|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#501
|
|||
|
|||
Earth w/o Moon / by Brad Guth
On May 13, 2:20 pm, "Scott Hedrick" wrote:
"Pat Flannery" wrote in message dakotatelephone... He's going to claim the Moon only recently went into Earth orbit - a few thousand years ago, no doubt brought here by aliens. :-) So, then, the Moon was an alien nuclear waste dumping ground? ** Posted fromhttp://www.teranews.com** That's entirely possible, especially since it's so gamma producing like no other moon, planet or even that of our sun. An icy proto-moon is also providing a darn good interstellar craft, as well as nicely thermal insulated and otherwise ideally shielded from cosmic and local gamma. Must also be the reason(s) why most everything of JAXA/Selene has become so unusually taboo/nondisclosure rated. BTW, the 2e20 N/sec worth of holding onto our moon is always twice as tidal force worthy as our sun. If that mutual tidal force of 2e20 N/ sec were converted into hourly energy, it's absolutely impressive as all get out, even if only 0.0001% of that force--energy becomes global warming worthy. If our trusty moon were to be relocated out to Earth's L1, and interactively kept there for obtaining roughly 3+% worth of solar isolation, as such we'd still have half the amount of tidal action to deal with. Because that relocated moon always being in alignment with our sun, those ocean tides would never change amplitude or their 24 hour cycle. If the moon were somehow to be eliminated, we'd still have roughly a third the tidal action, but at least our badly polluted environment would then be having a singular 24 hour tidal cycle that was always as regular as high noon, and lowest tides as regular as midnight, as well as Earth would be getting extremely cold from the inside out. Those supercomputer simulations would have easily proven all of this out, but sadly they are taboo/nondisclosure or simply DARPA need-to-know rated. It seems them nifty Google-Groups gold stars are no longer working, at least not for me. One of my lose cannons must have nailed their DARPA status quo (upsetting their apple cart or rocking their good ship LOLLIPOP). Of course few if none others were into giving out those gold stars, no matters how interesting the contributed topic or reply. When so much of DARPA/newsgroups are of such silly or intentionally misleading/diversion topics, it’s interesting how the really good topics or replies can’t seem to be given any of them Google-Groups gold stars. I wonder why them DARPA Gods of Usenet/newsgroups are upset enough to banish them gold stars. Brad Guth Brad_Guth Brad.Guth BradGuth |
#502
|
|||
|
|||
Earth w/o Moon / by Brad Guth
On Jun 7, 12:37*pm, BradGuth wrote:
That's entirely possible, especially since it's so gamma producing like no other moon, planet or even that of our sun. Cite. Links please. You once said the moon was extremely salty. Cite. Links please. Thanks. |
#503
|
|||
|
|||
Earth w/o Moon / by Brad Guth
On Jun 9, 1:40*pm, wrote:
On Jun 7, 12:37*pm, BradGuth wrote: That's entirely possible, especially since it's so gamma producing like no other moon, planet or even that of our sun. Cite. Links please. You once said the moon was extremely salty. Cite. Links please. Thanks. Cite yourself. Our NASA supposedly took pictures within the gamma spectrum, and our moon indicated as rather nicely gamma worthy as all get out. I think most of that gamma was secondary/recoil photons, although some of that gamma must have been directly from the radioactive moon itself. The sodium cloud that surrounds our moon by more than 8r, and trails by 900,000 km may be of the metallic mineral of sodium, although the extremely low density of the moon's core might otherwise suggest there's plain old salt that's sequestered below that unusually thick crust. Earth seems to have received way more than its fair share of salt. So, where's the moon salt hiding, and for that matter where's all the Mars salt hiding?? - Brad Guth |
#504
|
|||
|
|||
Earth w/o Moon / by Brad Guth
On Jun 9, 1:40*pm, wrote:
Cite. Links please. You once said the moon was extremely salty. Cite. Links please. Thanks. Mr. Guth neither cites nor researches. He simply asserts. Apparently, his unpublished "subjective opinion" -- which at this point I am forced to read as "made up out of whole cloth" -- is supposed to be worth more to us than published, objective findings from generations of professionals. (Not to mention plain common sense.) We established this at least as far back as the "there are no Paleolithic depictions of the Moon" farce...and probably farther back than that. Why is this thread still active? |
#505
|
|||
|
|||
