|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Dayton Miller's Data have no Real Signal
In the 1920's and 30's Dayton Miller made an enormous number of
measurements using several versions of his Michelson interferometer. In 1933 he published a review article, "The Ether-Drift Experiment and the Determination of the Absolute Motion of the Earth" [1]. If valid, the results of that paper would refute SR and GR. Since its publication, no convincing refutation of that paper has been given, though Shankland et al tried to do so [2]. Since then numerous people have proclaimed Miller's data are correct, and have built castles in the air based on that assumption. This article explains why Miller, and modern advocates of his anomalous result, are wrong: there is no real signal in his data at all; his data and results are completely explained by a large systematic error that masquerades as a "signal". The full article is posted to the newsgroup sci.physics.relativity, and all discussion will take place there. Tom Roberts |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Dayton Miller's Data have no Real Signal
In article , Tom Roberts
wrote: In the 1920's and 30's Dayton Miller made an enormous number of measurements using several versions of his Michelson interferometer. In 1933 he published a review article, "The Ether-Drift Experiment and the Determination of the Absolute Motion of the Earth" [1]. If valid, the results of that paper would refute SR and GR. Since its publication, no convincing refutation of that paper has been given, though Shankland et al tried to do so [2] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dayton_Miller appears to give a concise description of this matter, which to be honest, I'd never heard of before. There's a meta-issue in this - the parody of science portrayed by many religious fundamentalists and internet kooks has it that scientific orthodoxy is handed down from professor to student, graven into slabs of Unobtanium, and woe betide the heretic who dares question the Law! (I typed that doing my worst Judge Dredd impersonation G) So perhaps there's grounds to encourage wider knowledge of this sort of disagreement. [Posted for the information of s.a.r readers, not followed up to s.p.r since I'm quite sure that there will be flame wars licking the ceiling there before long.] -- Aidan Karley, Aberdeen, Scotland, Location: +57d10' , -02d09' (sub-tropical Aberdeen), 0.021233 Written at Fri, 09 Dec 2005 13:21 GMT |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
STS51L Accident Questions | Mark Percival | History | 594 | April 3rd 05 01:54 AM |
Sedna, space probes?, colonies? what's next? | TKalbfus | Policy | 265 | July 13th 04 12:00 AM |
FAQ-2-B: sci.space.tech reading list (special post to ssh) | dave schneider | History | 0 | May 19th 04 01:22 AM |
Space Shuttle | ypauls | Misc | 3 | March 15th 04 01:12 AM |
Question For Craig Markwardt re Pioneer 10 Data | ralph sansbury | Astronomy Misc | 32 | November 30th 03 09:47 PM |