|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
........Nasa/Griffin LYING about Public Support for Moon/Mars Mission!
crude oil manipulation of price some hypotheses new falls and crack
SELLING CRUDE OIL at COST PRICE, Manipulation of the price? Some hypotheses Manipulation of the price? Some hypotheses. While the barrel seems is stopped around 59,5 $, it is continued to whisper, between the other motivations, than the reduction of the price it is due to manipulations of the USA government in sight of the elections of November. Reasonable hypothesis, says Jeff Vail , an intelligence analyst American with blog a a lot interesting on energetic arguments. But little supported from facts: we try instead elaborating some theories on as such manipulation can be put in practical. Here then the five hypotheses of Jeff: Political 1-Pressione on a Government agency in order to stop order regulations momentarily acclimatizes them that they block meaningful amounts of oil. As an example, to concur with the BP of procrastinare the riparazione/rimpiazzo of the famous pipeline of Prudhoe Bay... and is just what it is happening : the BP will use "varying" for more bypassare the points corroded of the oil pipe-line guaranteeing others 400,000 barrels within October. 2- political Pressure on a Government agency in order to accelerate the putting in commerce of diesel engine to low sulfur content. This movement forces the refineries to momentarily block to the diesel engine production, diverting the oil in the benzine production... and is just what it is happening : from the 1 July the diesel oil production is obligatory to low sulfur content. 3- political Pressure on a Government agency in order to change disowned noticille that they regulate the trading of the oil. As an example, reducing the contract number that the great investor can stop, forcing them to market the surplus to being made to come down the price... and it is just what it is happening : in federal base to one demanded this limit it has been recently reduced. 4- political Pressure on a producing foreign Country in order to implement the added one of etanolo to the benzine, being forced therefore the home market of that Country to slow down the oil use is in order to adapt itself to the new technology that for the higher price, and putting therefore greater oil on the market... and is just what it is happening , just to the Nigeria. 5- Aumentare the production from the Iraq. But siccome it is an operation difficult in presence of attacks of the guerrilla, enough to concur with "pirati" of the oil, many assets in Iraq, to export the product in the Countries limitrofi remaining without to pay ... and is just what it is happening : Navy American has been as soon as replaced most insufficient Navy irachena in the control of the Gulf and the activities of clandestine export of the oil, concurring an increase very 200,000 barrels from the Iraq. And you, have other hypotheses on as the manipulation of the price happens? THANKS OPEC for the new CRACK "jonathan" ha scritto nel messaggio . .. Gallup Organization issues unusual 'video rebuttal' to Griffin's claim of public support for Moon/Mars missions. .... link below How many times have we heard Nasa and Griffin claim that some 3/4ths of the public support going back to the Moon and Mars? They poll they quote was commissioned by the Coalition for Space Exploration, which is a lobbyist front for the following corporations. http://www.spacecoalition.com/home.html Member companies ATK Thiokol The Boeing Company Lockheed Martin Northrop Grumman United Space Alliance Space Foundation Aerojet Analytical Graphics, Inc. Ball Aerospace & Technologies Corp. California Space Authority Delaware North Parks Services Florida Space Authority Hamilton Sundstrand Honeywell National Space Society Moog Pratt & Whitney Raytheon The USA Today/CNN/Gallup poll question they used follows. In January 2004, a new plan or goal for space exploration was announced. The plan includes a stepping-stone approach to return the space shuttle to flight, complete assembly of the space station, build a replacement for the shuttle, go back to the Moon, and then on to Mars and beyond. If NASA's new budget did not exceed one percent of the federal budget, to what extent would you support or oppose this new plan for space exploration? http://www.spacepolitics.com/archives/000597.html To disagree with this statement, one would have to oppose ever flying the shuttle again, oppose completing the ISS oppose a shuttle replacement, support an 'all at once' approach and support higher Nasa budgets. It's difficult to imagine a more biased or loaded poll question. Yet Griffin cites this poll to Congress. "Recent and very specific public opinion surveys do in fact show a broad consensus in support of our new goals in space. Assuming that funding levels for NASA do not exceed one percent of the budget - and we should be so fortunate - fully three-fourths of the American people support the goals of the Vision. http://www.nasawatch.com/archives/20...ffins_s_1.html "Have you stopped beating your wife ...questions" ....Mike Griffin In an rare rebuttal of Griffin's use of this biased poll, Gallup issued this video reponse showing the true level of public support for the Vision. http://www.galluppoll.com/videoArchive/?ci=17596&pg= I would have to agree with Griffin's statement in the video that 'you can get almost any answer you like' with polls in how they are worded. But it should be clear that it's Nasa and Griffin that are playing the word game, and loose with the truth. To go from 75% support to 40% can't be called a generous spin, it has to called what it is. A bald faced lie. Nasa still, a year later, quotes the original poll written by the consortium that is pushing the Vision on the American taxpayers. If we can't trust Nasa to tell us the truth, they shouldn't be trusted with our future, let alone our tax dollars. Jonathan s |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
........Nasa/Griffin LYING about Public Support for Moon/Mars Mission!
