kill all the stupid people

On Thu, 25 Oct 2007 21:20:31 +0000, BradGuth wrote:

"kill all the stupid people" will be mostly accomplished by way of
simply rounding up and exterminating all of the usenet anti-think-tank
naysayers that are mostly MI5/DHS/NSA/CIA spooks and moles as acting
MIB or official infowar rusemasters (aka Zion Yids).

You are obviously in the placebo/control group.

(BTW: I'm watching you)

--
I told you this was going to happen.

Rhiannon wrote:

"Rowland McDonnell" wrote:
Rhiannon wrote:

[swnip]

I used to know a man who was a retired MI5 agent and if you actually
believe
what you said above about your own government, you're very naive.

There have been many incidents in the past which look very much like
what I've described. But I don't say my government is behind it; then
again, the spooks don't always do what the government wants (c.f. spying
on the Wilson government for fear of - well, treachery, really). Nor do
I believe anything at all. There is puzzling data that needs
explaining. If you think the sort of thing that I've described doesn't
go on, you're blind to the world around you.

Quite the opposite. NO government is to be trusted, including mine own
(Canada), but while you're hurling stones at the CIA in the US of A, it
might serve you to keep in mind that your own clandestine government
sanctioned murders are cold, calculating, and kill with impunity, including
British citizens.

My government doesn't have any clandestine killers. You've been reading
too many spy thrillers. The only killers they've got are the ones out
in the open - the Metropolitan Police for innocent Brazilian
electricians, and more serious people when you actually want someone
dangerous dealt with... This isn't France or Israel, you know; and
James Bond isn't real.

I'm not at all convinced that the spooks don't do the odd bit of murder
occasionally - but not under government direction. And they certainly
wouldn't publicise the matter if they, like the CIA, did things like
slaughter unidentified people in a car from the air on suspicion of them
`being terrorists' - but the CIA's done that, and boasted about it!

Quite outrageous, but there you go. Our lot are bright enough to try to
make any killing look like a natural death or suicide at worst - well, I
hope they do. I'd be very unhappy at them if they weren't careful like
that - one does at least hope for *competent* spooks, you know?

Whether a goverment is more or less open about what they
do does not change the fact that they're all the same.

Riiight... So the Mugabe government is in all respects effectively
identical to the government of the Swiss canton of Schwyz? And in their
turn, they're just like William Gladstone's final turn at PM? All of
whom work exactly the same way as the governments of Louis XIV of
France, William the ******* of Normandy (1066 and all that), and those
that ran the Weimar Republic?

I'll give you a few hints: Mugabe is an oppressive dictator who's got no
idea how to run a country anywhere but into the ground. Switzerland is
the only democratic nation on the planet and the Swiss run things very
well. And Gladstone was a fruitcake but did his duty as he saw fit...

And never mind the rest... No, all governments are different -
admittedly, they all have things in common, but not a lot.

Don't make the
mistake of thinking you country has some sort of elevated status that makes
you better than any other. That first step right before the proud fall is a
big one.

[snip]

But Britain /is/ superior. You seem to forget that this nation has been
around a long time. We've had our falls - many of them - after the
pride and now we're back up again - again.

Rowland.

--
Remove the animal for email address:
Sorry - the spam got to me
http://www.mag-uk.org http://www.bmf.co.uk
UK biker? Join MAG and the BMF and stop the Eurocrats banning biking

"Rowland McDonnell" wrote in
message
...
Rhiannon wrote:

"Rowland McDonnell" wrote:
Rhiannon wrote:

[swnip]

I used to know a man who was a retired MI5 agent and if you
actually
believe
what you said above about your own government, you're very naive.

There have been many incidents in the past which look very much
like
what I've described. But I don't say my government is behind it;
then
again, the spooks don't always do what the government wants (c.f.
spying
on the Wilson government for fear of - well, treachery, really).
Nor do
I believe anything at all. There is puzzling data that needs
explaining. If you think the sort of thing that I've described
doesn't
go on, you're blind to the world around you.

Quite the opposite. NO government is to be trusted, including mine
own
(Canada), but while you're hurling stones at the CIA in the US of A,
it
might serve you to keep in mind that your own clandestine government
sanctioned murders are cold, calculating, and kill with impunity,
including
British citizens.

