|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
"What's the most important issue?" Legislators,Pundits & 9/11Controlled Demolition Questions
On Saturday, October 19, 2013 6:17:27 AM UTC-7, Rocky wrote:
In the following video a bunch of people on CSPAN are questioned about 9/11 and watch them run, lie or duck. "What's the most important issue?" Legislators,Pundits & 9/11 Controlled Demolition Questions Part 4 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RryusiAHm8s Maybe the rethink 9/11 group would be better off if they addressed the bodies being blown to bits instead of crushed because that certainly proves explosives were used. See: http://norcaltruth.org/2010/06/23/over-70-body-parts-from-911-on-found-on-new-york-city-streets-yes-in-2010/ Maybe rethink 9/11 should ask for a "real" investigation instead of a "new" investigation because the first investigations didn't address why any of the buildings at the World Trade Center were so completely destroyed as if they were controlled demolitions. Maybe rethink 9/11 should address why the sound of cutter charges made it to a news broadcast but only one video that did not come from wtcdata.nist.gov shows the cutter charges that people in the news broadcast heard. Audio evidence of cutter charges in WTC 7: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ERhoNYj9_fg Visual evidence of cutter charges in WTC 7: http://youtu.be/k2Trj_5J02k?t=1m38s Maybe rethink 9/11 should address all the white flashes and other issues that are raised in the following video: 9/11 WTC Controlled Demolition Compilation http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HEJbInxwAe8 Any other ideas? TIA Rocky Blown to bits is apparently not of sufficient objective forensics to suggest anything. Is our government good at their cloak and dagger skulduggery damage-control, or what. Just like those submarines operating directly below a confirmed drone target plane that TWA-800 just so happened to get in the way (aka flying within the same airspace), and naturally all DoD/Pentagon records of such having vanished. Raytheon plus numerous subcontractors like TRW are each contractors for creating those STINGERS, of which R&D variations can disable their targets by way of creating a cool shockwave. DoD contractors are required to demonstrate each level of their R&D advancements in order to qualify for continued funding, and of course all of that documentation is kept behind MIC closed door that not even our President has access to. Our MIC/DoD/NSA/CIA/Pentagon supplied OBL and others with earlier versions of these WMD, with the soul intent of killing as many Russians as possible, because those Russians were interfering with their supply of Taliban drugs.. http://thelede.blogs.nytimes.com/200...misfires/?_r=0 Those Stingers as well Russian, UK, French and German variations are each capable of delivering a lethal shockwave as capable of disabling a 747. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Journal special issue: "The Search For Life in the Universe." | Robert Clark | Astronomy Misc | 0 | May 29th 10 09:29 AM |
just THREE YEARS AFTER my "CREWLESS Space Shuttle" article, theNSF """experts""" discover the idea of an unmanned Shuttle to fill the2010-2016 cargo-to-ISS (six+ years) GAP | gaetanomarano | Policy | 3 | September 15th 08 04:47 PM |
and now, Ladies and Gentlemen, the NSF "slow motion experts" have(finally) "invented" MY "Multipurpose Orbital Rescue Vehicle"... just 20 | gaetanomarano | Policy | 9 | August 30th 08 12:05 AM |