|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Temperature and thrust of SABRE engine core
Calculating the temperature after combustion in SABRE core combustion
chamber involves calculating the energy inputs and using the specific heat of the exhaust components. Unfortunately, specific heats of gasses are not constant over the kind of temperatures we're discussing. I'm using http://www.engineeringtoolbox.com/nitrogen-d_977.html http://www.engineeringtoolbox.com/wa...por-d_979.html SABRE preheats its air and hydrogen inputs to 692.5K, so any energy deriving from combustion heats the exhaust gas from that temperature to a resulting temperature T. The simplest way to calculate T is to use the average specific heats over the range 692.5 to T. Of course, to determine that you already need to know T. Fortunately I do, and the corresponding average specific heats in kJ/kgK, are Nitrogen 1.248 Water Vapour 2.673 This can be checked by the reader, if they're so motivated, once T is calculated below. I'm taking Air to be, by mass, 1.29% argon, 23.14% oxygen, and the rest nitrogen, so we'll also need the specific heat of Argon, which is unvarying at 0.520. We can do this calculation with any amount of air and hydrogen. For simplicity, I'll do it with 1kg of air. 1kg of air contains 0.231 kg of Oxygen, which will burn 0.029 kg of hydrogen to produce 0.260 kg of water vapour. Water vapour's enthalpy of formation, into the gas phase, is 241.82 kJ/mole. The molecular weight is 18.02, so there are 14.46 moles, and thus 3497.5 kJ released when the hydrogen and oxygen combine. The exhaust consists of 0.7557 kg Nitrogen, 0.26 kg of water vapour, and 0.0129 kg of Argon, totaling 1.0268 kg. The average specific heat of the three combined is obtained by taking the average specific heats of the components, weighted according to their masses. That is (0.7557 * 1.248 + 0.26 * 2.673 + 0.0129 * 0.52) / 1.0268 This comes to 1.6 kJ/kgK. Divide the 3497.5 kJ by 1.6kJ, and by the total mass of the exhaust, and we get a temperature rise of 2125 degrees. Add that to the 692.5 we started with, and the total is 2817. So the combustion chamber temperature for the SABRE core is 2817K. This is perhaps surprisingly high, but it must be remembered that the input air hydrogen were already very hot to begin with. This value is of course the T used in calculating the average specific heats. It should be noted that the specific heat tables contained a caveat about dissociation 1500K and we're well past that. The combustion product will not really be just combination of nitrogen and steam, but will contain a variety of other substances which will reduce the real temperature. That said, we can go a step further, and seek to calculate the exhaust velocity, and thus the thrust. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/De_lava...t_gas_velocity The value of k, the isoentropic expansion factor, is a problem, but for this purpose let's take it as 1.4. Looking at the air breathing ascent data in http://www.reactionengines.co.uk/dow...ory_output.xls at 600 seconds after launch, there is a time when almost no air is bypassing the core. At that point the ambient pressure is about 2207 Pa, which is about 1/45 bar. The SABRE chamber pressure is 105 bar. The average molecular weight of the exaust (i.e. the component molecular weights weighted by the respective masses) is 24.64. We now have all the numbers to fit into the exhaust velocity equation. The result comes to 2462 m/s. Going back to the spread sheet, and we see that the air passed into the core in kg/s is 380.198 - 14.40845, or about 363, per nacelle The thrust is then 893706N per nacelle, or about 1.79 MN. This somewhat shy of the stated 2.09 MN, but it's in the right area. But given the rate of air flow, we can calculate the amount of hydrogen consumed, and the result is 21kg/sec, which is much less than the 61kg/sec given in the spread sheet as the rate of mass loss. I'll leave the ramifications of that, and the high combustion temperature, until later. Sylvia. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Temperature and thrust of SABRE engine core
On 15/05/2012 12:21 AM, Sylvia Else wrote:
Going back to the spread sheet, and we see that the air passed into the core in kg/s is 380.198 - 14.40845, or about 363, per nacelle The thrust is then 893706N per nacelle, or about 1.79 MN. This somewhat shy of the stated 2.09 MN, but it's in the right area. Oops - for every kg into the nacelle, there's 1.0268 kg of exhaust, so the thrust is 2 * 363 * 1.0268 * 2462 N, or about 1.84MN. Sylvia. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Skylon Sabre tests | Anthony Frost | Policy | 78 | May 12th 12 04:57 AM |
SABRE vs. Scramjet | Anne Onime | Policy | 1 | May 31st 11 01:55 AM |
Sabre engine - pressure ratio issues | Sylvia Else | Policy | 8 | July 24th 07 04:18 AM |
Last ion engine thrust puts ESA's SMART-1 on the right track for its Moon encounter | Jacques van Oene | News | 0 | October 18th 04 11:38 PM |
Nexus Rocket Engine Test Successful; 10 Times More Thrust Than Deep Space 1 Engine and Lasts 3 Times Longer (10 years) | [email protected] | Technology | 5 | December 30th 03 07:44 PM |