|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#511
|
|||
|
|||
Science out the window when it comes to political issues like "gun control" and Global Warming!
They do not proof causation, however strong correlations tend to indicate causation to be likelly. "Rand Simberg" wrote No, they don't, and even if they did, they provide no information as to which is cause, and which is effect, or whether both are effects of some other, unknown cause. Excellent, then you hold that repeating an experiment and getting the same results doesn't verify the results of the experiment. It could just be a coincidence. Apparently Simberg is too stupid to understand that if the probability of any single correlation is x 1 then the probabiility of n events being repeated and showing the same correlation is x**n. Meaning that the likelyhood of error becomes exponentially small with the number of correlations. Stupid.. Stupid Simberg. |
#512
|
|||
|
|||
Science out the window when it comes to political issues like "gun control" and Global Warming!
"Fred J. McCall" wrote Well, one more short lesson. Remember, correlation does NOT imply causation. Correlation implies common causation. |
#513
|
|||
|
|||
Science out the window when it comes to political issues like "gun control" and Global Warming!
"Rand Simberg" wrote But there could also be (at least in theory) some mechanism by which higher temperatures generate additional CO2. Let's hope not, though, since that would be a very nasty positive feedback. You mean like warmer oceans outgassing CO2 - as is anticipated? You mean like warmer weather promoting more air conditioning, which means more carbon consumption and more CO2 - as is anticipated? You mean like warmer arctic temps causing the permafrost to melt, rot, and release CO2? - as is occurring. |
#514
|
|||
|
|||
Science out the window when it comes to political issues like "gun control" and Global Warming!
"Whata Fool" wrote Now you are really getting stupid, how do you suppose that the atmospheric concentration of CO2 could get to 5 times current? Through the continued consumption of carbon based fuels at rates that are twice the rate of sequestration, and through the positive feedback of ocean CO2 outgassing as the deep oceans warm. "Whata Fool" wrote The oil will run out almost totally as a fuel within a hundred years, and making plastics is different than burning oil. There will be plenty of coal left for another thousand years of CO2 production. "Whata Fool" wrote There are only about 3 possible technologies that can prevent large scale freezing, inertial containment fusion, solar energy, and geothermal. And fission, magnetic confignment fusion, and of course adding additional insulating gasses like methane to the atmosphere. "Whata Fool" wrote The time wasted on magnetic confinement fusion was the result of a poor assumption about fusion "releasing" energy, in stars it is gravity that "squeezes" the energy out. Ah the wording of a child. Inertial confignment fusion is dead in the water- and now exists mostly as a means of nuclear weapons validation and research. "Whata Fool" wrote The time and money being wasted on the global warming nonsense is disgraceful, it seems that telling a big lie causes half the people to believe it, but telling a bigger lie causes almost everybody to believe it, for a little while. Yawn. We heard the same tripe coming from know nothing denialists who were whining about the Montreal Protocol for the reduction of CFC's.. **** off and Die. Ignorant Fool. "Whata Fool" wrote Possibly the only thing that can stop the nonsense is what temperature data does over the next 10 years or so. It's guaranteed to do so. "Whata Fool" wrote Pray to your God that it doesn't go up. It will, and you will look even more the fool than you do today. |
#515
|
|||
|
|||
Science out the window when it comes to political issues like "gun control" and Global Warming!
"Whata Fool" wrote Hopefully the ocean is self cooling. Ya, lets hope it has invested in a central air conditioning system on the moon. Stupid. KKKonservative Foool. |
#516
|
|||
|
|||
Science out the window when it comes to political issues like "gun control" and Global Warming!
"Whata Fool" wrote I definitely am not a socialist. Whata Fool. "Whata Fool" wrote The good thing about free enterprise is that the inefficient businesses fail, and new ones take their place. The bad thing about free enterprise is that it is 80 to 95% inefficient. |
#517
|
|||
|
|||
Science out the window when it comes to political issues like "gun control" and Global Warming!
"Bill Ward" wrote That's assuming CO2 has a significant heating effect. Negative feedback from the water cycle may swamp it out. Hasen't happened so far. Why would anyone risk the future on the fantasy that future warming might be limited by such a fortunate turn of events? Maybe shooting yourself in the head will make you smarter. Be my guest. |
#518
|
|||
|
|||
Science out the window when it comes to political issues like "gun control" and Global Warming!
