kill all the stupid people

"Tim" wrote in message
...
Fred J. McCall wrote:

Any time you want to spit that hook out, you just feel free,
dumbass...



Seeing as how you don't like stupid people how about you put
your money where your mouth is and blow what little brains
you have to smithereens.


I can't resist...

Tim I believe he does that every night into a Kleenex...

"cal" wrote in message
...

On 10/24/07 8:08 PM, in article
, "Jane"
wrote:


"kT" wrote in message
...
slunky wrote:

_/ Jane wrote \_
No crap. I mean if it's a thread where he can bash the USA which is
ANY
thread he's all over it.

Have you ever seen the episode of South Park where they go to Canada?
and
there's a guy there called Scott? Rowland reminds me of him. "That's
Scott. He's a dick."

Rational dicks everywhere want to know how you irrational dicks are
going
to pay for the ****ing mess you've created :

http://www.brillig.com/debt_clock/

More oil wars, I suppose.

"I" didn't create anything, I didn't vote for him and neither did
millions
of other American's, why don't you direct your angst at Bush and ask him
that rather then generalizing?

it's a concept that probably originated in a time when monarchs were
referred to as their nations in diplomatic discourse. the british monarch
would be called "england", the french monarch would be "france", and so
on.
in this sense, bush is "the united states". regardless of who did or
didn't
vote for him, he currently represents the american national will outside
your borders for the simple reason that he's empowered to do so and no one
else is.

what a lot of americans don't seem to get is that as far as anyone living
outside the country is concerned, bush IS america. he's not the individual
americans we know... for example, i know *you didn't personally create
what
his administration has created... but the individual exceptions are going
to
have to stand up and be counted by the world, one american at a time, or
be
taken to aquiesce to what your twice-elected leader has done.


It's so frustrating really... The American's who thought to vote him in
especially for a second term should be more upset then anything, they put
their faith in a monster, me I'm just upset at the American's who put their
faith in him at all.

"Rowland McDonnell" wrote in message
...
slunky wrote:

_/ Rowland McDonnell wrote \_
But Britain /is/ superior. You seem to forget that this nation has
been
around a long time. We've had our falls - many of them - after the
pride and now we're back up again - again.

It must suck to live somewhere where you have to continually reassure
yourself that you're superior.

If you look around, you'll notice that in Britain, we don't do that. We
just *know* that we're superior. No need for big national holidays or
national flag waving or treating the national anthem as anything but a
dreary official tune (the only good verse - the one about beating the
rebellious Scots - is a bit unfashionable these days). We just know
we're better than everyone else[1].


So you're saying your countrymen do not take pride in their county, no
symbolism, no honoring and no celebration?

_/ Jane wrote \_
So you're saying your countrymen do not take pride in their county, no
symbolism, no honoring and no celebration?

Sure he does. America-bashing in newsgroups. It's a long standing
tradition for him.

--
-slunky

"Mally" wrote in message
...

"slunky" wrote in message
...
I said you were backwards, not your country. I'm not a limey
generalizing scumfucc like yourself.

--
-slunky

Damn! seems I have to X-post again. You guys must know by now, I don't
like it, but how will I know the right guy gets to read it, unless I do
X-post.

Anyway, I must admit, I am rather backward myself. Can you explain the
word scumfucc to me, as I don't see an entry in my dictionary for it. I
hope this is not an american swearword, and I am being obtuse here. If it
is some form of american gutter language, then please do not bother
explaining, as I will be content not to know.
I wish you well,
--
Mal
Three fifths of the time or more, I am usually wrong.
So am I drunk or what?



Hi Mally!!!

According to the Slunkster Dictionary published in the good ol'US of slang

I'll break it up for you Scum(i.e. the stuff stuck to a bathtub when it's
not washed out) Fucc(****) or Scumfucc = Rowland

Jane

_/ Jane wrote \_
According to the Slunkster Dictionary published in the good ol'US of slang

I'll break it up for you Scum(i.e. the stuff stuck to a bathtub when it's
not washed out) Fucc(****) or Scumfucc = Rowland

Name give to only those who are lower than the lowest thing you can
think of. Think of the last thing you would ever want to come in contact
with, times 100,000,000,000,000,000,000,000.

