|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
ASTRO: Mars 11-09-07 in very good seeing
So far one of my better results of this apparition.
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
ASTRO: Mars 11-09-07 in very good seeing
"J.Warren" schreef in bericht
m... So far one of my better results of this apparition. indeed, excellent detail! -- Martijn www.xs4all.nl/~martlian |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
ASTRO: Mars 11-09-07 in very good seeing
A lot of details !!! Very beautifull image!!!
-- -- Fabio Acquarone Website: http://www.fabioh2o.it Email : "J.Warren" ha scritto nel messaggio m... So far one of my better results of this apparition. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
ASTRO: Mars 11-09-07 in very good seeing
Thanks guys. That image was captured at 30fps. I shot about 15gig worth of
avis and I believe 7.5fps gave me the best result. Its a bit sharper. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
ASTRO: Mars 11-09-07 in very good seeing
In article , J.Warren
wrote: Thanks guys. That image was captured at 30fps. I shot about 15gig worth of avis and I believe 7.5fps gave me the best result. Its a bit sharper. begin 666 Hi Joel; Very nice images. Probably the reason you got sharper images at 7.5 fps versus 30 is because you use less camera gain to brighten the image up. Gain Noise will blur fainter details. Did the Unisys NAM 300 mb predicted turbulence map indicate seeing was going to be great or is that still a "hit or miss" thing? Thanks in advance.. Milton Aupperle http://www.outcastsoft.com/AstroImages/AstroIndex.html |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
ASTRO: Mars 11-09-07 in very good seeing
Thanks guys. Milton, based on the few times I've imaged since you gave me
that link, it appears to be quite accurate and anything below "50" on the map would make seeing average - good. Anything above 50, so far, has yielded less than average at best. I still need a few more weeks of observing/imaging to get a better idea of things though. It is looking like a great tool that can save me a lot of frustration in regards to when to set up and image and when not to. Joel "Milton Aupperle" wrote in message ... In article , J.Warren wrote: Thanks guys. That image was captured at 30fps. I shot about 15gig worth of avis and I believe 7.5fps gave me the best result. Its a bit sharper. begin 666 Hi Joel; Very nice images. Probably the reason you got sharper images at 7.5 fps versus 30 is because you use less camera gain to brighten the image up. Gain Noise will blur fainter details. Did the Unisys NAM 300 mb predicted turbulence map indicate seeing was going to be great or is that still a "hit or miss" thing? Thanks in advance.. Milton Aupperle http://www.outcastsoft.com/AstroImages/AstroIndex.html |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
ASTRO: Mars 11-09-07 in very good seeing
"J.Warren" wrote .... So far one of my better results of this apparition. Great image! You must have excellent seeing. George N |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
ASTRO: Good Images One and All | Doug W. | Astro Pictures | 6 | June 26th 07 02:24 AM |
A Good Review From ESA Astro.! | surfduke | Policy | 0 | January 21st 07 10:16 PM |
ASTRO: Any good but lesser known astro sites? | Jeff Hopkins | Astro Pictures | 3 | January 20th 07 08:17 PM |
Good astro binocular, really | Stephen Paul | Amateur Astronomy | 0 | November 14th 05 05:17 PM |
I think this will be a very good camera for Astro | AP | Amateur Astronomy | 2 | January 3rd 05 12:37 AM |