#91
|
|||
|
|||
"Greg D. Moore \(Strider\)" writes:
Of course Wormhole X-treme points out the truth... Stargate is really a program, the TV show is just for plassible deniability. Well, just remember, Stargate SG1 maps to reality about as accurately as Wormhole X-treme maps to Stargate SG1. pgf |
#92
|
|||
|
|||
"Phil Fraering" wrote in message ... "Greg D. Moore \(Strider\)" writes: Of course Wormhole X-treme points out the truth... Stargate is really a program, the TV show is just for plassible deniability. Well, just remember, Stargate SG1 maps to reality about as accurately as Wormhole X-treme maps to Stargate SG1. Exactly! Remember, you've got Christian Bocher who plays the actor Raymond Gunne who portrays the character Dr. Levant who is based on the character Dr. Jackson who is played Michael Shanks, which is based on the character potrayed by James Spader in the movie which in turn is based on the Real Dr. McCoy of the real Stargate program. Or something like that. pgf |
#93
|
|||
|
|||
He's being paid by Lockheed to be a
diversion and to make NASA/Lockheed secret discoveries on Mars look ridiculous. He's doing an excellent job, then. |
#94
|
|||
|
|||
On Wed, 17 Mar 2004 22:44:14 GMT, Wally Anglesea™
wrote: And this is what NASA/Lockheed are hiding: 1. Hoagland a fraud. He's being paid by Lockheed to be a diversion and to make NASA/Lockheed secret discoveries on Mars look ridiculous. 2) Ruins of a previous sophisticated and technologically advanced civilization on Mars. This extinct Martian civilization shows evidence of being more technologically advanced than current earth. 3) Evidence of a sudden, catastrophic mass extinction of that civilization on Mars. 4). A breathable atmosphere on Mars. 5). Vegetation on Mars. 6). Grey aliens currently have established a base on Mars. And your evidence for this is? Malin has the evidence, I'm just the messenger. IN other wordfs, you are making it up as you go along, like you did about the sekrit flying saucer underground at Groom Lake. Of course not. I always tell the truth. Not according to the evidence available on Usenet, kook. Are you accusing NASA of lying? Or are you still attempting to shoot the messenger? Yep, You took a strong stupid pill today, didn't you, kook? Strong yes, stupid no. Not with a 200 IQ. Your waste size in inches is NOT your IQ, kook. My waist is 34". |
#95
|
|||
|
|||
On Wed, 17 Mar 2004 07:09:45 -0600, Herb Schaltegger
wrote: In article , $ wrote: On Wed, 17 Mar 2004 01:26:56 GMT, Bruce Palmer wrote: Herb Schaltegger wrote: In article , * wrote: Abuse complaint filed. AOL Me too. /AOL You don't have to do that. Lockheed will just use Echelon to censor me. HAHAHAHA. Cowards! It algol lets me know the power of the pen is much mightier that the sword. And further verifies Lockheed paranoia. I love it. I've already filed a second abuse report. Should I file a third? That won't erase the fact that Hoagland is a fraud. And, btw, your posts are coming through loud and clear, your fears of censorship to the contrary. Um, you're making a very false assumption. However, they are entirely off-topic and off-charter for the sci.space newsgroups and THAT'S why people are objecting. Confine your lunacy to the alt.* groups and no one will care. I didn't start the crosposting. So take it up with the person who did. I take it you guys don't talk about space related matters in the space groups. Spacey, dude. Spacey. And it figures. |
#97
|
|||
|
|||
On Wed, 17 Mar 2004 13:39:23 GMT, "Greg D. Moore \(Strider\)"
wrote: "Herb Schaltegger" wrote in message news:herbschaltegger- I've already filed a second abuse report. Should I file a third? And, btw, your posts are coming through loud and clear, your fears of censorship to the contrary. However, they are entirely off-topic and off-charter for the sci.space newsgroups and THAT'S why people are objecting. Confine your lunacy to the alt.* groups and no one will care. Well, that's not ENTIRELY true Herb. If he actually posted verifable evidence, he'd be welcomed with open arms. I did. And it can be verified by Malin's raw Mars MOC photographic data. I mean I think I speak for most sci.space folks that if there were REAL evidence of life on Mars we'd love to hear it. You did, and you're denying it. But as long as he spouts nonsense, I agree. He can stay with the alt.* groups. So you're calling NASA liars. Figures. 'Cause that's where the information came from. -- Herb Schaltegger, B.S., J.D. Reformed Aerospace Engineer Columbia Loss FAQ: http://www.io.com/~o_m/columbia_loss_faq_x.html |
