A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Astronomy and Astrophysics » Astronomy Misc
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

negative mass



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old September 29th 05, 11:24 AM
brian a m stuckless
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default negative mass

There is NEGATiVE mass ..in the GUESS Model.!!
The GUESS *SiGNETiC* mass, mS = (n - 1)*m1 .!!
Where n = Cavity of m1 DisCHARGE mass mD / m1.

MORE mass MAY be DisCHARGED, from a CAViTY of
TEST mass m1 than all the mass of m1, itself.!

$ SMALL mass minus BiG mass is NEGATiVE mass $
EARTth mass - Sun mass = NEGATiVE mass, duh.!!

PROOF: Delta mass = 1*kg - 2*kg = - 1*kg .!!

G~FORCE FRAME of REFERENCE:
G*M1*m1 / r1^2 = m1*(n - 1)*v1^2 / r1.!!

VERY sincerely u c,
```Brian
GROUP search info-itsy-bitsy bytes it .

wrote:
Dear friends,
If you are aware of modelling constraints such as rigid supports and
connections using penalty functions, you may be interested in this.

There may not be a "negative mass" in the universe but just as the
concept of "imaginary number" helps to solve a vast range of
mathematical problems the concept of negative mass can be used to solve
some vibration problems.

The natural frequencies of an object depend on constraints such as the
requirement that the movement of a bridge be zero at the supports. In
some computational methods, the vibratory displaced form of the object
is expressed as a series of assumed shapes, each conforming to the
support constraints. The natural frequencies and vibration modes of the
object are then determined by applying the physical law governing the
motion. In the popular energy method known as the Rayleigh-Ritz method,
this is achieved by minimising an energy function. This procedure
allows the contribution from each assumed shape to be adjusted in such
a way as to produce the best possible estimate of the natural
frequencies and modes.

This is part of a media release I prepared for one of my Royal Society
publications.
If you are interested in this please visit
http://www.geocities.com/Ilanko/negativemass.htm or
http://www.geocities.com/Ilanko/vibration.htm

Please note my site is one of the free geocities site and has a maximum
data transfer limit. Therefore, please download the interactive
programs only if you need them for teaching or research. If you are
interested in doing postgraduate or collaborative research in this area
please feel free to email me.

Regards.
Ilanko.



  #2  
Old September 29th 05, 01:32 PM
Mahmoud In My Dinner Jacket
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Einstein's stress-energy equation allows that objects with a net
internal strain will have a negative gravitational field.

And WOT would happen, via Mach's Principle, if the overall
gravitational field of the Universe were negative (accelerating
Universe)? Wouldn't that mean that all inertial mass would be negative?

  #3  
Old September 30th 05, 11:21 AM
Autymn D. C.
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Mahmoud, that's a vector and not scalar negative. Scientists are
careles (adj.) fools:
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.s...51a4edc72c446a.

-Aut

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
The Gravitational Instability Cosmological Theory Br Dan Izzo Astronomy Misc 0 August 31st 04 02:35 AM
Beyond Linear Cosmology and Hypnotic Theology Yoda Misc 0 June 30th 04 07:33 PM
Mind-2, Time waves and Theory of Everything Yoda Misc 0 April 20th 04 06:11 AM
Galaxies without dark matter halos? greywolf42 Astronomy Misc 34 November 5th 03 01:34 PM
Ned Wright's TBBNH Page (C) Bjoern Feuerbacher Astronomy Misc 24 October 2nd 03 06:50 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:00 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.