|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Saw Mars! But it was small.
The weather finally cleared and I could get my new toy out (a Meade
ETX-70AT) and look at Mars. I keep reading that Mars is currently something like 1/70 or 1/75 the size of the full moon. The ETX-70AT has a 350 mm focal length, I put a 4 mm (Plossl) eyepiece on it with a 2x Barlow, that should give me 2 x (350 / 4) = 175x, right? It was definitely round, and had a white blob in the lower left, and it kept wandering from lower right to upper left in the view finder, but shouldn't it have been something 2.5x the size of the moon? I realize I'm a couple days past the *best* viewing, but the clouds weren't cooperating - is Mars already that much further away, that it's that much smaller already? Thanks! C p.s. As a newcomer to astronomy, what would you recommend would be my next target? Will I be able to see the rings of Saturn with this telescope? When would be the best time of year? Thanks! |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
"Chris Cooper" wrote:
The weather finally cleared and I could get my new toy out (a Meade ETX-70AT) and look at Mars. I keep reading that Mars is currently something like 1/70 or 1/75 the size of the full moon. The ETX-70AT has a 350 mm focal length, I put a 4 mm (Plossl) eyepiece on it with a 2x Barlow, that should give me 2 x (350 / 4) = 175x, right? It was definitely round, and had a white blob in the lower left, and it kept wandering from lower right to upper left in the view finder, but shouldn't it have been something 2.5x the size of the moon? I realize I'm a couple days past the *best* viewing, but the clouds weren't cooperating - is Mars already that much further away, that it's that much smaller already? Thanks! C p.s. As a newcomer to astronomy, what would you recommend would be my next target? Will I be able to see the rings of Saturn with this telescope? When would be the best time of year? Thanks! Chris: I am glad to hear that you got yourself a telescope and wandered out to explore the skies I would just make a few observations: 1. Mars is always a difficult object to observe and it is usually disappointing (dust storms, low in the horizon, few distinct surface features, and it is just pretty far away) 2. Unfortunately (or fortunately) a lot of people got all excited about Mars being so close this time around. However, people expect Hubble telescope-like images when they try to observe it with their modest telescopes. While this is great since it has gotten people out to explore the skies, it is bad in the sense of the raised expectations put forth by the media. There is simply no way you'll be able to see Mars as clear as some of the photos you've seen. The white blob that you saw was probably the polar cap and perhaps you were able to see some surface features (usually looks like a dark X about the Mars' surface). In order to see some color you would have to take a long exposure photograph with a camera or a good CCD (and even then you would have to do some correction in Photoshop or similar). However, think about what you saw, you were able to discern the polar cap of an object that is 35 million miles away!! 3. As to having missed the big event of Mars opposition, don't worry. Mars was in fact further away when you saw it, but the distances are so great that it would not have made any discernable difference if you had been the first one to see it on Wednesday. 4. As to your question about Saturn, yes you WILL be able to see its rings (in varying degrees of detail). Certainly, with an instrument like yours, you will be able to see the Cassini Division and maybe the rings' shadow on the face of Saturn. It will be a more satisfying object to see if you are a beginner, and you will never forget your first sight of it. Many professional astronomers, turn their scopes to Saturn simply because of the thrill of the view. I know that I use it as the first object to show people the first time they are out with a telescope 5. Saturn right now, assuming you are in the US, is about 20 degrees (pretty low in the horizon) with about .07 magnitude, which is pretty bright. It rises at about 1:30 AM ET and sets at about 4:30 AM ET you can find it in the Gemini constellation. As to the best time to view, well, winter is usually best seeing, since warm air currents are at a minimum. Hope you enjoy your telescope, but don't limit yourself to planets! There are some awesome sights out there. My recommendation is that you get yourself a field/star manual or software (i.e. Deepsky) and set yourself some goals/targets every time you go out. You will appreciate the skies more that way. Happy to have you join us amateur astronomers! Don |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Thanks for the info and advice!
