|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
A Hitchhiker's Guide to the Moon
BTW; I love their picture of all the portland cement and corn meal
reflecting at 55+%. That's actually a really fifty near-white zone that's apparently situated on the backside of the moon so that we can't otherwise see it from Earth, certainly not from KECK nor from Hubble. In fact, not even the NASA/Apollo images from orbit or via any subsequent orbiting satellite has yet to identify such a highly reflective area of albedo. And, I wonder where the heck all of the strewn meteorites and impact related shards of basalt have gone, not to mention the carbon, iron and titanium dust that's nowhere to being seen. http://science.nasa.gov/headlines/y2...nbuggy_big.jpg http://science.nasa.gov/headlines/y2...htm?list109700 Perhap you can answer a few simple questions about the portion of the raw solar influx spectrum that's merely contributing to the already hot and nasty lunar environment, of contributing loads of near-UV(near-blue photons) and of what all of the fully UV spectrum had to offer in the way of creating loads of secondary/recoil photons. It seems that when the cloak and dagger troops of the MI6/NSA (aka NASA/Apollo) borg collective 'took the assignment' of officially topic/author stalking and bashing anything and everything I was having to say, apparently their incest borg collective didn't bother as to think first about consulting with the likes of their supposedly independent all-knowing NASA/Apollo borg/wizard 'Jay Windley'. This folling new and improved rant is actually 100% Jay Windley's idea, as it was one of his all-knowing staff and even that of himself indirectly insisting without ever sharing specifics that our terrestrial satellites obtained at least some portion of their X-ray instrument calibrations off our solar impacted moon, which up until then I'd no idea that our moon was so darn reactive and thus secondary/recoil hot and hasty. It seems those moon hard-X-rays can become downright pesky if not lethal. From an orbit above Earth is where our terrestrial satellite instruments take another calibration of hard-X-ray dosage by way of what's being emitted off our solar illuminated and reasonably reactive moon (reactive because of it's size, average density and having such a slight amount of atmosphere), whereas by lunar day is where a substantial amount of secondary/recoil photons of hard-X-ray energy is well documented via all sorts of instruments and even by NASA's ROSAT having made images available as compared to the relatively quiet lunar nighttime and/or earthshine portion of the moon's surface that's not sharing much of anything other than relatively low cosmic background and certainly a few gamma ray induced X-rays. http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/ap960929.html "This X-Ray image of the Moon was made by the orbiting Roentgen Observatory Satellite (ROSAT) in 1990. It shows three distinct regions: a bright X-ray sky, a bright part of the Moon, and a relatively dark part of the Moon. The bright X-ray sky is due to the diffuse cosmic X-ray background." As based on an extremely modest level, and without taking further into account for whatever the Van Allen buffer zone that's entirely within the fist half leg of the distance as providing a zero worth of attenuation (not all that likely the case), then as for our using their very own standard formula as per square of the distance as for reverse-calculating the secondary/recoil radiation as being a factor of supposedly getting four times as intense for each half reduction in the distance is what creates the following results. 384,000 km = 1 extra mr/day (a lunar millirad taken from being less than 400 km above Earth) 192,000 km = 4 extra mr/day (excluding whatever Van Allen belt attenuation factors) 96,000 km = 16 mr/day 48,000 km = 64 mr/day 24,000 km = 256 mr/day 12,000 km = 1024 mr/day *6,000 km = 4096 mr/day *3,000 km = 16,384 mr/day *1,500 km = 65,536 mr/day * 750 km = 262,144 mr/day * 375 km = 1,048,576 mr/d (1048 rads/day, or 10.48 Sv/day) * Of course it's a wee bit more complex because we'll need to start subtracting as based upon getting closer and closer to the lunar surface because there's simply fewer secondary radiating m2 to work from that are capable of sharing their worth of TBI X-ray dosage. Thus knowing the starting dosage/day and of what amount is attenuated by the Van Allen zone becomes essential if we're to believe in the numbers that should actually become greater than what I've suggested. Too bad that we still have not the required technology of deploying one interactive scientific instrument as situated upon our moon. Notice that I've slao learned and verified that it supposedly takes (by way of government as well as various independent standards) 0.7"(18 mm) worth of lead in order to cut hard-X-ray dosage in half. The process of orbiting the moon is by itself going to cut your time of exposure in half, which is still somewhat testy considering that our Apollo missions supposedly cruised to within slightly better than 100 km away from the moon, not to mention many having strolled about the lunar surface for hours on end as nearly naked to the likes of hard-X-rays, and not to otherwise mention upon a good amount of their getting bathed in secondary/recoil dosage of near-blue photons that should have been easily recorded by each one of their