--
-slunky

"slunky" wrote in message
...
_/ Rowland McDonnell wrote \_
As I've explained elsewhere, I only bang on like this is response to
ignorant, arrogant Yanks for the purposes of winding them up.

It's a form of humour; I realise that most USAians are deficient in
humour, so it's neccessary to point it out.

Well, I find your attempts funny, and your brainwashed ignorance
hilarious!

Me. And I did win - you did fail to read it all, didn't you?

You bet against yourself? What'd you wager? and I read it all.

chuckle That's your excuse for doing nothing but posting dishonest
and snide remarks that ignore all the relevant issues - mostly because
you simply don't have the mental capacity for comprehending complex
ideas, let alone writing them down.

No, I'm just not a blowhard who "bangs on" because of some kind of
inferiority issues about my country.

cackle Bullseye!

I have touched a raw nerve, haven't I?

Not at all. I could care less what you have to say, you're just my toy
for the moment. Keep on dancing.

You Yanks are quite funny, aren't you?

Yes.

You get the idea that everyone in the world is jealous of your
******** country with its ingrained institutionalised racism (the USA
was founded on the basis of whites lording it over the `lesser' races,
of whom the blacks were to be slaves and the `Indians' were to be
exterminated) and other social iniquity, its unjust laws, its corrupt
government, its massive state-funded (by way of direct purchase and
illegal subsidy) death-tech business, its unsustainable and illegally
subsidised agriculture and business, its appalling environmental
record (the USA is as bad at land desecration as the Warsaw Pact
nations were, but they at least are cleaning up their mess now). It
goes on like this. And oh! The ugliness of it all - ugly cities,
ugly countryside. Ugh!

No, it's just you who's jealous.

Believe it or not, I've never wanted to live in the USA. I have
relatives over there and - well, I know what it's like living in the USA
for real and I do not find the prospect attractive.

Yea, sure. That's why you go on and on about the US.

Backwards, you say? Well, one of us lives in a free country with
universal health care (compare the UK's success in dealing with AIDS to
the dreadful mess in the USA, for example) and a sound welfare state
that does the job properly. And also has an economy in roaringly good
shape, gets on well with its neighbours, has low crime, safe streets,
and so on.

I said you were backwards, not your country. I'm not a limey
generalizing scumfucc like yourself.

Part of the reason the UK economy is doing so well is that the UK is one
of the preferred destinations for Poles and other `new accession' EU
nationals who want to earn some money. They come here, they work like,
well, Poles, earn shed loads of money, and give us bloody good service.
Big wins all round - well, hardly surprising what Poles tending to be
well-educated, intelligent, sophisticated, and incredibly hard-working.
We're not so paranoid about foreigners as you lot in the USA - did you
know that the USA is losing business because of your paranoia about
foreigners? I do know that quite a lot of academic conferences have had
to be moved to venues outside the USA because of the trouble involved in
actually getting permission to attend, and then being allowed in even
when permission has been obtained.

I'm a modern educated European - we've all given up on old-fashioned
narrow-minded nationalism. We also know that Europe is the most
socially advanced and civilised place on the planet. In terms of social
issues, the USA is third world by comparison.

*Yawn*

--
-slunky

Holy go slunky!

--
Rhi

"slunky" wrote in message
...
_/ Jane wrote \_
So you're saying your countrymen do not take pride in their county, no
symbolism, no honoring and no celebration?

Sure he does. America-bashing in newsgroups. It's a long standing
tradition for him.

--
-slunky

Well that's true, I stopped posting in UPSD because if I commented on
anything that "might" contradict Rowland I was a bigot and a liar so rather
then deal with him and his superiority complex, I decided I'd stay where
there is less abuse.

"Rhiannon" wrote in message
...

"slunky" wrote in message
...
_/ Rowland McDonnell wrote \_
As I've explained elsewhere, I only bang on like this is response to
ignorant, arrogant Yanks for the purposes of winding them up.

It's a form of humour; I realise that most USAians are deficient in
humour, so it's neccessary to point it out.

Well, I find your attempts funny, and your brainwashed ignorance
hilarious!

Me. And I did win - you did fail to read it all, didn't you?

