|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
What is the visual difference between a stone and a satellite?
I have the impression there is
NO REAL DIIFERENCE... So it is NO REAL PROOF of the reality of the space-travel-thing... You need a velocity of 28.000km/hr for space-travel around the earth That velocity is NOT YET demonstrated for an earthly object of one kilogram... So the whole space-travel-thing is fake... and you can easily see this at any launch of a Space Shuttle... (that is the real reason why you can not see it anymore... and certainly not after 2010, as president Bush said.) www.geocities.com/markpeeters96/a.html |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
What is the visual difference between a stone and a satellite?
Evidently, this guy have never seen the ISS... :-)))
bart janssens wrote: I have the impression there is NO REAL DIIFERENCE... So it is NO REAL PROOF of the reality of the space-travel-thing... You need a velocity of 28.000km/hr for space-travel around the earth That velocity is NOT YET demonstrated for an earthly object of one kilogram... So the whole space-travel-thing is fake... and you can easily see this at any launch of a Space Shuttle... (that is the real reason why you can not see it anymore... and certainly not after 2010, as president Bush said.) www.geocities.com/markpeeters96/a.html |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
What is the visual difference between a stone and a satellite?
Evidently, this guy have never seen the ISS... :-)))
bart janssens wrote: I have the impression there is NO REAL DIIFERENCE... So it is NO REAL PROOF of the reality of the space-travel-thing... You need a velocity of 28.000km/hr for space-travel around the earth That velocity is NOT YET demonstrated for an earthly object of one kilogram... So the whole space-travel-thing is fake... and you can easily see this at any launch of a Space Shuttle... (that is the real reason why you can not see it anymore... and certainly not after 2010, as president Bush said.) www.geocities.com/markpeeters96/a.html |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
What is the visual difference between a stone and a satellite?
(bart janssens) wrote in
m: I have the impression there is NO REAL DIIFERENCE... So it is NO REAL PROOF of the reality of the space-travel-thing... You need a velocity of 28.000km/hr for space-travel around the earth That velocity is NOT YET demonstrated for an earthly object of one kilogram... So the whole space-travel-thing is fake... and you can easily see this at any launch of a Space Shuttle... (that is the real reason why you can not see it anymore... and certainly not after 2010, as president Bush said.) www.geocities.com/markpeeters96/a.html Can you tell me what you're smoking? I'd like to avoid it. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
What is the visual difference between a stone and a satellite?
"Skywise" wrote in message . 125.201... (bart janssens) wrote in m: I have the impression there is NO REAL DIIFERENCE... So it is NO REAL PROOF of the reality of the space-travel-thing... You need a velocity of 28.000km/hr for space-travel around the earth That velocity is NOT YET demonstrated for an earthly object of one kilogram... So the whole space-travel-thing is fake... and you can easily see this at any launch of a Space Shuttle... (that is the real reason why you can not see it anymore... and certainly not after 2010, as president Bush said.) www.geocities.com/markpeeters96/a.html Can you tell me what you're smoking? I'd like to avoid it. Please don't feed the trolls. This guy is a certified net loon and will tend to pester beyond simple annoyance. -- Stephen Home Page: stephmon.com Satellite Hunting: sathunt.com |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
What is the visual difference between a stone and a satellite?
"Skywise" wrote in message . 125.201... (bart janssens) wrote in m: I have the impression there is NO REAL DIIFERENCE... So it is NO REAL PROOF of the reality of the space-travel-thing... You need a velocity of 28.000km/hr for space-travel around the earth That velocity is NOT YET demonstrated for an earthly object of one kilogram... So the whole space-travel-thing is fake... and you can easily see this at any launch of a Space Shuttle... (that is the real reason why you can not see it anymore... and certainly not after 2010, as president Bush said.) www.geocities.com/markpeeters96/a.html Can you tell me what you're smoking? I'd like to avoid it. Please don't feed the trolls. This guy is a certified net loon and will tend to pester beyond simple annoyance. -- Stephen Home Page: stephmon.com Satellite Hunting: sathunt.com |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
What is the visual difference between a stone and a satellite?
Alexander Avtanski wrote in message ...
Evidently, this guy have never seen the ISS... :-))) What did you see? A stone, which could be a natural satellite? Or was it a articifial satellite? Or do you admit there is NO visual difference??? www.geocities.com/markpeeters96/a.html bart janssens wrote: I have the impression there is NO REAL DIIFERENCE... So it is NO REAL PROOF of the reality of the space-travel-thing... You need a velocity of 28.000km/hr for space-travel around the earth That velocity is NOT YET demonstrated for an earthly object of one kilogram... So the whole space-travel-thing is fake... and you can easily see this at any launch of a Space Shuttle... (that is the real reason why you can not see it anymore... and certainly not after 2010, as president Bush said.) www.geocities.com/markpeeters96/a.html |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
What is the visual difference between a stone and a satellite?
Alexander Avtanski wrote in message ...
Evidently, this guy have never seen the ISS... :-))) What did you see? A stone, which could be a natural satellite? Or was it a articifial satellite? Or do you admit there is NO visual difference??? www.geocities.com/markpeeters96/a.html bart janssens wrote: I have the impression there is NO REAL DIIFERENCE... So it is NO REAL PROOF of the reality of the space-travel-thing... You need a velocity of 28.000km/hr for space-travel around the earth That velocity is NOT YET demonstrated for an earthly object of one kilogram... So the whole space-travel-thing is fake... and you can easily see this at any launch of a Space Shuttle... (that is the real reason why you can not see it anymore... and certainly not after 2010, as president Bush said.) www.geocities.com/markpeeters96/a.html |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
What is the visual difference between a stone and a satellite?
"bart janssens" wrote in message om... Alexander Avtanski wrote in message ... Evidently, this guy have never seen the ISS... :-))) What did you see? Depending on the telescope and tracking, anyone with the knowhow can see something like this... http://www.astronomy.com/Content/Dyn...0/845hvkyl.asp A stone, which could be a natural satellite? Most definitely not. Or was it a articifial satellite? Absolutely. Or do you admit there is NO visual difference??? There is a vast visual difference, namely structure, predictable position, etc.. Now, go hawk your flawed theories to a group who doesn't prove you wrong every clear night. -- Stephen Home Page: stephmon.com Satellite Hunting: sathunt.com |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Mars Rover Inspects Stone Ejected From Crater | Ron | Astronomy Misc | 0 | May 17th 04 10:58 PM |