I was aware of the issues with the terrestrial air currents etc. that would greatly limit the detail I would be able to see - but I'm still not sure why the image I saw was so _small_ in the viewfinder. It was definitely not just a point, and as I increased magnification (with the different eyepieces) it definitely got bigger, but it was never 2.5x the size of the moon, which is what I expected. Or was it? Did it just _seem_ smaller because of the lack of detail? This was just a quick visit to a nearby dark street - so I fully expected the city lights and pollution to decrease the amount of detail I would be able to see. And yes, it was pretty cool to see the polar ice caps! Chris "Don" wrote in message ... "Chris Cooper" wrote: The weather finally cleared and I could get my new toy out (a Meade ETX-70AT) and look at Mars. I keep reading that Mars is currently something like 1/70 or 1/75 the size of the full moon. The ETX-70AT has a 350 mm focal length, I put a 4 mm (Plossl) eyepiece on it with a 2x Barlow, that should give me 2 x (350 / 4) = 175x, right? It was definitely round, and had a white blob in the lower left, and it kept wandering from lower right to upper left in the view finder, but shouldn't it have been something 2.5x the size of the moon? I realize I'm a couple days past the *best* viewing, but the clouds weren't cooperating - is Mars already that much further away, that it's that much smaller already? Thanks! C p.s. As a newcomer to astronomy, what would you recommend would be my next target? Will I be able to see the rings of Saturn with this telescope? When would be the best time of year? Thanks! Chris: I am glad to hear that you got yourself a telescope and wandered out to explore the skies I would just make a few observations: 1. Mars is always a difficult object to observe and it is usually disappointing (dust storms, low in the horizon, few distinct surface features, and it is just pretty far away) 2. Unfortunately (or fortunately) a lot of people got all excited about Mars being so close this time around. However, people expect Hubble telescope-like images when they try to observe it with their modest telescopes. While this is great since it has gotten people out to explore the skies, it is bad in the sense of the raised expectations put forth by the media. There is simply no way you'll be able to see Mars as clear as some of the photos you've seen. The white blob that you saw was probably the polar cap and perhaps you were able to see some surface features (usually looks like a dark X about the Mars' surface). In order to see some color you would have to take a long exposure photograph with a camera or a good CCD (and even then you would have to do some correction in Photoshop or similar). However, think about what you saw, you were able to discern the polar cap of an object that is 35 million miles away!! 3. As to having missed the big event of Mars opposition, don't worry. Mars was in fact further away when you saw it, but the distances are so great that it would not have made any discernable difference if you had been the first one to see it on Wednesday. 4. As to your question about Saturn, yes you WILL be able to see its rings (in varying degrees of detail). Certainly, with an instrument like yours, you will be able to see the Cassini Division and maybe the rings' shadow on the face of Saturn. It will be a more satisfying object to see if you are a beginner, and you will never forget your first sight of it. Many professional astronomers, turn their scopes to Saturn simply because of the thrill of the view. I know that I use it as the first object to show people the first time they are out with a telescope 5. Saturn right now, assuming you are in the US, is about 20 degrees (pretty low in the horizon) with about .07 magnitude, which is pretty bright. It rises at about 1:30 AM ET and sets at about 4:30 AM ET you can find it in the Gemini constellation. As to the best time to view, well, winter is usually best seeing, since warm air currents are at a minimum. Hope you enjoy your telescope, but don't limit yourself to planets! There are some awesome sights out there. My recommendation is that you get yourself a field/star manual or software (i.e. Deepsky) and set yourself some goals/targets every time you go out. You will appreciate the skies more that way. Happy to have you join us amateur astronomers! Don |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
I am at 45 deg North and 93 deg West, so I thought midnight would be
tolerable okay for seeing Mars. I wasn't able to find it (but my optical tools are very primitive) and suspected Mars was hanging too close to the horizon (any old tree or haze would block). I have been told that the planets precess in their appearance near the zodiacle constellations. I suppose there are tables somewhere but might there be some fairly simple algorithms for reckoning? Thanks, |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
but shouldn't it have been something 2.5x the size of the moon?
Mars may be 2.5X the moon's diameter but it's a lot further away. If you could see it as an 1/8 inch blob with a bright cap you're doing well. A larger instrument might show more surface detail but not a much bigger image. In my 10" F6 I can push it up to about a 1/4 "diameter but it's blurred out and not very steady. Keep doing what you're doing, and if you're not sure; ask :-)) jc --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.514 / Virus Database: 312 - Release Date: 28/08/2003 |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
I'm glad you explained this. People watch the evening news and get the
impression that they will see what the reporter is seeing at the local observatory! I think the news reporters do a disservice by not making it clear that you will not see what they are seeing unless you go where they are and use the equipment they are using. Phyloe "Don" wrote in message ... "Chris Cooper" wrote: The weather finally cleared and I could get my new toy out (a Meade ETX-70AT) and look at Mars. I keep reading that Mars is currently something like 1/70 or 1/75 the size of the full moon. The ETX-70AT has a 350 mm focal length, I put a 4 mm (Plossl) eyepiece on it with a 2x Barlow, that should give me 2 x (350 / 4) = 175x, right? It was definitely round, and had a white blob in the lower left, and it kept wandering from lower right to upper left in the view finder, but shouldn't it have been something 2.5x the size of the moon? I realize I'm a couple days past the *best* viewing, but the clouds weren't cooperating - is Mars already that much further away, that it's that much smaller already? Thanks! C p.s. As a