A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Space Science » Space Science Misc
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

The Earth



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old January 7th 04, 11:57 PM
LooseChanj
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default The Earth

I was just relaxing in bed staring at my map of the world when I wondered
if ours were a different planet, what bits would be interesting? Where
would we send probes, etc.
--
This is a siggy | To E-mail, do note | This space is for rent
It's properly formatted | who you mean to reply-to | Inquire within if you
No person, none, care | and it will reach me | Would like your ad here

  #2  
Old January 8th 04, 01:23 AM
Engr Bohn
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default The Earth

Good evening,

On Wed, 7 Jan 2004, LooseChanj wrote:

I was just relaxing in bed staring at my map of the world when I wondered
if ours were a different planet, what bits would be interesting? Where
would we send probes, etc.


Assuming we're looking at a program similar to that of the Martian and
Venusian programs, where the first landers are sent before there's
detailed imagery obtained from orbit, then probably the first "landers"
would go to the oceans. Most likely place to find life, and no need to
worry about unexpected terrain.

After there's data from the first orbiters, it'd be awefully tempting to
send something into a jungle, but landing would be a bit problematic --
perhaps some sort of penetrator would be useful.


Take care,
cb

--
Christopher A. Bohn ____________|____________
http://www.cis.ohio-state.edu/~bohn/ ' ** ** " (o) " ** ** '
7 January 1789 -- First US presidential election. Americans voted
for electors who, a month later, chose George Washington as the
nation's first president.

  #3  
Old January 8th 04, 04:07 PM
Jim Kingdon
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default The Earth

probably the first "landers" would go to the oceans. Most likely
place to find life, and no need to worry about unexpected terrain.


Makes me think of Huygens, which will be arriving on Saturn's moon
Titan in June of this year. Although it is mainly designed to return
data on its way down through the atmosphere, there is a possibility it
might land in an ocean of hydrocarbons (ethane, methane, etc). That's
speculation - unlike in the Earth case the clouds are too thick to
really get a good idea of what the surface is like.

As for whether the ocean is an attractive target, I'd say no. It is
hard to point an antenna, a camera, etc, not to mention the
possibility of storms.

After there's data from the first orbiters, it'd be awefully tempting to
send something into a jungle, but landing would be a bit problematic --


As on Mars, the first choices would almost surely be dictated by
engineering considerations - flat areas without too many obstacles.

As for how to get to a jungle (or forest, or mountain range, or
anything), I don't know, there's something to be said for the idea of
having a rover land in a flat area and driving towards the more
difficult terrain.

Another early mission worth considering would be a robotic aircraft.
Because of Earth's thick atmosphere, this is even easier than on Mars,
and depending on how low you can fly, you can get better data than
from Earth orbit.

  #4  
Old January 9th 04, 04:29 AM
Bjørn Ove Isaksen
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default The Earth

Engr Bohn wrote:

Good evening,


After there's data from the first orbiters, it'd be awefully tempting to
send something into a jungle, but landing would be a bit problematic --
perhaps some sort of penetrator would be useful.


And I have seen it on movie. We would land in America.

:-)
Sincerely
Bjørn Ove

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Travelling to Mars Mervo Space Science Misc 7 January 5th 04 04:10 AM
Is a Space Elevator more risky than the shuttle? Henry J. Cobb Space Science Misc 18 October 4th 03 02:06 AM
Past Perfect, Future Misleading Hop David Space Science Misc 67 September 11th 03 07:25 PM
Is big moon in sky plausible? Christopher M. Jones Space Science Misc 7 August 31st 03 12:20 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:19 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.