My government doesn't have any clandestine killers. You've been
reading
too many spy thrillers. The only killers they've got are the ones out
in the open - the Metropolitan Police for innocent Brazilian
electricians, and more serious people when you actually want someone
dangerous dealt with... This isn't France or Israel, you know; and
James Bond isn't real.

I'm not at all convinced that the spooks don't do the odd bit of
murder
occasionally - but not under government direction. And they certainly
wouldn't publicise the matter if they, like the CIA, did things like
slaughter unidentified people in a car from the air on suspicion of
them
`being terrorists' - but the CIA's done that, and boasted about it!

Quite outrageous, but there you go. Our lot are bright enough to try
to
make any killing look like a natural death or suicide at worst - well,
I
hope they do. I'd be very unhappy at them if they weren't careful
like
that - one does at least hope for *competent* spooks, you know?

Whether a goverment is more or less open about what they
do does not change the fact that they're all the same.

Riiight... So the Mugabe government is in all respects effectively
identical to the government of the Swiss canton of Schwyz? And in
their
turn, they're just like William Gladstone's final turn at PM? All of
whom work exactly the same way as the governments of Louis XIV of
France, William the ******* of Normandy (1066 and all that), and those
that ran the Weimar Republic?

I'll give you a few hints: Mugabe is an oppressive dictator who's got
no
idea how to run a country anywhere but into the ground. Switzerland
is
the only democratic nation on the planet and the Swiss run things very
well. And Gladstone was a fruitcake but did his duty as he saw fit...

And never mind the rest... No, all governments are different -
admittedly, they all have things in common, but not a lot.

Don't make the
mistake of thinking you country has some sort of elevated status
that makes
you better than any other. That first step right before the proud
fall is a
big one.

[snip]

But Britain /is/ superior. You seem to forget that this nation has
been
around a long time. We've had our falls - many of them - after the
pride and now we're back up again - again.

Rowland.

--
Remove the animal for email address:
Sorry - the spam got to me
http://www.mag-uk.org http://www.bmf.co.uk
UK biker? Join MAG and the BMF and stop the Eurocrats banning biking



sure you are that's why your subways get blowed up ,
and rabid foxes control the streets , Canada is The King ,
GO MAPLE LEAFS

Lachlan wrote:

"Rowland McDonnell" wrote:
Lachlan wrote:

[snip]

Remove the word "stupid" and I'll sign up ;o)

Even if you're first against the wall?

[snip stuff that Lachlan's broken newsreader left behind]

I'd need to be last to make sure it all gets done,

Funnily enough, that's what everyone who's in favour of the scheme says.

but I'd take a bullet for
mother nature, no bother.

I don't believe you - prove it. ;-)

Rowland.

--
Remove the animal for email address:
Sorry - the spam got to me
http://www.mag-uk.org http://www.bmf.co.uk
UK biker? Join MAG and the BMF and stop the Eurocrats banning biking

"Rowland McDonnell" wrote in
message
...
Lachlan wrote:

"Rowland McDonnell" wrote:
Lachlan wrote:

[snip]

Remove the word "stupid" and I'll sign up ;o)

Even if you're first against the wall?

[snip stuff that Lachlan's broken newsreader left behind]

I'd need to be last to make sure it all gets done,

Funnily enough, that's what everyone who's in favour of the scheme
says.

but I'd take a bullet for
mother nature, no bother.

I don't believe you - prove it. ;-)

Rowland.

--
Remove the animal for email address:
Sorry - the spam got to me
http://www.mag-uk.org http://www.bmf.co.uk
UK biker? Join MAG and the BMF and stop the Eurocrats banning biking


i'll prove it right after you prove it untrue ,
and if you don't , you're a liar and if you do you're an idiot ,
ok , its your turn now

On 26 Oct, 01:47, "%" wrote:
"Rowland McDonnell" wrote in
...



Rhiannon wrote:

"Rowland McDonnell" wrote:
Rhiannon wrote:

[swnip]

I used to know a man who was a retired MI5 agent and if you
actually
believe
what you said above about your own government, you're very naive.

