|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Bughuggger wrote:
Just as a speculation, consider that the ordinary mirror, if it were cheap to make, would not be eight or ten inches, but could be up to fifty inches. Then, if one needed not necessarily a fine wooden tube but instead had merely a large black tent. Then, considering the subject matter, would it then be possible to view detail of the moon with a twenty inch mirror, even if the accuracy was not very good. Thanks for the help. I tell you bughugger, you don't have much experience yet, but you are thinking right! What you don't realize is JUST how accurate a telecope mirror has to be to give an image. The bigger the mirror the bigger the problems! Just the weight of the mirror alone can bend it enough to screw up the image! But one solution is the so-called "rubber mirror" thing. You take an ordinary cheap but flexible mirror that is close to the right shape. Then mount it on an array of piezo actuators that can bend the mirror up and down. Using a laser and feedback into a computer, you can actually send signals to the acutators that literally BEND the mirror into the correct shape. This is an interesting approach to huge mirrors where cost and weight are prohibitive. Note that a parabolic oven mirror only has to be accurate enough to focus to the area of the object to be heated. NOT good enough to look at the moon! Another data point. I own a 36" Schmidt mirror that came out of an old TV projector. A Schmidt mirror is spherical rather than parabolic, but uses a corrector lens to give a sharper focus. This system even WITH the corector plate produces a VERY blurry moon image. Good enough for TV on a screen but sucks for moon pictures. And THIS mirror is glass a couple inches thick and designed for images! But hey, the moon is BRIGHT! You don't need a 20" mirror... you can make a decent telescope out of a large lens with a concave side. Just silver that bowl side and build a telescope! Very instructive and will work! bjacoby PS. If you want to see what we are talking about here, go find one of those 6" or so cosmetic magnifying mirrors women use to put their face on. Set it up as a telescope and you'll see how ineffective an inacurate mirror can be. Also get a sheet of black paper and cut maybe a 1" or so hole in it. Now put that infront of your cheapo mirror and move it around. You'll find that if you cut down the area of the mirror the image will improve as the mirror is more accurate over small areas than the whole thing. -- Due to SPAM innundation above address is turned off! |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
bjakoby:
I tell you bughugger, you don't have much experience yet, but you are thinking right! What you don't realize is JUST how accurate a telecope mirror has to be to give an image. The bigger the mirror the bigger the problems! Just the weight of the mirror alone can bend it enough to screw up the image! But one solution is the so-called "rubber mirror" thing. You take an ordinary cheap but flexible mirror that is close to the right shape. Then mount it on an array of piezo actuators that can bend the mirror up and down. Using a laser and feedback into a computer, you can actually send signals to the acutators that literally BEND the mirror into the correct shape. This is an interesting approach to huge mirrors where cost and weight are prohibitive. Note that a parabolic oven mirror only has to be accurate enough to focus to the area of the object to be heated. NOT good enough to look at the moon! Another data point. I own a 36" Schmidt mirror that came out of an old TV projector. A Schmidt mirror is spherical rather than parabolic, but uses a corrector lens to give a sharper focus. This system even WITH the corector plate produces a VERY blurry moon image. Good enough for TV on a screen but sucks for moon pictures. And THIS mirror is glass a couple inches thick and designed for images! But hey, the moon is BRIGHT! You don't need a 20" mirror... you can make a decent telescope out of a large lens with a concave side. Just silver that bowl side and build a telescope! Very instructive and will work! bjacoby PS. If you want to see what we are talking about here, go find one of those 6" or so cosmetic magnifying mirrors women use to put their face on. Set it up as a telescope and you'll see how ineffective an inacurate mirror can be. Also get a sheet of black paper and cut maybe a 1" or so hole in it. Now put that infront of your cheapo mirror and move it around. You'll find that if you cut down the area of the mirror the image will improve as the mirror is more accurate over small areas than the whole thing. -- Due to SPAM innundation above address is turned off! Thanks a lot. I like to get these general points right. DW |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Imagine you have a parabolic mirror and a large black tent. Would you then be
able to sit inside it, and watch the visions on a mirror in front of it like it was a t.v. screen? DW |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
"Bughuggger" wrote in message ... Imagine you have a parabolic mirror and a large black tent. Would you then be able to sit inside it, and watch the visions on a mirror in front of it like it was a t.v. screen? No. You can watch the images, if you bring them to focus on a surface. This is a 'camera obscura', and was a popular device in Victorian times. Best Wishes |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
ED refractor lenses | Michael | Amateur Astronomy | 4 | January 14th 04 10:44 PM |
commercial manufacture of lenses and mirrors | Allan Adler | Astronomy Misc | 0 | January 1st 04 03:07 AM |
What's the difference between shorty and long barlow lenses? | Bluewater | UK Astronomy | 1 | October 24th 03 05:33 AM |
Is this FOV calculator okay for telescope lenses? | Richard | UK Astronomy | 14 | August 26th 03 04:16 PM |