A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Space Science » Policy
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Is there water on the Moon, or isn't there?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old June 20th 09, 02:26 AM posted to sci.space.policy
Jonathan
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 215
Default Is there water on the Moon, or isn't there?


"BradGuth" wrote in message
...


Be so kind as to show me the properly enlarged image that you're
using.



I've come to a very strongly held conclusion that viewing images
of other planets is the ultimate of all Rorschach tests!

And I'm starting to come to the conclusion that our perception of
reality is as important or more than reality itself. .


~ BG



  #2  
Old June 20th 09, 03:42 AM posted to sci.space.policy
BradGuth
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 21,544
Default Is there water on the Moon, or isn't there?

On Jun 19, 6:26*pm, "Jonathan" wrote:
"BradGuth" wrote in message

...

Be so kind as to show me the properly enlarged image that you're
using.


I've come to a very strongly held conclusion that viewing images
of other planets is the ultimate of all Rorschach tests!

And I'm starting to come to the conclusion that our perception of
reality is as important or more than reality itself. .

~ BG


In other words, you couldn't even be bothered with using a free
download of PhotoZoom, much less to actually resample/enlarge the area
of that image that I've specified.

How is it that you are such a photographic expert, especially when you
can't even accomplish the most fundamental basics of digital image
processing?

btw; You do realize that moon water/ice is just another ruse.

LRO; Apollo impacts and their debris soon to be identified (at least
that’s the plan).

Our spendy LRO is up, up and away. Finally, there’s absolutely no
excuse whatsoever for not detecting each and every significant Apollo
item that’s bright and shiny while situated upon such a naked surface
that’s crystal dry, electrostatic charged, generally reactive and
nearly dark as coal. The undisclosed dynamic range of their primary
imager should knock our socks off, whereas even earthshine
illumination should be entirely sufficient, as well as whatever
desired color/hue saturation at less resolution shouldn’t be a problem
unless they intentionally assign false colors.

At the altitude of 50 km (30–70 km polar orbit) it should offer 0.5
meter resolution. Better resolution that’s technically within NASA
and DARPA capability may have to remain restricted, as well as other
science data may have to be need-to-know (same as the JAXA and ISRO
missions).

~ BG
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
What if(on Moon water) G=EMC^2 Glazier[_1_] Misc 28 December 6th 08 05:54 AM
WATER WATER WATER FOR AUSTRALIA... HOPELESSLY PRAYING MR HOWARD [email protected] Astronomy Misc 3 February 11th 07 11:57 AM
Water on the moon or Mars, part-2, water on your brain, you torture for microsoft, don't you? Matt Wiser History 0 December 28th 05 08:12 AM
Water on the moon or Mars, part-2, water on your brain, you torture for microsoft, don't you? OM History 0 December 26th 05 09:02 PM
Moon Water Joe Strout Policy 13 January 17th 04 10:52 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:21 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.