A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Others » UK Astronomy
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Time constant calculation for proton and electron



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old May 6th 06, 01:05 AM posted to uk.sci.astronomy
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Time constant calculation for proton and electron

Time constant calculation for Proton and Electron

Let us calculate the time constant for the proton and electron:
From Doppler Space Time by Gerald Grushow © 2000, the force between two hydrogen atoms is:
F - @ Uo (QC/137.036) x (4 piQ Vb*) where Uo is the electrical permeability, Q
is charge of electron, C is speed of light pi = 3.14159, and Vb* is the expansion
velocity of the Bohr orbit over time. This gives Vb = 1.053572E-28
Since the Bohr Radius is 5.29177E-11, the time of the Universe since our big bang at
the center of our galaxy is 15.9145 billion years.
The time line at our big bang is
8G QQ = K Mp Mp because the mass of the proton and the mass of the electron
are identical at big bang.
Therefore
Q/Mp = (K/8G)^0.5
Q/Mp = 2.318E18
2.318E18 E ^-t/T = 9.5789E7
t/T = natural log (2.420E10) = 23.91
Since t = 15.9145 billion years the decay time constant is:
T = 15.9145E9/ 23.895 = 666.017 million years
Therefore T = 666 million years.
Proton time constant = 971.,58E6
Electron time constant = 666E6
Pi Messon time constatn = 869.81E6
The electrical constant rises at 666E6 time constant while the gravitational time
constant calculates to be 204.667 million years. At big bang the force of
gravitational attraction between two protons equals the electrical repulsive force.




----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----
  #2  
Old May 6th 06, 01:03 PM posted to uk.sci.astronomy
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Time constant calculation for proton and electron


Jerry wrote:
Very interesting but what does this mean

Time constant calculation for Proton and Electron

Let us calculate the time constant for the proton and electron:
From Doppler Space Time by Gerald Grushow © 2000, the force between twohydrogen atoms is:
F - @ Uo (QC/137.036) x (4 piQ Vb*) where Uo is the electrical permeability, Q
is charge of electron, C is speed of light pi = 3.14159, and Vb* is theexpansion
velocity of the Bohr orbit over time. This gives Vb = 1.053572E-28
Since the Bohr Radius is 5.29177E-11, the time of the Universe since our big bang at
the center of our galaxy is 15.9145 billion years.
The time line at our big bang is
8G QQ = K Mp Mp because the mass of the proton and the mass of the electron
are identical at big bang.
Therefore
Q/Mp = (K/8G)^0.5
Q/Mp = 2.318E18
2.318E18 E ^-t/T = 9.5789E7
t/T = natural log (2.420E10) = 23.91
Since t = 15.9145 billion years the decay time constant is:
T = 15.9145E9/ 23.895 = 666.017 million years
Therefore T = 666 million years.
Proton time constant = 971.,58E6
Electron time constant = 666E6
Pi Messon time constatn = 869.81E6
The electrical constant rises at 666E6 time constant while the gravitational time
constant calculates to be 204.667 million years. At big bang the force of
gravitational attraction between two protons equals the electrical repulsive force.




----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----


  #3  
Old May 6th 06, 05:18 PM posted to uk.sci.astronomy
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Time constant calculation for proton and electron


wrote:
Jerry wrote:
Very interesting but what does this mean



The descent of the sci.forums is nothing short of spectacular,as though
the entire edifice collapsed without trace leaving only the skeleton of
conceptual tinsel.

Who knows how the thing will return but a good start is to get a feel
for the original transition from geocentric to heliocentric
astronomy,not as empiricists have it but through the original texts
allied with modern time lapse footage and technology.

http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/ima...2000_tezel.gif

The avenues provided by the working principles of a moving Earth rather
than undisciplined choice of 'reference frames' are exciting for those
who actually are giving themselves more choices by permitting the
celestial cycles dictate the conceptual directions.The bogus
framehopping of Newton in his resolution of observed retrogrades has
played itself out over 3 centuries and it is time for astronomers to
recover the dignity and depth of their heritage from fraud and
undisciplined misconduct.

I have played my part in providing the visible comparisons between the
original texts and their fraudulent misuse by Newton but in truth,the
effort is always towards the productive avenues open through the
original astronomical blueprints of Copernicus,Kepler and Roemer.