Earth w/o Moon / by Brad Guth
On Jun 9, 8:42*pm, BradGuth wrote:
On Jun 9, 1:40*pm, wrote: On Jun 7, 12:37*pm, BradGuth wrote: That's entirely possible, especially since it's so gamma producing like no other moon, planet or even that of our sun. Cite. Links please. You once said the moon was extremely salty. Cite. Links please. Thanks. Cite yourself. Our NASA supposedly took pictures within the gamma spectrum, and our Only word worth any of your gamma salt is "supposedly." I have n-ASS-a moon rocks - $1,000ea. Ca$h only. moon indicated as rather nicely gamma worthy as all get out. *I think most of that gamma was secondary/recoil photons, although some of that gamma must have been directly from the radioactive moon itself. The sodium cloud that surrounds our moon by more than 8r, and trails by 900,000 km may be of the metallic mineral of sodium, although the extremely low density of the moon's core might otherwise suggest there's plain old salt that's sequestered below that unusually thick crust. Earth seems to have received way more than its fair share of salt. wrt what? your french fries? So, where's the moon salt hiding, and for that matter where's all the Mars salt hiding?? Where's those sources hiding I requested? |
#506
|
|||
|
|||
Earth w/o Moon / by Brad Guth
In article
, Damien Valentine wrote: On Jun 9, 1:40*pm, wrote: Cite. Links please. You once said the moon was extremely salty. Cite. Links please. Thanks. Mr. Guth neither cites nor researches. He simply asserts. Apparently, his unpublished "subjective opinion" -- which at this point I am forced to read as "made up out of whole cloth" Woven paper towels, I'd say. -- is supposed to be worth more to us than published, objective findings from generations of professionals. (Not to mention plain common sense.) We established this at least as far back as the "there are no Paleolithic depictions of the Moon" farce...and probably farther back than that. Why is this thread still active? It was quiet for a while, but Brad keeps coming back to scratch at the scab, to see if he can get anyone else to bite. I've made a practice of ignoring any post in which he scampers off into the weeds about DARPA, the Nazis, the Zionists, or any permutation thereof. If he wants to be taken seriously, then he can act that way. If he wants to be mistaken for a kook, then he should go on making kooky concatenations of calamitous cabals. -- Timberwoof me at timberwoof dot com http://www.timberwoof.com "When you post sewage, don't blame others for emptying chamber pots in your direction." ‹Chris L. |
#507
|
|||
|
|||
Earth w/o Moon / by Brad Guth
On Jun 10, 10:22 am, Damien Valentine wrote:
On Jun 9, 1:40 pm, wrote: Cite. Links please. You once said the moon was extremely salty. Cite. Links please. Thanks. Mr.Guth neither cites nor researches. He simply asserts. Apparently, his unpublished "subjective opinion" -- which at this point I am forced to read as "made up out of whole cloth" -- is supposed to be worth more to us than published, objective findings from generations of professionals. (Not to mention plain common sense.) We established this at least as far back as the "there are no Paleolithic depictions of the Moon" farce...and probably farther back than that. Why is this thread still active? I've always given credit where credit was due. Why bother to make stuff up, when some of our best science comes directly via your DARPA/NASA? Of course, having an independent mind that can deductively connect the dots is kinda necessary, whereas your mindset is kinda like used toilet paper. Why not run computer simulations? Why is JAXA/Selene taboo/nondisclosure rated? Why is Venus so unusually taboo/nondisclosure rated? - Brad Guth Brad_Guth Brad.Guth BradGuth David Grinspoon quotes: http://thinkexist.com/quotes/david_grinspoon/ “We're ignorant of life in the universe. We only have one planet that serves as an example and in science it's not good to derive information from a sample size of one.” |
#508
|
|||
|
|||
Earth w/o Moon / by Brad Guth
On Jun 10, 9:38 pm, wrote:
