NASA Searches For A Snowball In Hell

http://www.rense.com/general62/inhell.htm

On Sun, 30 Jan 2005 07:49:03 +1100, "HenryK"
wrote:

http://www.rense.com/general62/inhell.htm



Mcanney's an idiot. one simple word: Spectroscopes.

Rense is not a source of truth and knowledge.

--

Find out about Australia's most dangerous Doomsday Cult:
http://users.bigpond.net.au/wanglese/pebble.htm

"You can't fool me, it's turtles all the way down."

"Fredrick Garvin" wrote in message
news
On Sun, 30 Jan 2005 07:49:03 +1100, HenryK expelled the following:

http://www.rense.com/general62/inhell.htm


Oh THAT site is respectable.......NOT!!

Forget about the site, and try to be open minded.
Never accept or deny anything 100%, otherwise your mind gets into dead-ends,
and you become a dead-head.
That's the problem with most science/scientists, they look for proof of
theories, instead of looking for truth per se.

"Fredrick Garvin" wrote in message
news
On Sun, 30 Jan 2005 10:44:35 +1100, HenryK expelled the following:

"Fredrick Garvin" wrote in message
news
On Sun, 30 Jan 2005 07:49:03 +1100, HenryK expelled the following:

http://www.rense.com/general62/inhell.htm


Oh THAT site is respectable.......NOT!!

Forget about the site, and try to be open minded.
Never accept or deny anything 100%, otherwise your mind gets into
dead-ends,
and you become a dead-head.
That's the problem with most science/scientists, they look for proof of
theories, instead of looking for truth per se.


Lick me.


I rest my case.

On Sun, 30 Jan 2005 10:44:35 +1100, "HenryK"
wrote:

"Fredrick Garvin" wrote in message
news
On Sun, 30 Jan 2005 07:49:03 +1100, HenryK expelled the following:

http://www.rense.com/general62/inhell.htm


Oh THAT site is respectable.......NOT!!

Forget about the site, and try to be open minded.
Never accept or deny anything 100%, otherwise your mind gets into dead-ends,
and you become a dead-head.
That's the problem with most science/scientists, they look for proof of
theories, instead of looking for truth per se.



ROFL!!! That's the dumbest sentence about science I've read in
months.


McCanney is an idiot, by the way, as anyone with a spectroscope can
attest. Of course, millions of amateur and professional astronomers
around the world are all part of a fraud organised by NASA.

Go here for some knowledge, and avoid the crackpot sites. You might
actually learn something:

http://www.badastronomy.com/bad/misc...ney/index.html

--

Find out about Australia's most dangerous Doomsday Cult:
http://users.bigpond.net.au/wanglese/pebble.htm

"You can't fool me, it's turtles all the way down."

In message , HenryK
writes
"Fredrick Garvin" wrote in message
news
On Sun, 30 Jan 2005 07:49:03 +1100, HenryK expelled the following:

http://www.rense.com/general62/inhell.htm


Oh THAT site is respectable.......NOT!!

Forget about the site, and try to be open minded.
Never accept or deny anything 100%, otherwise your mind gets into dead-ends,
and you become a dead-head.
That's the problem with most science/scientists, they look for proof of
theories, instead of looking for truth per se.

We leave Truth to religion and politics. Rense is a well-known kook
site.

"McCanney thinks our earth and the other planets were originally comets
that were drawn from their more elliptical orbits into more circular
orbits. He is also quick to credit another maverick thinker who preceded
him: Immanuel Velikovsky."

Let's see now. a _huge_ comet is about the size of Rhode Island. 1 km
across is more likely - 10^12 kg. A planet is just a bit bigger. 10^12 x
bigger.

And his electrical theory is untenable (cue Eric Crew).
--
Support the DEC Tsunami Appeal http://www.dec.org.uk/.
Remove spam and invalid from address to reply.

"HenryK" wrote in message
...
"Fredrick Garvin" wrote in message
news
On Sun, 30 Jan 2005 07:49:03 +1100, HenryK expelled the following:

http://www.rense.com/general62/inhell.htm


Oh THAT site is respectable.......NOT!!

Forget about the site, and try to be open minded.
Never accept or deny anything 100%, otherwise your mind gets into
dead-ends,
and you become a dead-head.
That's the problem with most science/scientists, they look for proof
of
theories, instead of looking for truth per se.


An explanation for anyone who is inclined to believe HenryK.

The referred webpage proposes that there is no water ice in comets, and
that although people have looked for water, they've not found it.

In fact there is clear evidence for water and a google search for comet
+ molecular + spectrum (note no presupposition of water) finds the
following

http://adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/np...p;db_key=A ST
quote "Finally, CO(+) and H2O(+) emissions first increased in intensity
and then decreased in the tail, which displayed an abundance of water
vapor. " end quote

also
http://quasar.la.asu.edu/comets/hale-bopp.html
quote "Also present in the plasma tail spectrum are weak features due to
ionized water (H2O+) " end quote

Wally Anglesea™ wrote:

On Sun, 30 Jan 2005 07:49:03 +1100, "HenryK"
wrote:

http://www.rense.com/general62/inhell.htm



Mcanney's an idiot. one simple word: Spectroscopes.

Read up on James McCanney's nonsense he

http://www.badastronomy.com/bad/misc/mccanney/index.html


Rense is not a source of truth and knowledge.

An understatement.

--
"a photon can travel faster than light when it is not excited"
"Ions are attracted to IRON"
"The dense ions in the ionosphere are simulating a
much higher gravitational pull to earth."
-- Alexa Cameron demonstrates her 200+ alien-implanted IQ

"...a fascist pig who deserves to be hung by
the neck until dead for treason against the
United States of America."
-- Alexa shows her boundless love for those who disagree with her

On Sun, 30 Jan 2005 07:49:03 +1100, HenryK expelled the following:

http://www.rense.com/general62/inhell.htm


Oh THAT site is respectable.......NOT!!

Forget about the site, and try to be open minded.
Never accept or deny anything 100%, otherwise your mind gets into
dead-ends,
and you become a dead-head.
That's the problem with most science/scientists, they look for proof of
theories, instead of looking for truth per se.

Naw, I think they simply don't want to hang out with and engage netloons in
conversations that netloons like rense don't really understand.

Clear Skies

Chuck Taylor
Do you observe the moon?
Try http://groups.yahoo.com/group/lunar-observing/

************************************

On Sun, 30 Jan 2005 10:59:40 +1100, "HenryK"
wrote:

"Fredrick Garvin" wrote in message
news
On Sun, 30 Jan 2005 10:44:35 +1100, HenryK expelled the following:

"Fredrick Garvin" wrote in message
news On Sun, 30 Jan 2005 07:49:03 +1100, HenryK expelled the following:

http://www.rense.com/general62/inhell.htm


Oh THAT site is respectable.......NOT!!

Forget about the site, and try to be open minded.
Never accept or deny anything 100%, otherwise your mind gets into
dead-ends,
and you become a dead-head.
That's the problem with most science/scientists, they look for proof of
theories, instead of looking for truth per se.


Lick me.


I rest my case.


You didn't have a case to begin with. HTH.
--

Find out about Australia's most dangerous Doomsday Cult:
http://users.bigpond.net.au/wanglese/pebble.htm

"You can't fool me, it's turtles all the way down."