newcomer to astronomy, what would you recommend would be my next target? Will I be able to see the rings of Saturn with this telescope? When would be the best time of year? Thanks! Chris: I am glad to hear that you got yourself a telescope and wandered out to explore the skies I would just make a few observations: 1. Mars is always a difficult object to observe and it is usually disappointing (dust storms, low in the horizon, few distinct surface features, and it is just pretty far away) 2. Unfortunately (or fortunately) a lot of people got all excited about Mars being so close this time around. However, people expect Hubble telescope-like images when they try to observe it with their modest telescopes. While this is great since it has gotten people out to explore the skies, it is bad in the sense of the raised expectations put forth by the media. There is simply no way you'll be able to see Mars as clear as some of the photos you've seen. The white blob that you saw was probably the polar cap and perhaps you were able to see some surface features (usually looks like a dark X about the Mars' surface). In order to see some color you would have to take a long exposure photograph with a camera or a good CCD (and even then you would have to do some correction in Photoshop or similar). However, think about what you saw, you were able to discern the polar cap of an object that is 35 million miles away!! 3. As to having missed the big event of Mars opposition, don't worry. Mars was in fact further away when you saw it, but the distances are so great that it would not have made any discernable difference if you had been the first one to see it on Wednesday. 4. As to your question about Saturn, yes you WILL be able to see its rings (in varying degrees of detail). Certainly, with an instrument like yours, you will be able to see the Cassini Division and maybe the rings' shadow on the face of Saturn. It will be a more satisfying object to see if you are a beginner, and you will never forget your first sight of it. Many professional astronomers, turn their scopes to Saturn simply because of the thrill of the view. I know that I use it as the first object to show people the first time they are out with a telescope 5. Saturn right now, assuming you are in the US, is about 20 degrees (pretty low in the horizon) with about .07 magnitude, which is pretty bright. It rises at about 1:30 AM ET and sets at about 4:30 AM ET you can find it in the Gemini constellation. As to the best time to view, well, winter is usually best seeing, since warm air currents are at a minimum. Hope you enjoy your telescope, but don't limit yourself to planets! There are some awesome sights out there. My recommendation is that you get yourself a field/star manual or software (i.e. Deepsky) and set yourself some goals/targets every time you go out. You will appreciate the skies more that way. Happy to have you join us amateur astronomers! Don |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
It was definitely round, and had a white blob in the lower left
That is the polar cap. Vince 10" LX200 GPSw/UHTC |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
John Ferman wrote:
I am at 45 deg North and 93 deg West, so I thought midnight would be tolerable okay for seeing Mars. I wasn't able to find it (but my optical tools are very primitive) and suspected Mars was hanging too close to the horizon (any old tree or haze would block). Perhaps you just didn't stay out late enough. You shouldn't need any optical aid at all to find Mars, assuming it wasn't behind clouds. Could you see any stars near the horizon? My horizon is eight or nine degrees higher than yours, but even from here the planet has been unmistakably obvious for several weeks -- whenever weather and forest-fires haven't conspired to hide the sky. I have been told that the planets precess in their appearance near the zodiacle constellations. I suppose there are tables somewhere but might there be some fairly simple algorithms for reckoning? Precession is too slow to make any noticeable difference to an observer. Over the course of a lifetime the heavens appear to shift by only about a degree. All the planets move against the background of the stars very much faster than that; even Pluto covers over 100° of ecliptic longitude in a lifetime. Around now Mars is retrograde (because the earth is passing it), seeming to move backward about a quarter of a degree per day and slowing; it will appear to be stationary near the end of the month. -- Odysseus |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
"Chris Cooper" wrote in
: Thanks for the info and advice! I was aware of the issues with the terrestrial air currents etc. that would greatly limit the detail I would be able to see - but I'm still not sure why the image I saw was so _small_ in the viewfinder. It was definitely not just a point, and as I increased magnification (with the different eyepieces) it definitely got bigger, but it was never 2.5x the size of the moon, which is what I expected. You might be surprised. The Moon is actually quite small to the unaided eye ~ 0.5 degrees. BTW you are already over the maximum useful magnification of your scope. 70mm aperture gives a rule of thumb maximum useful magnification of about (2 x aperture in mm) 140 X for your scope. Or was it? Did it just _seem_ smaller because of the lack of detail? I think so. The effect may have something to do with the overall apparent field of view as well This was just a quick visit to a nearby dark street - so I fully expected the city lights and pollution to decrease the amount of detail I would be able to see. And yes, it was pretty cool to see the polar ice caps! Light pollution isn't too much of a problem for viewing the planets as they are bright anyway. Some people find Mars too bright near opposition and use various filters for viewing. One thing is to make sure that you are not viewing directly over the roof of a building, as the warm air rising off the building (or a large concrete area) can play havoc with the quality of the view. Llanzlan. SNIP |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Earth Has 'Blueberries' Like Mars (Forwarded) | Peter Fairbrother | Policy | 10 | June 20th 04 08:17 PM |
Space Calendar - February 27, 2004 | Ron | Astronomy Misc | 1 | February 27th 04 07:18 PM |
Mars Missions Have International Flavor | Ron Baalke | Astronomy Misc | 0 | December 3rd 03 04:51 PM |
"Europe lands on Mars" -- Media event at ESA/ESOC (Forwarded) | Andrew Yee | Astronomy Misc | 0 | November 25th 03 04:26 PM |
Delta-Like Fan On Mars Suggests Ancient Rivers Were Persistent | Ron Baalke | Science | 0 | November 13th 03 09:06 PM |