"Bill Ward" wrote An effect cannot occur before its cause. For ice cores, CO2 causing temperature to change is ruled out by CO2 lagging after temperature. temperature.. Wrong. While cause and effect have a set order (outside of the microscopic quantum world), CO2 effects can still be delayed and still alter current temperatures. Rising CO2 isn't a light switch, a big truck you can dump something on, or a series of tubes. Higher ocean temperatures today mean more CO2 outgassing today and higher temperatures tomorrow. Now the rates of change may be different between the rate of heating and the rate of CO2 production, and that is what produces the delay. But the CO2 that is currently outgassing will immediately change the temperature. The delay tells you that the CO2 wasn't in the drivers seat at that time - it was acting as an amplifier with a phase delay due to ocean heating. Now if this was a periodic oscillation the CO2 could be in the drivers seat and still be delayed - just look how damped driven harmonic oscillators work. In such systems you can even have the driver pushing the system in one direction and the system seeming to respond in the opposite direction - due to the cumulative stresses induced on the system earlier. Now go read a book.... |
#519
|
|||
|
|||
Science out the window when it comes to political issues like "gun control" and Global Warming!
"columbiaaccidentinvestigation" wrote I believe people have a little more to vote for than adhering to a party block vote, such as regional or local issues that cross party lines, but if one has 70% of the national electorate that is willing to listen to new ideas, and then I think there is a pretty good chance of changes being made. Once 30% of the body is cancerous, the patient dies. So it is with AmeriKKKa. "columbiaaccidentinvestigation" wrote And like I said before nobody said we don't have a lot of work to do, financial, social, etc. but times are relative, and this nation will survive these turbulent times just as it has in the past. No oil + No Money + No International Support + No Time + No Brains + 30% tissue Necrosis = No Future. Do you hear the dirt hitting the roof of AmeriKKKa's coffin? Everyone else in the world does. "columbiaaccidentinvestigation" wrote The guidelines set from the founding fathers in the U.S. constitution gives our nation a great advantage when dealing with turbulent times, so I do have confidence that America will continue to be strong, Largest debtor nation on earth, imports more food than exports, no manufacturing sector, even Microsoft can't find adequate workers in the intellectual sector so Microsoft is moving to the Socialist nations. Same with IBM, and virtually every other high tech company. Can't even tame a stone age culture in Afghanistan or Iraq. Other than the powerful stench of rot coming from the AmeriKKKan state, how is AmeriKKKa powerful? Remind us again? Now no with respect to pursuing al queda there is no sympathy needed, just a motivation to pursue a common enemy. Al Queda isn't my enemy. AmeriKKKa is the enemy of all good people. As to Al Queda, it is an organization manufactured by AmeriKKKan war Propaganda. To the extent that the organization now exists. I wish it well in killing as many AmeriKKKans as it sees fit. And yes I care, I care about the dead or injured civilians who were caught in the cross fire, and I care about the 18 year kid who I have never seen, from some part of this country I never been to, but that same kid joined the U.S. military for whatever reason I don't know, but he is dead now, never to live the years I have, and that just sucks... Oh well, the AmeriKKKan ****er chose to murder and die on a whim. It's excellent that murderous criminals like him be executed ASAP, and the more the better. So go on, rant you petty little down with America crap, as it is a lot easier to sit there complain and antagonize others, rather than look for positive solutions, build a consensus based on compromise, and make positive changes happen for our nation. AmeriKKKa is a disease that is being exterminated. And the sooner the better for everyone. Including AmeriKKKans |
#520
|
|||
|
|||
Science out the window when it comes to political issues like "gun control" and Global Warming!
"Whata Fool" wrote Yes, and that one to the left is moving further left. :-) Excellent, it has only a few thousand miles to go before it becomes as enlightened as the rest of the world. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
...According to Nasa.."Consensus is Global Warming is Real" and "Detrimental" | Jonathan | Policy | 9 | December 22nd 06 07:19 AM |
...According to Nasa.."Consensus is Global Warming is Real" and "Detrimental" | Jonathan | History | 9 | December 22nd 06 07:19 AM |
"Science" Lightweight Addresses "Global Warming" (and Chinese Food) | Planetoid2001 | Amateur Astronomy | 0 | June 21st 06 10:33 PM |
"Science" Lightweight Addresses "Global Warming" (and Chinese Food) | Astronomie | Amateur Astronomy | 0 | June 21st 06 04:01 PM |
"Science" Lightweight Addresses "Global Warming" (and Chinese Food) | Phineas T Puddleduck | Amateur Astronomy | 0 | June 21st 06 03:23 PM |