Age of solar system needs a fresh look

Age of solar system needs a fresh look
http://www.sciencenews.org/view/gene...s_a_fresh_look
Honed measurements show age overshot by amount significant to earliest
stage of formation.

Sam Wormley wrote:

Age of solar system needs a fresh look
http://www.sciencenews.org/view/gene...s_a_fresh_look
Honed measurements show age overshot by amount significant to earliest
stage of formation.

"Historical estimates place the age at about 4.5 billion years"
"recent calculations place the age at more like 4.5672 billion years"
"this difference is important in understanding the infant solar
system"

A 1.5% relative increase overturning our "understanding" of anything
composed of conjecture is bull****.

--
Uncle Al
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/
(Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals)
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/qz4.htm

On Dec 31 2009, 10:37*pm, Sam Wormley wrote:
Age of solar system needs a fresh lookhttp://www.sciencenews.org/view/generic/id/52306/title/Age_of_solar_s...
Honed measurements show age overshot by amount significant to earliest
stage of formation.

Too bad my paramagnetic basalt moon rocks don't agree with NASA's moon
rocks.

Wonder why our moon(Selene) is so much more radioactive than Earth.
Of course anything derived from the Sirius(B) nova would be newer and
thus more radioactive.

~ BG