#98
|
|||
|
|||
On 17 Mar 2004 09:32:27 -0500, jeff findley
wrote: * writes: On 16 Mar 2004 18:07:07 -0800, (George William Herbert) wrote: The data format has been published. Looking it up would require some actual research in a library looking at journals, however, which may be beyond your limited capabilities. You'd probably have to write some software to do it, though there's an outside chance that Malin would give it to you. You keep making this out to be harder than it is. Translation: no one has the programs to retrieve the raw Mars photographs but Malin. And you clearly lack the skills to write a simple program to transform data from one format to another. This is one of the *easiest* types of programs to write. I've written dozens of such programs over the last 15 years or so. About half for "fun" and about half for work. You don't even need a "modern" programming language to write this sort of code. C would be my choice, but just about any other language that has reasonably complete libraries for file I/O would suffice. You don't even need a UI for such programs. Just run it from the command line since the only input is the file to process. I'm not saying that you personally need to write the code, but anyone with a B.S. in Computer Science (or the equivalent experience) would be able to write such a program in short order (not just Malin). No they can't. They're coded. Jeff |
#99
|
|||
|
|||
On Wed, 17 Mar 2004 09:57:59 -0500, "Ami Silberman"
wrote: "*" wrote in message Okay smart ass, why are the MOC photos coded during transmission from Mars Because to digitally store or transmit images they need to be encoded in some sort of format. To transmit them, furthermore, there needs to be further encoding to be able to detect and correct errors during transmission. Conceptually, its no different than fax transmission in the 60s. But the truth is, no one can receive the raw Mars MOC photographs without having the decoding programs that Malin has. Tell me one thing, if the raw Mars MOC photographic data is available, why don't any other independent scientists outside of NASA/Lockheed have it? Please name one scientist not employed by or under contract to NASA who has access to the decoding programs and the raw Mars MOC photographic data. You can't because there are none. |
#100
|
|||
|
|||
On Wed, 17 Mar 2004 09:22:14 -0600, Herb Schaltegger
wrote: In article , "Greg D. Moore \(Strider\)" wrote: "Herb Schaltegger" wrote in message news:herbschaltegger- I've already filed a second abuse report. Should I file a third? And, btw, your posts are coming through loud and clear, your fears of censorship to the contrary. However, they are entirely off-topic and off-charter for the sci.space newsgroups and THAT'S why people are objecting. Confine your lunacy to the alt.* groups and no one will care. Well, that's not ENTIRELY true Herb. If he actually posted verifable evidence, he'd be welcomed with open arms. I mean I think I speak for most sci.space folks that if there were REAL evidence of life on Mars we'd love to hear it. But as long as he spouts nonsense, I agree. He can stay with the alt.* groups. Yeah, you're right. As it stands, however, he's spouting Guth-like nonsense combined with Maxson-like anti-NASA/anti-Lockheed paranoia and hostility. Are you calling NASA liars and paranoid? "Cause NASA is the source of the information I posted. snip |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Hoagland a fraud? | * | Policy | 129 | March 30th 04 06:20 AM |
Electric Gravity&Instantaneous Light | ralph sansbury | Astronomy Misc | 8 | August 31st 03 02:53 AM |