|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
At sea-level NOBODY has gone faster than 600KPH, but you believe that they reach 1200KPH, don't you?
Lo, many moons past, on 24 Feb 2004 10:47:08 -0800, a stranger called
by some (bart janssens) came forth and told this tale in alt.atheism This is a typical example of doublethink. From the point of your OWN EXPERIENCE and of your OWN EMPIRICAL METHOD...you never experienced a velocity of more than 600KPH at sea-level...and you really do not know a honest person that has gone faster than 600KPH at sea-level, however you probably "follow" the believe that many men have already broken the sound-barrier at sea-level, which means that those men went FASTER than 1200KPH at sea-level... The Thrust-SSC went 1,227.98579 kmh on 15 October 1997. The feat was well documented by many observers, and the records are available. http://www.thrustssc.com/Latest_News...d_Article.html In order to neutralize this contradiction most people believe that is FORBIDDEN BY LAW TO DEMONSTRATE THE BREAKING OF THE SOUND-BARRIER, and to go faster than 1200KPH, because of the supersonic bang,... It was all over the news, loser. In 1990, a SR-71 reconissance plane left Edwards Air Force Base in Southern California, and 68 minutes later landed in Washington D.C. at Andrews Air Force Base. Since this was the supposed last flight of the Blackbird, the USAF had a lot of fun announcing the time. That's roughly 2,300 miles. And an average speed of 2,000 mph (3,218kph). Since the SR-71 needs to be refueled on take off, top speed was much higher... around Mach 3 (2,350mph) Again, this trip was well documented. The two-man crew was photographed climbing into the bird in California, and climbing out in D.C. In addition, they signed for the bird in both places... the two sets of signatures are time-stamped. So, in the end, you are a moron. -- Douglas Berry Do the OBVIOUS thing to send e-mail Atheist #2147, Atheist Vet #5 Ezekiel 13:20 "Wherefore thus saith the Lord GOD; Behold, I am against your pillows" |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
At sea-level NOBODY has gone faster than 600KPH, but you believe that they reach 1200KPH, don't you?
"Douglas Berry" wrote in message ... In 1990, a SR-71 reconissance plane left Edwards Air Force Base in Southern California, and 68 minutes later landed in Washington D.C. at Andrews Air Force Base. Since this was the supposed last flight of the Blackbird, the USAF had a lot of fun announcing the time. That's roughly 2,300 miles. And an average speed of 2,000 mph (3,218kph). Since the SR-71 needs to be refueled on take off, top speed was much higher... around Mach 3 (2,350mph) Again, this trip was well documented. The two-man crew was photographed climbing into the bird in California, and climbing out in D.C. In addition, they signed for the bird in both places... the two sets of signatures are time-stamped. So, in the end, you are a moron. -- OK, but were these flights at sea level? I think maybe Bart's contention is that the speed is impossible at sea level - though I can't for the life of me imagine why he thinks that... |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
At sea-level NOBODY has gone faster than 600KPH, but you believe that they reach 1200KPH, don't you?
"Douglas Berry" wrote in message ... In 1990, a SR-71 reconissance plane left Edwards Air Force Base in Southern California, and 68 minutes later landed in Washington D.C. at Andrews Air Force Base. Since this was the supposed last flight of the Blackbird, the USAF had a lot of fun announcing the time. That's roughly 2,300 miles. And an average speed of 2,000 mph (3,218kph). Since the SR-71 needs to be refueled on take off, top speed was much higher... around Mach 3 (2,350mph) Again, this trip was well documented. The two-man crew was photographed climbing into the bird in California, and climbing out in D.C. In addition, they signed for the bird in both places... the two sets of signatures are time-stamped. So, in the end, you are a moron. -- OK, but were these flights at sea level? I think maybe Bart's contention is that the speed is impossible at sea level - though I can't for the life of me imagine why he thinks that... |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
At sea-level NOBODY has gone faster than 600KPH, but you believe that they reach 1200KPH, don't you?