It may be unfair to dwell on the 10th argument of Kepler but swirling
around that reasoning is the Newton mutation of Copernican
heliocentricity.There is some dignity left in those who choose not to
make matters worse by attacking this author as the fraud becomes
visible,it is after all,Kepler's work that was used as a wedge to
destroy Copernican heliocentricity and perhaps there is one thing we
all can share from our respective sides - temporary disappointment.

______________________________________________

Epitome Of Copernican Astronomy by JOHANNES KEPLER

Finally by what arguments do you prove that the centre of the Sun which
is at the midpoint of the planetary spheres and bears their whole
system - does not revolve in some annual movement,as Brahe wishes,but
in accordance with Copernicus sticks immobile in one place,while the
centre of the Earth revolves in an annual movement.



Argument 10

" The 10th argument,taken from the periodic times, is as follows; the
apparent movement of the Sun has 365 days which is the mean measure
between Venus' period of 225 days and Mars' period of 687
days.Therefore does not the nature of things shout out loud that the
circuits in which those 365 days are taken up has a mean position
between the circuits of Mars and Venus around the Sun and thus this is
not the circuit of the Sun around the Earth -for none of the primary
planets has its orbit arranged around the Earth,as Brahe admits,but the
circuit of the Earth around the resting Sun,just as the other
planets,namely Mars and Venus,complete their own periods by running
around the Sun."

Johannes Kepler

_______________________________________________

PHENOMENON IV.
"That the fixed stars being at rest, the periodic times of the five
primary planets, and (whether of the sun about the earth, or) of the
earth about the sun, are in the sesquiplicate proportion of their mean
distances from the sun.

This proportion, first observed by Kepler, is now received by all
astronomers; for the periodic times are the same, and the dimensions of
the orbits are the same, whether the sun revolves about the earth, or
the earth about the sun. And as to the measures of the periodic times,
all astronomers are agreed about them. But for the dimensions of the
orbits, Kepler and Bullialdus, above all others, have determined them
from observations with the greatest accuracy; and the mean distances
corresponding to the periodic times differ but insensibly from those
which they have assigned, and for the most part fall in between them;
as we may see from the following table." newton



* http://members.tripod.com/~gravitee/phaenomena.htm

  #4  
Old May 7th 06, 08:38 PM posted to uk.sci.astronomy
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Time constant calculation for proton and electron

"Jerry" wrote:

----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----

From:
Date: 6 May 2006 05:03:47 -0700


Jerry wrote:
Very interesting but what does this mean

I will post more later of my latest work. In short, the world is composed of a multiplicity
of two things which I call dot-waves. these circle the universe from our stars to the center
of our galaxy. Energy from our galaxies return to the black hole at the center of our
galaxy. When the voltage level reaches a maximum, the black holes explodes and
anti-protons and antielectrons are emitted. This produces a lake of fire at the speed of
light which destroys our galaxy. A New Earth will form. The time constant of the proton
and electron show the decay cycle. At local big bang the energy is huge. The anti-proton
and and antielectron will take the antimatter configuration. The antiprotons will spin
around the antielectron and decay faster on the next cycle.
The same thing will appear for all the other galaxies. The big bangs are time delayed
from each other. In this manner the universe oscillated perpetually.
If you would like a free copy of the first three chapters of Gravity's revelation, just email
me at
.


----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----
  #5  
Old May 8th 06, 06:27 AM posted to uk.sci.astronomy
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Time constant calculation for proton and electron

In article , starway-
says...

I will post more later of my latest work.


Nah, don't bother.
--
Craig Oldfield
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
[sci.astro] Astrophysics (Astronomy Frequently Asked Questions) (4/9) [email protected] Astronomy Misc 0 May 3rd 06 12:34 PM
The Gravitational Instability Cosmological Theory Br Dan Izzo Astronomy Misc 0 August 31st 04 02:35 AM
Beyond Linear Cosmology and Hypnotic Theology Yoda Misc 0 June 30th 04 07:33 PM
New Quasar Studies Keep Fundamental Physical Constant Constant (Forwarded) Andrew Yee Astronomy Misc 0 April 28th 04 07:46 PM
Mind-2, Time waves and Theory of Everything Yoda Misc 0 April 20th 04 06:11 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:05 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.