There have been many incidents in the past which look very much
like
what I've described. But I don't say my government is behind it;
then
again, the spooks don't always do what the government wants (c.f.
spying
on the Wilson government for fear of - well, treachery, really).
Nor do
I believe anything at all. There is puzzling data that needs
explaining. If you think the sort of thing that I've described
doesn't
go on, you're blind to the world around you.

Quite the opposite. NO government is to be trusted, including mine
own
(Canada), but while you're hurling stones at the CIA in the US of A,
it
might serve you to keep in mind that your own clandestine government
sanctioned murders are cold, calculating, and kill with impunity,
including
British citizens.

My government doesn't have any clandestine killers. You've been
reading
too many spy thrillers. The only killers they've got are the ones out
in the open - the Metropolitan Police for innocent Brazilian
electricians, and more serious people when you actually want someone
dangerous dealt with... This isn't France or Israel, you know; and
James Bond isn't real.

I'm not at all convinced that the spooks don't do the odd bit of
murder
occasionally - but not under government direction. And they certainly
wouldn't publicise the matter if they, like the CIA, did things like
slaughter unidentified people in a car from the air on suspicion of
them
`being terrorists' - but the CIA's done that, and boasted about it!

Quite outrageous, but there you go. Our lot are bright enough to try
to
make any killing look like a natural death or suicide at worst - well,
I
hope they do. I'd be very unhappy at them if they weren't careful
like
that - one does at least hope for *competent* spooks, you know?

Whether a goverment is more or less open about what they
do does not change the fact that they're all the same.

Riiight... So the Mugabe government is in all respects effectively
identical to the government of the Swiss canton of Schwyz? And in
their
turn, they're just like William Gladstone's final turn at PM? All of
whom work exactly the same way as the governments of Louis XIV of
France, William the ******* of Normandy (1066 and all that), and those
that ran the Weimar Republic?

I'll give you a few hints: Mugabe is an oppressive dictator who's got
no
idea how to run a country anywhere but into the ground. Switzerland
is
the only democratic nation on the planet and the Swiss run things very
well. And Gladstone was a fruitcake but did his duty as he saw fit...

And never mind the rest... No, all governments are different -
admittedly, they all have things in common, but not a lot.

Don't make the
mistake of thinking you country has some sort of elevated status
that makes
you better than any other. That first step right before the proud
fall is a
big one.

[snip]

But Britain /is/ superior. You seem to forget that this nation has
been
around a long time. We've had our falls - many of them - after the
pride and now we're back up again - again.

Rowland.

--
Remove the animal for email address:
Sorry - the spam got to me
http://www.mag-uk.org http://www.bmf.co.uk
UK biker? Join MAG and the BMF and stop the Eurocrats banning biking

sure you are that's why your subways get blowed up ,
and rabid foxes control the streets , Canada is The King ,
GO MAPLE LEAFS


Rowland is a verbose blow-hard; no-one takes him seriously. He's the
David of UPSD.

On 10/24/07 3:41 PM, in article
, "Rowland
McDonnell" wrote:

cal wrote:

"BradGuth" wrote:

cal wrote:

there's no reason to suppose that the smart/stupid ratio has changed at any
time in history. we've always bumbled along much the same way. one thing
about the stupid, they tend to be robust. as a population, they seem to be
better at survival and to do it more enthusiastically. their extermination,
were it possible, could spell doom for the human race.

Before we learned how to commercially and/or faith-base pillage,
plunder and rape our own kind and the environment at the same time as
we lie our infomercial spewing butts off, humans used to be a whole
lot nicer and really smart at surviving in spite of their having to
live in caves, or worse.

as we get increasingly dumb, we survive longer and in far greater numbers.

You have data to back up this claim?

that we're living longer and in far greater numbers is self-evident. whether
we're getting increasingly dumb is for you to decide.

On 10/24/07 8:00 PM, in article R0RTi.140123$th2.60251@pd7urf3no, "electro"
wrote:

Idiocracy, that was a great movie..

it was ok, but none too subtle. then again, i guess you can't be when you're
talking to a bunch of ...ok, never mind.



"Angelocracy.com" wrote in message
ps.com...
http://angelocracy.blogspot.com/

ANOTHER 'MODEST PROPOSAL
The text below is a copy of a column that was in a high school
newspaper. After the school principal read the column, he confiscated
all copies of the paper. Then had the teacher in charge of the
newspaper removed.

