Dark Matter question

Bert wrote,
To sum it up I believe a singularity has a
critical density,and will explode.

Bert, you also should include spin rate in determining `critical
density` at which the thing would let go, like a burst flywheel. It's
analogous to the spin of a neutron star which is believed to have a
burst limit, which is why we don't see millisecond pulsars above a
certain speed. oc

"It is described abstractly in mathematical language, _but not
explained_."

Hi oc Right you are. Leaving out the motion of spin is not good
thinking. My problem is I always leave out some important things. I get
email I should make my thoughts clearer (they are right about that) My
thinking is very manic,and nobody knows that better than me. How
can I ever leave out spin when I have a theory that I call "Spin Is In"
Bert

Bert wrote,
How can I ever leave out spin when I
have a theory that I call "Spin Is In".

Yeah Bert, in the analogy with millisecond pulsars, a 'burst point'
should lie somewhere above 700 revolutions per second. But instead of
exploding, the neutron star is believed to go into an oscillatory mode
sorta like a ball of Jello, and radiates the excess energy off as
gravitational waves. Thus a 'speed limit' is imposed on these objects.
See- http://www.astronomy.com/Content/Dyn...1/403ezvie.asp
So 'What if' your spinning singularity exhibits a similar
behavior? And 'What if' a hypermassive, spinning Singularity resides at
the core of the universe, outside our horizon of visibility,
"broadcasting" the sub-Planck standing-wave field of space itself (and
its tagalong 'dustbunny')? oc

"It is described abstractly in mathematical language, _but not
explained_."