|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
[fitsbits] Abuse of EXTEND keyword
On Thursday 23 August 2007 03:25, Tim Pearson wrote:
My guess (it's a long time ago) is that there were FITS files out * there that had special records that did not conform to the rules for * standard extensions, so the EXTEND keyword was needed. Or perhaps * Grosbøl et al wanted to leave open the possibility of other uses for * the special records, which would be indicated by different header * keywords. At the time, special records were used (most noticeable by random groups). Thus, it was important to have a flag (EXTEND=T) to indicate that the file conformed to the new rules for FITS extensions. Due to the wide usage of random groups, special rules were introduced to allow coexistence but other less used types of special records existed. This flagging function (as used with GROUPS=T in random groups) indicates that all special records conform, as stated in the last part of the sentence. Thus, EXTEND=F could mean one of two things: 1) the writer knew about the new rules for extensions but did not care/conform, or 2) there are no extensions (which however is a subcase of EXTEND=T). As I said previously, it also visually showed the user, by listing the primary header, that information could be present in extensions. During the introduction of the extension rules, the lack of EXTEND=T showed clearly that the writer did not know about the new rules. Now almost 20 years later, this is not an issues. We may ask if anybody know of FITS files (possibly archival) which use their own 'special' special records. Even so I see no major problem in making the keyword optional butit's not a significant issue. I prefer such flags (GROUPS, BLOCKED, EXTEND) as they, by nature, just indicated an additional convention. If one introduces an explicit version, it may be too easy to make (too) strong changes. Preben PS: I do notice and appreciate the 'ø'. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
[fitsbits] Fwd: multiple keyword occurance in header | Arnold Rots | FITS | 0 | August 21st 07 02:32 PM |
[fitsbits] Fwd: multiple keyword occurance in header | Walter Jaffe | FITS | 0 | August 21st 07 12:37 PM |
[fitsbits] Clarification of EXTEND, please | Stephen Walton | FITS | 8 | May 19th 04 12:53 AM |
[fitsbits] Clarification of EXTEND, please | Thierry Forveille | FITS | 0 | May 14th 04 06:31 PM |
[fitsbits] BLANK keyword misinterpretation | Steve Allen | FITS | 4 | November 21st 03 04:42 PM |