You bet against yourself? What'd you wager? and I read it all.

chuckle That's your excuse for doing nothing but posting dishonest
and snide remarks that ignore all the relevant issues - mostly because
you simply don't have the mental capacity for comprehending complex
ideas, let alone writing them down.

No, I'm just not a blowhard who "bangs on" because of some kind of
inferiority issues about my country.

cackle Bullseye!

I have touched a raw nerve, haven't I?

Not at all. I could care less what you have to say, you're just my toy
for the moment. Keep on dancing.

You Yanks are quite funny, aren't you?

Yes.

You get the idea that everyone in the world is jealous of your
******** country with its ingrained institutionalised racism (the USA
was founded on the basis of whites lording it over the `lesser' races,
of whom the blacks were to be slaves and the `Indians' were to be
exterminated) and other social iniquity, its unjust laws, its corrupt
government, its massive state-funded (by way of direct purchase and
illegal subsidy) death-tech business, its unsustainable and illegally
subsidised agriculture and business, its appalling environmental
record (the USA is as bad at land desecration as the Warsaw Pact
nations were, but they at least are cleaning up their mess now). It
goes on like this. And oh! The ugliness of it all - ugly cities,
ugly countryside. Ugh!

No, it's just you who's jealous.

Believe it or not, I've never wanted to live in the USA. I have
relatives over there and - well, I know what it's like living in the USA
for real and I do not find the prospect attractive.

Yea, sure. That's why you go on and on about the US.

Backwards, you say? Well, one of us lives in a free country with
universal health care (compare the UK's success in dealing with AIDS to
the dreadful mess in the USA, for example) and a sound welfare state
that does the job properly. And also has an economy in roaringly good
shape, gets on well with its neighbours, has low crime, safe streets,
and so on.

I said you were backwards, not your country. I'm not a limey
generalizing scumfucc like yourself.

Part of the reason the UK economy is doing so well is that the UK is one
of the preferred destinations for Poles and other `new accession' EU
nationals who want to earn some money. They come here, they work like,
well, Poles, earn shed loads of money, and give us bloody good service.
Big wins all round - well, hardly surprising what Poles tending to be
well-educated, intelligent, sophisticated, and incredibly hard-working.
We're not so paranoid about foreigners as you lot in the USA - did you
know that the USA is losing business because of your paranoia about
foreigners? I do know that quite a lot of academic conferences have had
to be moved to venues outside the USA because of the trouble involved in
actually getting permission to attend, and then being allowed in even
when permission has been obtained.

I'm a modern educated European - we've all given up on old-fashioned
narrow-minded nationalism. We also know that Europe is the most
socially advanced and civilised place on the planet. In terms of social
issues, the USA is third world by comparison.

*Yawn*

--
-slunky

Holy go slunky!

--
Rhi


I was applauding!

gibbet (Rowland McDonnell) wrote:

:Fred J. McCall wrote:
:
: Tim wrote:
:[snip]
:
: Present evidence suggests otherwise.
:
:Present evidence, as analysed by whom, exactly? You? You, with your
:lack of perception, your almost total absence of sophistication, and
:your poor education?
:

Well, if you don't like being taken for an idiot, perhaps you should
try not acting like one?

:
:I don't think we need take your judgements at all seriously.
:

'We'? You've got a turd in your pocket now?

:
:
: Rowland isn't at the back of the queue when it comes to the old grey matter.
:
: I don't believe anyone said he was. Go read it again...
:
:chuckle I see - so calling someone a `dumbass' is not, in your
pinion, equivalent to suggesting that they were at the back of the
:queue when brains were being handed out?
:

Of course not. In fact, I explicitly stated that Tim must have been
standing somewhere behind you.

:
:My word, you have a lot to learn about the English language, don't you?
:I mean, `dumbass' isn't part of my dialect at all, but I know what the
:words mean in context better than you do!
:

Through personal experience in being one, no doubt.

:Rowland.
:
:P.S. I know I shouldn't do this kind of thing, but Fred's such a
:loathesome specimen and such an easy target that I just can't help
:myself.

Another fool who doesn't know where the title of the original article
came from.

Hope you enjoy the feel of that hook in your stomach...


--
"Some people get lost in thought because it's such unfamiliar
territory."
--G. Behn