On Jun 9, 8:42 pm, BradGuth wrote: On Jun 9, 1:40 pm, wrote: On Jun 7, 12:37 pm, BradGuth wrote: That's entirely possible, especially since it's so gamma producing like no other moon, planet or even that of our sun. Cite. Links please. You once said the moon was extremely salty. Cite. Links please. Thanks. Cite yourself. Our NASA supposedly took pictures within the gamma spectrum, and our Only word worth any of your gamma salt is "supposedly." I have n-ASS-a moon rocks - $1,000ea. Ca$h only. Are you now admitting that our NASA lied to us? What's "gamma salt"? (mos DARPA damage-control) moon indicated as rather nicely gamma worthy as all get out. I think most of that gamma was secondary/recoil photons, although some of that gamma must have been directly from the radioactive moon itself. The sodium cloud that surrounds our moon by more than 8r, and trails by 900,000 km may be of the metallic mineral of sodium, although the extremely low density of the moon's core might otherwise suggest there's plain old salt that's sequestered below that unusually thick crust. Earth seems to have received way more than its fair share of salt. wrt what? your french fries? So, where's the moon salt hiding, and for that matter where's all the Mars salt hiding?? Where's those sources hiding I requested? If Mars had salt; would not that have been one of the very first of most basic elements discovered and quantified? If we'd walked on the physically dark moon; besides blinded by the vibrant look of Venus, wouldn't we have noticed all the remainders of salt, and otherwise noticed the terrific vapors of sodium leaving that gamma saturated moon of ours? Why isn't there any science as to raw ice in space? - Brad Guth Brad_Guth Brad.Guth BradGuth David Grinspoon quotes: http://thinkexist.com/quotes/david_grinspoon/ “We're ignorant of life in the universe. We only have one planet that serves as an example and in science it's not good to derive information from a sample size of one.” |
#509
|
|||
|
|||
Earth w/o Moon / by Brad Guth
On Jun 10, 10:58 pm, Timberwoof
wrote: In article , Damien Valentine wrote: On Jun 9, 1:40 pm, wrote: Cite. Links please. You once said the moon was extremely salty. Cite. Links please. Thanks. Mr.Guthneither cites nor researches. He simply asserts. Apparently, his unpublished "subjective opinion" -- which at this point I am forced to read as "made up out of whole cloth" Woven paper towels, I'd say. -- is supposed to be worth more to us than published, objective findings from generations of professionals. (Not to mention plain common sense.) We established this at least as far back as the "there are no Paleolithic depictions of the Moon" farce...and probably farther back than that. Why is this thread still active? It was quiet for a while, butBradkeeps coming back to scratch at the scab, to see if he can get anyone else to bite. I've made a practice of ignoring any post in which he scampers off into the weeds about DARPA, the Nazis, the Zionists, or any permutation thereof. If he wants to be taken seriously, then he can act that way. If he wants to be mistaken for a kook, then he should go on making kooky concatenations of calamitous cabals. -- Timberwoof me at timberwoof dot comhttp://www.timberwoof.com "When you post sewage, don't blame others for emptying chamber pots in your direction." ‹Chris L. You'd like us to believe that no such faith-based group is ever in charge of anything, and that our government doesn't make mistakes or much less tells us lies. Have you told that funny one to our resident LLPOF warlord(GW Bush)? Your MI5/CIA~DARPA/NASA and their Zionist/Nazi army of brown-nosed minions appreciates those damage-control efforts of keeping us snookered and dumbfounded. Your bonus check is in the mail, and you can now go back to the usual status quo of perpetrating cold and hot wars, killing off innocent folks and otherwise inflating the cost of energy. - Brad Guth Brad_Guth Brad.Guth BradGuth |
#510
|
|||
|
|||
Earth w/o Moon / by Brad Guth
On Jun 11, 5:45*am, BradGuth wrote:
Are you now admitting that our NASA lied to us? oh heaven's noooooo diversion noted What's "gamma salt"? (mos DARPA damage-control) look it up diversion noted If Mars had salt; *would not that have been one of the very first of most basic elements discovered and quantified? now onto mars .. diversion noted If we'd walked on the physically dark moon; *besides blinded by the vibrant look of Venus, wouldn't we have noticed all the remainders of salt, and otherwise noticed the terrific vapors of sodium leaving that gamma saturated moon of ours? now venus so we walked on the moon - you spin in every direction Why isn't there any science as to raw ice in space? google "comet" |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Earth w/o Moon / by Brad Guth | BradGuth | Policy | 523 | June 20th 08 07:17 PM |
Aliens based on moon Brad Guth please review | LIBERATOR | Space Shuttle | 39 | April 22nd 06 08:40 AM |
Aliens based on moon Brad Guth please review | honestjohn | Misc | 2 | April 19th 06 05:55 PM |
Moon is less hot by earthshine, says Brad Guth / IEIS~GASA | Ami Silberman | History | 13 | December 15th 03 08:13 PM |
Moon is less hot by earthshine, says Brad Guth / IEIS~GASA | Ami Silberman | Astronomy Misc | 13 | December 15th 03 08:13 PM |