unfiltered Kodak eyes (meaning conventional film that's actually quite photo-chemical/dye sensitive to the considerable level of the near-UV spectrum). It seems the extra millirem/day basis of what the raw solar energy that impacted the moon and subsequently provides to our terrestrial satellite X-ray instruments as secondary/recoil energy is of all things directly proportional to the square of the distance from the moon. Of course I'm being conservative by way of stipulating as to the modest 1 mr/day, whereas that amount could easily become 1 mr/hr(24 mr/day) if the solar output conditions are right. This analogy is also entirely discounting whatever benefit afforded by the 'Van Allen buffer zone of death', by which you'd think should contribute yet another good portion of X-ray dosage reduction upon whatever's getting through to our terrestrial satellites, and obviously affording just the opposite as for going towards the moon, whereas this buffer zone of Van Allen belts is entirely within the first half leg of just getting ourselves half the distance towards the moon, might thereby suggest instead of 192,000 km = 4 mr/day could become 16 or even 64 mr/day. As for trying to honestly research, much less asking most any honest questions as to the actual worth of the Van Allen belts for understanding the given task of moderating hard-X-rays, as per filtering what's specifically coming off the solar impacted moon, whereas you'll discover either another load of evidence exclusions, bits of disinformation or at most inconclusive infomercial data that can't be tied into anything NASA/Apollo. It's as though we either do not know squat about the density and subsequent benefits of the Van Allen zone(s) or, that we're being continually snookered for the good of their 'Skull and Bones' MI6/NSA team(s) that seem to have their hidden and ulterior agendas focused at all cost upon sustaining their perpetrated cold-war(s), and that's clearly without any sign whatsoever of remorse, as for becoming such absolute LLPOF folks that they've had to become (or else). As otherwise, why is it so impossible to honestly review hard-science of Van Allen belt facts as such relates to hard-X-rays? The answer is; it simply shouldn't have been all difficult, nor should there have been the need for evidence exclusions and/or cloak and dagger style of need-to-know bodies of nondisclosure, that is unless the truth and nothing but the truth is simply more than we can bare. Such as considering that intelligent design via terraforming a planet is only half as bad as for the likes of our moon and Venus arriving from an older and more powerful kick-ass other star system. Though try suggesting anything about the Sirius star system and of it's extensive Oort zone is only adding to the already darkened sky's that are such because of all the mainstream status quo flak that's coming my way. As for the likes of our missing in action 'tj Frazir', and so many other nice folks are not amused nor the least bit impressed with all of the LLPOF conditional laws of physics, and certainly not intimidated by all of the NASA/Apollo evidence exclusions that are very much like the Iraq WMD fiasco that's been responsible for so much collateral damage plus the taking of tens of thousands of Muslim lives, not to mention a few too many others which we've clearly snookered into getting involved, which only makes the likes of Saddam look much like a certified daycare provider that simply had a few bad days plus a couple of his own incest cloned kids from hell to deal with. Of course we all realize that Saddam wasn't exactly a warm and fuzzy nice sort of dictator, but then neither are most other dictators that are still very much running amuck like our very own resident warlord(GW Bush). If it's acceptable to cloak and dagger about in such a manner as to cause so much collateral damage and the carnage of so many innocent souls, then obviously there's nothing the least bit improper and/or immoral as to limiting what our NASA/Apollo teams of incest cloned borgs have been doing all along, as in such perpetrated wars there are no rules except for the one about your not getting caught or otherwise caught spelling the beans to the facts that there is no actual smoking cold-war gun, just liars telling lies upon lies intended only to beget more lies, having just enough truth mixed in so as to snooker thy humanity into believing that our religion and of whatever political flavor of the day is what's keeping us alive, as opposed to insuring that others opposing our will are going to remain at risk of losing their lives and most certainly the oil beneath. ~ GUTH Venus township, Bridge & ET Park-n-Ride tarmac: http://guthvenus.tripod.com/gv-town.htm Brad Guth LSE-CM/ISS (Lunar Space Elevator) http://guthvenus.tripod.com/lunar-space-elevator.htm Other somewhat testy topics; Brad Guth / GASA-IEIS http://guthvenus.tripod.com/gv-topics.htm |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Is the Moon Hollow? Sleuths? | Imperishable Stars | Misc | 46 | October 8th 04 04:08 PM |
Apollo | Buzz alDredge | Astronomy Misc | 5 | July 28th 04 10:05 AM |
The apollo faq | the inquirer | Astronomy Misc | 11 | April 22nd 04 06:23 AM |
significant addition to section 25 of the faq | heat | Astronomy Misc | 1 | April 15th 04 01:20 AM |
The Apollo FAQ (moon landings were faked) | Nathan Jones | Misc | 8 | February 4th 04 07:48 PM |