#31
|
|||
|
|||
"*" wrote in message ... On 16 Mar 2004 16:16:38 -0800, (George William Herbert) wrote: In article , * wrote: Okay Mr. Arrogant Scientist, why did the scientific community allow this: NASA never allowed independent scientific peer review of Malin's Mars MOC photographs and instead allowed Malin to keep and own US government property which is against the law. That is a false statement. No at all, and you're hedging and not being honest. I doubt you're a scientist at all. Science is supposed to be about honesty. You obviously would prefer to be ignorant and confrontational rather than actually understand, but we'll give you a few more tries at clue. Abusive cuss, aren't you. I've obviously touched a nerve there. I've got a clue for you. I met the guy who signed the checks to Malin for doctoring the MOC photographs. Really. Why not give his name. Since I know the guy responsible for putting photos on Malin's website. I'm sure we can have a good old get together. snip bullshiddo |
#32
|
|||
|
|||
"*" wrote in message ... On 16 Mar 2004 16:16:38 -0800, (George William Herbert) wrote: Proprietary periods in space mission data exist to give the scientists who build the instruments some time to write up their papers and get credit for the work they have done building and operating the instruments. Liar. Again, claims w/o proof. The fact is, George is in fact right and you are wrong, as a quick perusal of Google would show. |
#33
|
|||
|
|||
|
#34
|
|||
|
|||
"*" wrote in message ... On 16 Mar 2004 16:16:38 -0800, (George William Herbert) wrote: During Malin's 'proprietary period' Malin has *exclusive ownership* of the MOC photographs, and during that time Malin and his staff doctor the photographs. Now you're just making a fool of yourself and being abusing your account. You don't need to reply to every sentence separately. |
#35
|
|||
|
|||
On Wed, 17 Mar 2004 00:32:58 GMT, "Greg D. Moore \(Strider\)"
wrote: "*" wrote in message .. . On 16 Mar 2004 16:16:38 -0800, (George William Herbert) wrote: In article , * wrote: Okay Mr. Arrogant Scientist, why did the scientific community allow this: NASA never allowed independent scientific peer review of Malin's Mars MOC photographs and instead allowed Malin to keep and own US government property which is against the law. That is a false statement. No at all, and you're hedging and not being honest. I doubt you're a scientist at all. Science is supposed to be about honesty. You obviously would prefer to be ignorant and confrontational rather than actually understand, but we'll give you a few more tries at clue. Abusive cuss, aren't you. I've obviously touched a nerve there. I've got a clue for you. I met the guy who signed the checks to Malin for doctoring the MOC photographs. Really. Why not give his name. I'll publish a web site with all the names if you like. I'm sure the guy won't appreciate it, but if you insist. Since I know the guy responsible for putting photos on Malin's website. I'm sure we can have a good old get together. The web site manager has no clue. snip bullshiddo |
#36
|
|||
|
|||
On Wed, 17 Mar 2004 00:33:27 GMT, "Greg D. Moore \(Strider\)"
wrote: "*" wrote in message .. . On 16 Mar 2004 16:16:38 -0800, (George William Herbert) wrote: Proprietary periods in space mission data exist to give the scientists who build the instruments some time to write up their papers and get credit for the work they have done building and operating the instruments. Liar. Again, claims w/o proof. Okay smart ass, why are the MOC photos coded during transmission from Mars to earth? The fact is, George is in fact right and you are wrong, as a quick perusal of Google would show. A quick perusal of google will show nothing. |
#37
|
|||
|
|||
On Wed, 17 Mar 2004 00:34:30 GMT, "Greg D. Moore \(Strider\)"
wrote: "*" wrote in message .. . On 16 Mar 2004 16:16:38 -0800, (George William Herbert) wrote: During Malin's 'proprietary period' Malin has *exclusive ownership* of the MOC photographs, and during that time Malin and his staff doctor the photographs. Now you're just making a fool of yourself and being abusing your account. You failed logic 101 didn't you? You don't need to reply to every sentence separately. Killing the messenger is a logical fallacy. |
#38
|
|||
|
|||
"*" wrote in message ... On Wed, 17 Mar 2004 00:34:30 GMT, "Greg D. Moore \(Strider\)" wrote: "*" wrote in message .. . On 16 Mar 2004 16:16:38 -0800, (George William Herbert) wrote: During Malin's 'proprietary period' Malin has *exclusive ownership* of the MOC photographs, and during that time Malin and his staff doctor the photographs. Now you're just making a fool of yourself and being abusing your account. You failed logic 101 didn't you? Actually no, passed it with flying colors. Finished the 3 hour final exam in 34 minutes. And that was after double-checking my answers. But that's for asking. You don't need to reply to every sentence separately. Killing the messenger is a logical fallacy. Not even. |
#39
|
|||
|
|||
"*" wrote in message ... On Wed, 17 Mar 2004 00:33:27 GMT, "Greg D. Moore \(Strider\)" wrote: The fact is, George is in fact right and you are wrong, as a quick perusal of Google would show. A quick perusal of google will show nothing. Funnny, I get over 29,000 repsonses. That's a whole lot of nothing. |
#40
|
|||
|
|||
On Wed, 17 Mar 2004 00:39:30 GMT, "Greg D. Moore \(Strider\)"
wrote: "*" wrote in message .. . On Wed, 17 Mar 2004 00:34:30 GMT, "Greg D. Moore \(Strider\)" wrote: "*" wrote in message .. . On 16 Mar 2004 16:16:38 -0800, (George William Herbert) wrote: During Malin's 'proprietary period' Malin has *exclusive ownership* of the MOC photographs, and during that time Malin and his staff doctor the photographs. Now you're just making a fool of yourself and being abusing your account. You failed logic 101 didn't you? Actually no, passed it with flying colors. Finished the 3 hour final exam in 34 minutes. And that was after double-checking my answers. But that's for asking. You don't need to reply to every sentence separately. Killing the messenger is a logical fallacy. Not even. Yeah it is troll boy. I didn't' fail logic 101 either, as you full well know. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Hoagland a fraud? | * | Policy | 129 | March 30th 04 06:20 AM |
Electric Gravity&Instantaneous Light | ralph sansbury | Astronomy Misc | 8 | August 31st 03 02:53 AM |