Another 'modest proposal' by Justin Jones
Published on: 10/23/07

For a millennium, the world has been plagued with stupid people
corrupting society and *******izing the value of life for all of
mankind.

The intellectually handicapped have been reproducing at a
substantially greater rate than those with a fully functional brain.

The problem of the unintelligent reproducing is, and has been, a
serious threat to society that has gone unchecked for far too long. It
is the responsibility of man to solve this problem before a reverse
Darwinism takes effect.

It is depressing to think (especially at the high school age) that
people with a high IQ are generally stereotyped as "geeks" or "nerds"
because they choose to do more intellectually stimulating activities
like homework, and reading, instead of those activities preferred by
their peers like power lifting, full contact football without head
protection, or crushing cans on one's head. So while the intelligent
are exiled from the masses, the ignorant are cherished and embraced.

Due to the substantial amount of low IQ reproduction and
relatively low amount of high IQ reproduction, the intelligent become
fewer and farther between.

Since mankind obviously cannot control itself enough to make
strides for the future, the populace spins into an out of control
state of reverse Darwinism where the stupid people survive and the
smart people perish.

Some form of action must be taken, one which can be governed
effectively and immediately to pull a populace from a malevolent
tailspin toward disaster.

First off, charity should be outlawed. No longer should people be
allowed to use their children as a source of income. People who cannot
afford to have kids simply should not have kids. Unemployment benefits
also must be disbanded - go get a job. That isn't to say those with
disabilities should not be helped, but not with handouts, just a hand.
One of the greatest minds of the century, Stephen Hawking, is
immobile. Yet the courageous Mr. Hawking still manages to make strides
in the areas of physics, despite being confined to his wheelchair.

Second, the government should compile a standardized test to
thoroughly analyze any and all 5th grade students in the country for
IQ levels. Based on the results of the test, those who perform in the
bottom 25 percent should be executed. The executions will not be
inhumane; simple lethal injections while one sleeps would be
sufficient. With the bottom of every class systematically removed,
over time the world would inevitably thrive and prosper like never
before.

It is true that, without the unintelligent, there will be no one
to mess up one's order at the local fast food joint, or people on the
news to give one something humorous to talk about at the water cooler
at work the next morning, but that is a sacrifice, as a race, that
simply must be made.

http://angelocracy.blogspot.com/

On 10/24/07 10:03 PM, in article ,
"Fred J. McCall" wrote:

cal wrote:
:
:as we get increasingly dumb, we survive longer and in far greater numbers.
:

That's because the smart people are causing things to advance fast
enough to be defeating natural selection. At some point there won't
be enough of them to do that for all the mass of stupid people and
things will implode.

Dark Ages II, anyone?

i'm game, long as i get to be king.

On 10/24/07 8:08 PM, in article
, "Jane"
wrote:


"kT" wrote in message
...
slunky wrote:

_/ Jane wrote \_
No crap. I mean if it's a thread where he can bash the USA which is ANY
thread he's all over it.

Have you ever seen the episode of South Park where they go to Canada? and
there's a guy there called Scott? Rowland reminds me of him. "That's
Scott. He's a dick."

Rational dicks everywhere want to know how you irrational dicks are going
to pay for the ****ing mess you've created :

http://www.brillig.com/debt_clock/

More oil wars, I suppose.

"I" didn't create anything, I didn't vote for him and neither did millions
of other American's, why don't you direct your angst at Bush and ask him
that rather then generalizing?

it's a concept that probably originated in a time when monarchs were
referred to as their nations in diplomatic discourse. the british monarch
would be called "england", the french monarch would be "france", and so on.
in this sense, bush is "the united states". regardless of who did or didn't
vote for him, he currently represents the american national will outside
your borders for the simple reason that he's empowered to do so and no one
else is.

what a lot of americans don't seem to get is that as far as anyone living
outside the country is concerned, bush IS america. he's not the individual
americans we know... for example, i know *you didn't personally create what
his administration has created... but the individual exceptions are going to
have to stand up and be counted by the world, one american at a time, or be
taken to aquiesce to what your twice-elected leader has done.