#1
|
|||
|
|||
Aether has mass
On Thu, 8 Nov 2012 09:25:20 -0800 (PST), Brad Guth
wrote: On Nov 8, 8:31*am, Painius wrote: On Thu, 8 Nov 2012 05:40:01 -0800 (PST), Brad Guth wrote: On Nov 6, 1:55 pm, mpc755 wrote: On Nov 6, 4:47 pm, Painius wrote: On Tue, 6 Nov 2012 12:31:16 -0800 (PST), mpc755 wrote: On Nov 6, 2:50 pm, HVAC wrote: On 11/6/2012 1:41 PM, mpc755 wrote: On Nov 6, 1:17 pm, wrote: On 11/6/2012 12:55 PM, Mike Cavedon wrote: Dark Matter Core Defies Explanation in NASA Hubble Image http://www.nasa.gov/home/hqnews/2012...Dark_Core.html Ether exists exactly as much as ghosts exist. When performing ANY calculations, ether, god and ghosts can be treated exactly in the same manner...As if they do not exist at all. "space without ether is unthinkable" - Albert Einstein Times change. And mainstream physics is so screwed up it can't understand displaced aether pushing back and exerting inward pressure toward matter is gravity and in a double slit experiment the particle travels through a single slit and the associated wave in the aether through both. "It is ironic that Einstein's most creative work, the general theory of relativity, should boil down to conceptualizing space as a medium when his original premise [in special relativity] was that no such medium existed [..] The word 'ether' has extremely negative connotations in theoretical physics because of its past association with opposition to relativity. This is unfortunate because, stripped of these connotations, it rather nicely captures the way most physicists actually think about the vacuum. . . . Relativity actually says nothing about the existence or nonexistence of matter pervading the universe, only that any such matter must have relativistic symmetry. [..] It turns out that such matter exists. About the time relativity was becoming accepted, studies of radioactivity began showing that the empty vacuum of space had spectroscopic structure similar to that of ordinary quantum solids and fluids. Subsequent studies with large particle accelerators have now led us to understand that space is more like a piece of window glass than ideal Newtonian emptiness. It is filled with 'stuff' that is normally transparent but can be made visible by hitting it sufficiently hard to knock out a part. The modern concept of the vacuum of space, confirmed every day by experiment, is a relativistic ether. But we do not call it this because it is taboo." - Robert B. Laughlin, Nobel Laureate in Physics, endowed chair in physics, Stanford University For some odd reason, they threw the baby out with the bathwater. And then they deny that's what happened. Einstein said, "According to the general theory of relativity space without ether is unthinkable". Interpret that as you may. It certainly is NOT Einstein doing away with the ether. There is physical evidence 'non-baryonic dark matter' is not anchored to matter. This means matter moves through 'non-baryonic dark matter'. If matter moves through 'non-baryonic dark matter' then that means aether has mass. It is so simple it is ridiculous. Once you understand aether has mass you understand displaced aether pushing back toward matter is gravity. Once you understand aether has mass you understand the wave of wave- particle duality is a wave in the aether. Once you understand aether has mass you understand Einstein's gravitational wave is de Broglie's pilot-wave. They are both waves in the aether. Perhaps you'll need to make aether much more complex, rather than "so simple it is ridiculous". For myself, it's that aether push of representing gravity that doesn't fly, because that makes molecular stuff as representing antigravity. There's another reason... It has to be explained how and why that "aether mass" does not generate heat through the atmosphere as it "drops" toward the ground to result in gravitation. No doubt mpc755 will eventually explain that in detail, though as of yet I'm not convinced aether represents gravity, at least not directly. The idea that the spatial medium is drawn toward matter, drawn into matter to replenish each and every atom on a constant basis is the main idea, the main interaction between space and matter from our viewpoint. The reality, as Einstein put it, is that space and mass are "extensions" of each other. They are one and the same thing. They appear to us as two very different things, however they are actually two renditions, two "states" if you will, of one energy. Gravitation is merely a byproduct (lucky for us) of the above. As space flows into, for example, the human body, some of it goes into each and every atom of the body to constantly replenish the forces of those atoms. The part of space that flows on through the body, that does not enter the body's atoms, produces the pressure that keeps the body's feet on the ground. That action is similar to the wind through the sails of a windmill. -- Indelibly yours, Paine @ http://astronomy.painellsworth.net/ "To live a creative life, you must lose your fear of being wrong." |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Aether has mass
On 11/9/2012 11:20 AM, Painius wrote:
The idea that the spatial medium is drawn toward matter, drawn into matter to replenish each and every atom on a constant basis is the main idea, the main interaction between space and matter from our viewpoint. The reality, as Einstein put it, is that space and mass are "extensions" of each other. They are one and the same thing. They appear to us as two very different things, however they are actually two renditions, two "states" if you will, of one energy. Gravitation is merely a byproduct (lucky for us) of the above. As space flows into, for example, the human body, some of it goes into each and every atom of the body to constantly replenish the forces of those atoms. The part of space that flows on through the body, that does not enter the body's atoms, produces the pressure that keeps the body's feet on the ground. That action is similar to the wind through the sails of a windmill. Foolish idea with absolutely ZERO evidence to support it. -- "OK you ****s, let's see what you can do now" -Hit Girl http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CjO7kBqTFqo .. 变亮 http://www.richardgingras.com/tia/im...logo_large.jpg |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Aether has mass | Painius[_1_] | Astronomy Misc | 1161 | March 11th 13 07:37 PM |
Experimental evidence aether has mass | mpc755 | Astronomy Misc | 4 | November 27th 10 01:50 PM |
Yes, REAL suspected Black Holes can RiP you APART.!! But NOT in GR gtr Tivity.!! Because in GR Tivity you would be a POiNT ..and if you COULD have a mass, in GR, you would be a POiNT-mass. POiNT-mass CANNOT *STRETCH* with TOP & BOTTOM ROCKETs attache | brian a m stuckless | Astronomy Misc | 0 | October 15th 05 12:22 PM |
Causation - A problem with negative mass. Negastive mass implies imaginary mass | brian a m stuckless | Astronomy Misc | 0 | October 1st 05 08:36 PM |