#1
|
|||
|
|||
Arrow of Time
On Jun 21, 6:44*am, Yousuf Khan wrote:
On 6/20/2010 9:14 AM, Sam wrote: On Jun 19, 1:58 pm, *wrote: Sam Time *has 5 arrows * *TreBert 3.1 The thermodynamic arrow of time 3.2 The cosmological arrow of time 3.3 The radiative arrow of time 3.4 The causal arrow of time 3.5 The particle physics (weak) arrow of time 3.6 The quantum arrow of time 3.7 The psychological/perceptual arrow of time As far as I'm concerned, the thermodynamic, cosmological, radiative, causal and psychological/perceptual arrows of time are all the same thing: basically the causal arrow of time. It's the quantum and particle physics arrows that are slightly different. The quantum arrow probably represents what the universe was like before the Big Bang. Particles would come together, and fall apart, and back again without any structures being built or accumulating. The Big Bang imparted a momentum in a specific direction of space, which we now call "causal" time, where particles travel in the same direction and eventually collide to form bonds, which form structures, which accumulate as they travel through time. The particle physics arrow of time is the weird half-way point between the quantum arrow and the causal arrow. The particle physics arrow describes the lowest level of particles at which we see a causal arrow emerge, i.e. within the kaons. If the direction of time were reversed, then we'd have a universe dominated by anti-matter, because 1% more kaons would decay into anti-matter over matter, rather than the other way around. But we'd still see causality progress the same way. Also we'd likely have renamed anti-matter into matter, and vice-versa. * * * * Yousuf Khan Observers can have different perspectives of time. That has been confirmed. Best to keep in mind the effects of SR depends upon how fast one moves. We must always have "time dilation" and Lorentz contraction in our thinking Stuff is not "absolute" iF eINSTEIN DID not merge space and time I know I would have. They are two sides to the same coin. Always got a kick out of this fact. No matter how fast you chase after a light beam it still retreats from you at c Photons never change speed nor do they bounce. My "Spin is in theory" covers this. TreBert |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Arrow of Time
On 6/25/2010 6:11 AM, bert wrote:
Observers can have different perspectives of time. That has been confirmed. Best to keep in mind the effects of SR depends upon how fast one moves. We must always have "time dilation" and Lorentz contraction in our thinking Stuff is not "absolute" iF eINSTEIN DID not merge space and time I know I would have. They are two sides to the same coin. Always got a kick out of this fact. No matter how fast you chase after a light beam it still retreats from you at c Photons never change speed nor do they bounce. My "Spin is in theory" covers this. TreBert As far as I am concerned, the speed of light is simply the speed at which our universe itself is traveling through the time dimension. Anything that is traveling at the speed of light within the universe, is actually just running backwards to stay put in one spot in time, while the universe runs past it; like holding on for dear life onto the bank of a fast-moving river. That would also explain why causal time stops when traveling at exactly the speed of light. If everything traveled at the speed of light, then causality would stop because everything would stay put in their own given spots in time, neither advancing nor retreating. With no movement, no particles would be able to collide and therefore react to each other. If on the other hand, you were traveling at 99.9% the speed of light, then causal time will have slowed down considerably for you; but you are not yet at 100% light speed, so you will still experience reactions, albeit at a much reduced rate. That which we call time dilation is just fewer reactions occurring at a time. You need something traveling slight faster or slower through time to catch up with you and react with you. At 99.9% light speed, there is still a differential range of speeds of 0.1% light speed to play around in. Even if you were at 99.99% light speed, then you still have 0.01% to play around with. It's only when you get to a full 100% light speed that you got 0% differential to play with. Yousuf Khan |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Arrow of Time
On Jun 25, 1:41*am, Yousuf Khan wrote:
On 6/25/2010 6:11 AM, bert wrote: Observers can have different perspectives of time. That has been confirmed. *Best to keep in mind the effects of SR depends upon how fast one moves. *We must always have "time dilation" and Lorentz contraction in our thinking * Stuff is not "absolute" * iF eINSTEIN DID not merge space and time I know I would have. They are two sides to the same coin. Always got a kick out of this fact. *No matter how fast you chase after a light beam it still retreats from you at c Photons never change speed nor do they bounce. My "Spin is in theory" covers this. * TreBert As far as I am concerned, the speed of light is simply the speed at which our universe itself is traveling through the time dimension. Anything that is traveling at the speed of light within the universe, is actually just running backwards to stay put in one spot in time, while the universe runs past it; like holding on for dear life onto the bank of a fast-moving river. That would also explain why causal time stops when traveling at exactly the speed of light. If everything traveled at the speed of light, then causality would stop because everything would stay put in their own given spots in time, neither advancing nor retreating. With no movement, no particles would be able to collide and therefore react to each other. If on the other hand, you were traveling at 99.9% the speed of light, then causal time will have slowed down considerably for you; but you are not yet at 100% light speed, so you will still experience reactions, albeit at a much reduced rate. That which we call time dilation is just fewer reactions occurring at a time. You need something traveling slight faster or slower through time to catch up with you and react with you. At 99.9% light speed, there is still a differential range of speeds of 0.1% light speed to play around in. Even if you were at 99.99% light speed, then you still have 0.01% to play around with. It's only when you get to a full 100% light speed that you got 0% differential to play with. * * * * Yousuf Khan Good post Faster than light creates great problems. Light slowing down leaves the unanswered question. "What energy kicks it back up to see?" Gravity can't slow down photons. Reality is it makes them give up energy. TreBert |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
The Cosmic Quantum Clock. The Arrow of Time | [email protected] | Astronomy Misc | 2 | September 30th 07 11:11 AM |
Does the Arrow of Time Point in Different Directions? | Double-A | Misc | 5 | June 12th 06 12:44 PM |
Black hole entropy and arrow of time | [email protected] | Astronomy Misc | 0 | May 26th 06 08:37 AM |
Black hole entropy and arrow of time | [email protected] | Astronomy Misc | 0 | May 15th 06 06:26 AM |