(bart janssens) wrote in message news:
This is a typical example of doublethink. Sounds like double-talk to me. http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/barrier/boom/ Go here to learn about sonic booms, which take place at 1220 Kph. Or 750 Mph. Wheeled vehicles have reportedly reached speeds in excess of 600 mph. However friction and resistance of tires, etc. make it hard for a wheeled vehicle to go past the sound barrier. Airplanes however do it all the time. The rest of what you wrote is pretty stupid stuff. Saint |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
At sea-level NOBODY has gone faster than 600KPH, but you believe that they reach 1200KPH, don't you?
(bart janssens) wrote in message news:
This is a typical example of doublethink. Sounds like double-talk to me. http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/barrier/boom/ Go here to learn about sonic booms, which take place at 1220 Kph. Or 750 Mph. Wheeled vehicles have reportedly reached speeds in excess of 600 mph. However friction and resistance of tires, etc. make it hard for a wheeled vehicle to go past the sound barrier. Airplanes however do it all the time. The rest of what you wrote is pretty stupid stuff. Saint |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
At sea-level NOBODY has gone faster than 600KPH, but you believe that they reach 1200KPH, don't you?
"Mark K. Bilbo" -amikchi wrote in message -amikchi...
On % in episode we saw our hero (bart janssens): This is a typical example of doublethink. From the point of your OWN EXPERIENCE and of your OWN EMPIRICAL METHOD...you never experienced a velocity of more than 600KPH at sea-level...and you really do not know a honest person that has gone faster than 600KPH at sea-level, however you probably "follow" the believe that many men have already broken the sound-barrier at sea-level, which means that those men went FASTER than 1200KPH at sea-level... In order to neutralize this contradiction most people believe that is FORBIDDEN BY LAW TO DEMONSTRATE THE BREAKING OF THE SOUND-BARRIER, and to go faster than 1200KPH, because of the supersonic bang,... and then they simply forget the difference between 600KPH and 1200KPH.... None of this makes any damn sense. I see no reason to doubt reports that the speed of sound was exceeded on the ground. What would stop them? Do you know any report that a speed of 600KPH was exceeded by a man at sea-level? So, why do you believe that the speed of sound (1200KPH) was exceeded at sea-level? Or, are you a double-speaker? My words: And if you claim that "2+2=5" and "600=1200", than you can easily believe that space-travel, which needs 28000KPH, is possible... Well, *somebody put some satellites up there. I even watch TV off of one... ....there are some (natural) satellites, like the moon and the asteroids and the ionosphere.... But, why is necessary to claim that "somebody" has put them there? You are like a christian who sees proof of the existence of God, because God PUT "man in the garden of Eden".... |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
At sea-level NOBODY has gone faster than 600KPH, but you believe that they reach 1200KPH, don't you?
"Mark K. Bilbo" -amikchi wrote in message -amikchi...
On % in episode we saw our hero (bart janssens): This is a typical example of doublethink. From the point of your OWN EXPERIENCE and of your OWN EMPIRICAL METHOD...you never experienced a velocity of more than 600KPH at sea-level...and you really do not know a honest person that has gone faster than 600KPH at sea-level, however you probably "follow" the believe that many men have already broken the sound-barrier at sea-level, which means that those men went FASTER than 1200KPH at sea-level... In order to neutralize this contradiction most people believe that is FORBIDDEN BY LAW TO DEMONSTRATE THE BREAKING OF THE SOUND-BARRIER, and to go faster than 1200KPH, because of the supersonic bang,... and then they simply forget the difference between 600KPH and 1200KPH.... None of this makes any damn sense. I see no reason to doubt reports that the speed of sound was exceeded on the ground. What would stop them? Do you know any report that a speed of 600KPH was exceeded by a man at sea-level? So, why do you believe that the speed of sound (1200KPH) was exceeded at sea-level? Or, are you a double-speaker? My words: And if you claim that "2+2=5" and "600=1200", than you can easily believe that space-travel, which needs 28000KPH, is possible... Well, *somebody put some satellites up there. I even watch TV off of one... ....there are some (natural) satellites, like the moon and the asteroids and the ionosphere.... But, why is necessary to claim that "somebody" has put them there? You are like a christian who sees proof of the existence of God, because God PUT "man in the garden of Eden".... |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
At sea-level NOBODY has gone faster than 600KPH, but you believe that they reach 1200KPH, don't you?
