|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
rk wrote:
Kevin Willoughby wrote: Does any of that explain why the S-V guidance computer worked just fine when the Apollo computer had been knocked sideways by lighting on Apollo 12? I don't know, have no data, but I always thought about just that issue. The explanation I heard was that the Apollo computer being in a smaller volume and nearer the strike was exposed to higher EMF effects than the S-V computer. D. -- Touch-twice life. Eat. Drink. Laugh. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
The Apollo Hoax FAQ (is not spam) :-) | Nathan Jones | Astronomy Misc | 5 | July 29th 04 06:14 AM |
The Apollo Hoax FAQ (is not spam) :-) | Nathan Jones | Misc | 6 | July 29th 04 06:14 AM |
Apollo | Buzz alDredge | Misc | 5 | July 28th 04 10:05 AM |
The Apollo Hoax FAQ | darla | Misc | 10 | July 25th 04 02:57 PM |
The Apollo Hoax FAQ | darla | UK Astronomy | 11 | July 25th 04 02:57 PM |