"Mr. Energy" wrote in message .. . crude oil manipulation of price some hypotheses new falls and crack Complete, coherent sentences would serve you better in broadcasting your message. The USE of ALL CAPS is the SURE SIGN of a KOOK. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
........Nasa/Griffin LYING about Public Support for Moon/Mars Mission!
On Wed, 27 Sep 2006 14:59:00 -0400, in a place far, far away, "Scott
Hedrick" made the phosphor on my monitor glow in such a way as to indicate that: "Mr. Energy" wrote in message . .. crude oil manipulation of price some hypotheses new falls and crack Complete, coherent sentences would serve you better in broadcasting your message. The USE of ALL CAPS is the SURE SIGN of a KOOK. Reinforced by the screen name "Mr. Energy." |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
........Nasa/Griffin LYING about Public Support for Moon/Mars Mission!
Gallup Organization issues unusual 'video rebuttal' to Griffin's claim of public support for Moon/Mars missions. .... link below How many times have we heard Nasa and Griffin claim that some 3/4ths of the public support going back to the Moon and Mars? They poll they quote was commissioned by the Coalition for Space Exploration, which is a lobbyist front for the following corporations. http://www.spacecoalition.com/home.html Member companies ATK Thiokol The Boeing Company Lockheed Martin Northrop Grumman United Space Alliance Space Foundation Aerojet Analytical Graphics, Inc. Ball Aerospace & Technologies Corp. California Space Authority Delaware North Parks Services Florida Space Authority Hamilton Sundstrand Honeywell National Space Society Moog Pratt & Whitney Raytheon The USA Today/CNN/Gallup poll question they used follows. In January 2004, a new plan or goal for space exploration was announced. The plan includes a stepping-stone approach to return the space shuttle to flight, complete assembly of the space station, build a replacement for the shuttle, go back to the Moon, and then on to Mars and beyond. If NASA's new budget did not exceed one percent of the federal budget, to what extent would you support or oppose this new plan for space exploration? http://www.spacepolitics.com/archives/000597.html To disagree with this statement, one would have to oppose ever flying the shuttle again, oppose completing the ISS oppose a shuttle replacement, support an 'all at once' approach and support higher Nasa budgets. It's difficult to imagine a more biased or loaded poll question. Yet Griffin cites this poll to Congress. "Recent and very specific public opinion surveys do in fact show a broad consensus in support of our new goals in space. Assuming that funding levels for NASA do not exceed one percent of the budget - and we should be so fortunate - fully three-fourths of the American people support the goals of the Vision. http://www.nasawatch.com/archives/20...ffins_s_1.html "Have you stopped beating your wife ...questions" ....Mike Griffin In an rare rebuttal of Griffin's use of this biased poll, Gallup issued this video reponse showing the true level of public support for the Vision. http://www.galluppoll.com/videoArchive/?ci=17596&pg= I would have to agree with Griffin's statement in the video that 'you can get almost any answer you like' with polls in how they are worded. But it should be clear that it's Nasa and Griffin that are playing the word game, and loose with the truth. To go from 75% support to 40% can't be called a generous spin, it has to called what it is. A bald faced lie. Nasa still, a year later, quotes the original poll written by the consortium that is pushing the Vision on the American taxpayers. If we can't trust Nasa to tell us the truth, they shouldn't be trusted with our future, let alone our tax dollars. Jonathan s |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
...Nasa/Griffin LYING about Public Support for Moon/Mars Vision! | jonathan | Policy | 0 | September 25th 06 03:28 AM |
DoD supports Atlantis shuttle mission (Forwarded) | Andrew Yee | Space Shuttle | 0 | September 8th 06 02:45 PM |
Why is NASA lying to the public? | Mad Scientist | Misc | 45 | July 25th 04 08:19 PM |
Booster Crossing | Chuck Stewart | Space Shuttle | 124 | September 15th 03 12:43 AM |