#1
|
|||
|
|||
The Earth
I was just relaxing in bed staring at my map of the world when I wondered
if ours were a different planet, what bits would be interesting? Where would we send probes, etc. -- This is a siggy | To E-mail, do note | This space is for rent It's properly formatted | who you mean to reply-to | Inquire within if you No person, none, care | and it will reach me | Would like your ad here |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
The Earth
Good evening,
On Wed, 7 Jan 2004, LooseChanj wrote: I was just relaxing in bed staring at my map of the world when I wondered if ours were a different planet, what bits would be interesting? Where would we send probes, etc. Assuming we're looking at a program similar to that of the Martian and Venusian programs, where the first landers are sent before there's detailed imagery obtained from orbit, then probably the first "landers" would go to the oceans. Most likely place to find life, and no need to worry about unexpected terrain. After there's data from the first orbiters, it'd be awefully tempting to send something into a jungle, but landing would be a bit problematic -- perhaps some sort of penetrator would be useful. Take care, cb -- Christopher A. Bohn ____________|____________ http://www.cis.ohio-state.edu/~bohn/ ' ** ** " (o) " ** ** ' 7 January 1789 -- First US presidential election. Americans voted for electors who, a month later, chose George Washington as the nation's first president. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
The Earth
probably the first "landers" would go to the oceans. Most likely
place to find life, and no need to worry about unexpected terrain. Makes me think of Huygens, which will be arriving on Saturn's moon Titan in June of this year. Although it is mainly designed to return data on its way down through the atmosphere, there is a possibility it might land in an ocean of hydrocarbons (ethane, methane, etc). That's speculation - unlike in the Earth case the clouds are too thick to really get a good idea of what the surface is like. As for whether the ocean is an attractive target, I'd say no. It is hard to point an antenna, a camera, etc, not to mention the possibility of storms. After there's data from the first orbiters, it'd be awefully tempting to send something into a jungle, but landing would be a bit problematic -- As on Mars, the first choices would almost surely be dictated by engineering considerations - flat areas without too many obstacles. As for how to get to a jungle (or forest, or mountain range, or anything), I don't know, there's something to be said for the idea of having a rover land in a flat area and driving towards the more difficult terrain. Another early mission worth considering would be a robotic aircraft. Because of Earth's thick atmosphere, this is even easier than on Mars, and depending on how low you can fly, you can get better data than from Earth orbit. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
The Earth
Engr Bohn wrote:
Good evening, After there's data from the first orbiters, it'd be awefully tempting to send something into a jungle, but landing would be a bit problematic -- perhaps some sort of penetrator would be useful. And I have seen it on movie. We would land in America. :-) Sincerely Bjørn Ove |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Travelling to Mars | Mervo | Space Science Misc | 7 | January 5th 04 04:10 AM |
Is a Space Elevator more risky than the shuttle? | Henry J. Cobb | Space Science Misc | 18 | October 4th 03 02:06 AM |
Past Perfect, Future Misleading | Hop David | Space Science Misc | 67 | September 11th 03 07:25 PM |
Is big moon in sky plausible? | Christopher M. Jones | Space Science Misc | 7 | August 31st 03 12:20 PM |