17 | October 17th 06 04:53 AM |