|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Time to move space discussions to alt.politics?
I admit I haven't checked how much traffic there is on alt.politics, but
I'm guessing it has to be MUCH less than the off-topic political discussions on the sci.space.* groups. May as well mess with everyone's minds and ignore the entire naming scheme of Usenet. *sigh* |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Time to move space discussions to alt.politics?
"Jim Logajan" wrote in message
... I admit I haven't checked how much traffic there is on alt.politics, but I'm guessing it has to be MUCH less than the off-topic political discussions on the sci.space.* groups. May as well mess with everyone's minds and ignore the entire naming scheme of Usenet. *sigh* And what, may I ask, have you posted to this group that is ON TOPIC?? -- Alan Erskine We can get people to the Moon in five years, not the fifteen GWB proposes. Give NASA a real challenge |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Time to move space discussions to alt.politics?
"Alan Erskine" wrote:
"Jim Logajan" wrote in message I admit I haven't checked how much traffic there is on alt.politics, but I'm guessing it has to be MUCH less than the off-topic political discussions on the sci.space.* groups. May as well mess with everyone's minds and ignore the entire naming scheme of Usenet. *sigh* And what, may I ask, have you posted to this group that is ON TOPIC?? This has always been a pretty lame excuse for posting continual off topic drivel. Many, many people who could post on topic are driven away from a group that's *continually* off-topic. This is a fact. People not speaking up and saying that this isn't good enough is one of the reasons why Usenet is FUBAR'ed. Byeeeee. -- Gadzooks - here comes the Harbourmaster! http://www.geocities.com/brettocallaghan - Newsgroup Stats for Agent http://members.iinet.net.au/~brettocallaghan/ - Home of WhoINFO "Yads: killfiled permanently since January 1, 2004" |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Time to move space discussions to alt.politics?
"Brett O'Callaghan" wrote in message
... This has always been a pretty lame excuse for posting continual off topic drivel. Many, many people who could post on topic are driven away from a group that's *continually* off-topic. Then people killfile the thread or the individual. There was/is a thread about "Military service and the astronaut corps". It got to be LaTroll vs just about everyone. I don't see that thread anymore. I also don't see anything LaTroll posts for the same reason. Killfile is your friend. -- Alan Erskine We can get people to the Moon in five years, not the fifteen GWB proposes. Give NASA a real challenge |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Time to move space discussions to alt.politics?
Jim Logajan wrote in message 6...
I admit I haven't checked how much traffic there is on alt.politics, but I'm guessing it has to be MUCH less than the off-topic political discussions on the sci.space.* groups. May as well mess with everyone's minds and ignore the entire naming scheme of Usenet. *sigh* Perhaps not. Sci.space.policy seems to have a low crank level (only about 25%?) . Alt.politics probably has a far higher crank level, making sensible discussion almost impossible. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Time to move space discussions to alt.politics? | Jim Logajan | Space Shuttle | 4 | July 7th 04 01:20 PM |
Clueless pundits (was High-flight rate Medium vs. New Heavy lift launchers) | Rand Simberg | Space Science Misc | 18 | February 14th 04 03:28 AM |
Space Access Update #102 2/9/04 | Henry Vanderbilt | Policy | 1 | February 10th 04 03:18 PM |
NASA to Start From Scratch in New [Moon/Mars Exploration] Effort | Tom Abbott | Policy | 14 | January 19th 04 12:12 AM |
International Space Station Science - One of NASA's rising stars | Jacques van Oene | Space Station | 0 | December 27th 03 01:32 PM |