(bart janssens) wrote in message . com...
This is a typical example of doublethink. From the point of your OWN EXPERIENCE and of your OWN EMPIRICAL METHOD...you never experienced a velocity of more than 600KPH at sea-level...and you really do not know a honest person that has gone faster than 600KPH at sea-level, however you probably "follow" the believe that many men have already broken the sound-barrier at sea-level, which means that those men went FASTER than 1200KPH at sea-level... In order to neutralize this contradiction most people believe that is FORBIDDEN BY LAW TO DEMONSTRATE THE BREAKING OF THE SOUND-BARRIER, and to go faster than 1200KPH, because of the supersonic bang,... and then they simply forget the difference between 600KPH and 1200KPH.... In the book "1984" you can read the following sentences. "In Newspeak there is no word for Science. The EMPIRICAL method of thought, on which all the scientific achievements of the past were founded, is opposed to the most fundamental principles of Ingsoc. And even technological progress only happens when its products can in some way be used for the diminution of human liberty." "War is a way of shattering to pieces, or POURING INTO THE STRATOSPHERE, or sinking in the depths of the sea, materials which might otherwise be used to make the masses too comfortable, and hence, in the long run, too intelligent" My words: And if you claim that "2+2=5" and "600=1200", than you can easily believe that space-travel, which needs 28000KPH, is possible... Do the doublethink-test: http://home.sprintmail.com/~astronom...nts/dttest.htm Go to www.geocities.com/markpeeters96/a.html www.geocities.com/markpeeters96/proof1.html www.geocities.com/markpeeters96/aa.html |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
At sea-level NOBODY has gone faster than 600KPH, but you believe that they reach 1200KPH, don't you?
"bart janssens" wrote in message om... "Mark K. Bilbo" -amikchi wrote in message -amikchi... On % in episode we saw our hero (bart janssens): This is a typical example of doublethink. From the point of your OWN EXPERIENCE and of your OWN EMPIRICAL METHOD...you never experienced a velocity of more than 600KPH at sea-level...and you really do not know a honest person that has gone faster than 600KPH at sea-level, however you probably "follow" the believe that many men have already broken the sound-barrier at sea-level, which means that those men went FASTER than 1200KPH at sea-level... In order to neutralize this contradiction most people believe that is FORBIDDEN BY LAW TO DEMONSTRATE THE BREAKING OF THE SOUND-BARRIER, and to go faster than 1200KPH, because of the supersonic bang,... and then they simply forget the difference between 600KPH and 1200KPH.... None of this makes any damn sense. I see no reason to doubt reports that the speed of sound was exceeded on the ground. What would stop them? Do you know any report that a speed of 600KPH was exceeded by a man at sea-level? Are pictures good enough for you? http://www2.hawaii.edu/~csutter/tomcat3.htm http://www.docdailey.com/f14flyby.htm This link cites the overpressure measured resulting from supersonic aircraft at altitudes of less than 100 feet. http://library.thinkquest.org/12228/Page3.html So, why do you believe that the speed of sound (1200KPH) was exceeded at sea-level? Or, are you a double-speaker? My words: And if you claim that "2+2=5" and "600=1200", than you can easily believe that space-travel, which needs 28000KPH, is possible... Well, *somebody put some satellites up there. I even watch TV off of one... ...there are some (natural) satellites, like the moon and the asteroids and the ionosphere.... But, why is necessary to claim that "somebody" has put them there? You are like a christian who sees proof of the existence of God, because God PUT "man in the garden of Eden".... |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Mexican AF UFO Photo | Bob Carlson | Astronomy Misc | 68 | May 22nd 04 03:24 AM |
South American Glaciers Melting Faster, Changing Sea Level | Ron Baalke | Space Shuttle | 0 | October 17th 03 12:24 AM |