Solar System guide

For those unfamiliar with this document it is something I post to two
newsgroups twice a year. The main change since December is a regrouping of
the Kuiper Belt and beyond to reflect current thinking about remote Neptune
resonances. Details of subdivisions of Earth have also changed to reflect
European expansion. Note that Sedna is not as yet an official name, but the
body for which that name is proposed is mentioned under "possible worlds
beyond".

"Charles Gilman" wrote in message
...
For those unfamiliar with this document it is something I post to two
newsgroups twice a year. The main change since December is a regrouping of
the Kuiper Belt and beyond to reflect current thinking about remote
Neptune
resonances. Details of subdivisions of Earth have also changed to reflect
European expansion. Note that Sedna is not as yet an official name, but
the
body for which that name is proposed is mentioned under "possible worlds
beyond".




So where is it........?

"Charles Gilman" wrote in message
...
For those unfamiliar with this document it is something I post to two
newsgroups twice a year. The main change since December is a regrouping of
the Kuiper Belt and beyond to reflect current thinking about remote
Neptune
resonances. Details of subdivisions of Earth have also changed to reflect
European expansion. Note that Sedna is not as yet an official name, but
the
body for which that name is proposed is mentioned under "possible worlds
beyond".




So where is it........?

He attached the file. It all depends what program your using to use NG's,
with some of them you can't view attachments.

LJ

He attached the file. It all depends what program your using to use NG's,
with some of them you can't view attachments.

LJ

"Lloyd Jones" wrote in message
...
He attached the file. It all depends what program your using to use NG's,
with some of them you can't view attachments.

LJ




MS Outlook. I can't see any attachment...?

"Lloyd Jones" wrote in message
...
He attached the file. It all depends what program your using to use NG's,
with some of them you can't view attachments.

LJ




MS Outlook. I can't see any attachment...?

No, its worse than that.

Many servers don't replicate attachments unless the newsgroup name contains
the word "binaries". Its got nothing to do with your newsreader; I don't
know of newsreaders that cannot handle attachments in some way.

"Lloyd Jones" wrote in message
...
He attached the file. It all depends what program your using to use NG's,
with some of them you can't view attachments.

LJ

No, its worse than that.

Many servers don't replicate attachments unless the newsgroup name contains
the word "binaries". Its got nothing to do with your newsreader; I don't
know of newsreaders that cannot handle attachments in some way.

"Lloyd Jones" wrote in message
...
He attached the file. It all depends what program your using to use NG's,
with some of them you can't view attachments.

LJ

On Sun, 20 Jun 2004 22:30:29 +1000, in uk.sci.astronomy , "Peter Webb"
wrote:

No, its worse than that.

or, more accurately, better.

Many servers don't replicate attachments unless the newsgroup name contains
the word "binaries".

This is IMHO a good thing.
--
Mark McIntyre
CLC FAQ http://www.eskimo.com/~scs/C-faq/top.html
CLC readme: http://www.angelfire.com/ms3/bchambless0/welcome_to_clc.html


----== Posted via Newsfeed.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeed.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 100,000 Newsgroups
---= 19 East/West-Coast Specialized Servers - Total Privacy via Encryption =---


----== Posted via Newsfeed.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeed.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 100,000 Newsgroups
---= 19 East/West-Coast Specialized Servers - Total Privacy via Encryption =---