|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
SOLAR ACTIVITY WATCH: The Sun has been mostly quiet for weeks, but...
Space Weather News for July 13, 2004
http://spaceweather.com SOLAR ACTIVITY WATCH: The Sun has been mostly quiet for weeks, but this could soon change. One or more big sunspots are turning toward Earth, raising the possibility of solar flares, geomagnetic storms and auroras in the days and weeks ahead. MORNING STAR: It's not easy waking up at dawn, but this week it's worth doing. Venus, the "morning star," is absolutely brilliant in the eastern sky around sunrise. On July 14th, Venus and the crescent moon will appear side by side--a lovely sight. On July 15th Venus reaches maximum brightness. The planet is delightful to see through a telescope; it looks like a tiny crescent Moon. Visit http://SpaceWeather.com for more information, solar activity updates and sky maps |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
SOLAR ACTIVITY WATCH: The Sun has been mostly quiet for weeks, but...
In article ,
Sam Wormley wrote: On July 15th Venus reaches maximum brightness. No, on that date Venus reaches maximum "brilliancy", which is somewhat different. The "brilliancy" is defined in purely geometrical terms: "maximum brilliancy" occurs when the sunlit part of Venus' disk reaches its largest apparent area. The date of maximum brightness depends on the phase function for that celestial body. If the phase function was equal to the phase itself, then "maximum brilliancy" would be the same as maximum brightness. Such a phase function would imply that the brightness of a clestial body (when corrected for varying heliocentric and geocentric distances) would be exactly half at half phase, compared to full phase. This isn't valid even for a perfectly diffusing sphere, where the brightness at half phase is exactly pi times fainter than the brightness at full phase. Venus comes pretty close to this. For more rough surfaces, such as the Moon or Mercury, the brightness at half phase is some 10% of the brightness at full phase. So the maximum brightness of Venus occurs somewhat later than 15 July. I haven't computed the precise date, and it really doesn't matter, because Venus' brightness remains nearly constant for several weeks during July. Thus there is definitely no noticeable "peak" in Venus' brightness in July -- the maximum brightness is a very very shallow "peak". -- ---------------------------------------------------------------- Paul Schlyter, Grev Turegatan 40, SE-114 38 Stockholm, SWEDEN e-mail: pausch at stockholm dot bostream dot se WWW: http://www.stjarnhimlen.se/ http://home.tiscali.se/pausch/ |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
SOLAR ACTIVITY WATCH: The Sun has been mostly quiet for weeks, but...
In article ,
Sam Wormley wrote: On July 15th Venus reaches maximum brightness. No, on that date Venus reaches maximum "brilliancy", which is somewhat different. The "brilliancy" is defined in purely geometrical terms: "maximum brilliancy" occurs when the sunlit part of Venus' disk reaches its largest apparent area. The date of maximum brightness depends on the phase function for that celestial body. If the phase function was equal to the phase itself, then "maximum brilliancy" would be the same as maximum brightness. Such a phase function would imply that the brightness of a clestial body (when corrected for varying heliocentric and geocentric distances) would be exactly half at half phase, compared to full phase. This isn't valid even for a perfectly diffusing sphere, where the brightness at half phase is exactly pi times fainter than the brightness at full phase. Venus comes pretty close to this. For more rough surfaces, such as the Moon or Mercury, the brightness at half phase is some 10% of the brightness at full phase. So the maximum brightness of Venus occurs somewhat later than 15 July. I haven't computed the precise date, and it really doesn't matter, because Venus' brightness remains nearly constant for several weeks during July. Thus there is definitely no noticeable "peak" in Venus' brightness in July -- the maximum brightness is a very very shallow "peak". -- ---------------------------------------------------------------- Paul Schlyter, Grev Turegatan 40, SE-114 38 Stockholm, SWEDEN e-mail: pausch at stockholm dot bostream dot se WWW: http://www.stjarnhimlen.se/ http://home.tiscali.se/pausch/ |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
SOLAR ACTIVITY WATCH: The Sun has been mostly quiet for weeks, but...
Paul Schlyter wrote:
No, on that date Venus reaches maximum "brilliancy", which is somewhat different. The "brilliancy" is defined in purely geometrical terms: "maximum brilliancy" occurs when the sunlit part of Venus' disk reaches its largest apparent area. Wrong-oh. Here's the definition of "brilliancy," as stated on page 723 of the _Explanatory Supplement to the Astronomical Almanac_ (1992): brilliancy: for Mercury and Venus the quantity k s^2 / r^2, where k = 0.5 ( 1 + cos i ), i is the phase angle, s is the apparent semidiameter, and r is the heliocentric distance. Notice the 1 / r^2 factor. If "maximum brilliancy" occurs when the sunlit part of the disk reaches largest apparent area -- that is, when k s^2 is maximized -- then why does a 1 / r^2 factor come into play? In other words, what does the planet's heliocentric distance have to do with apparent area after the phase and angular diameter are accounted for? -- ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Mark Gingrich San Leandro, California |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
SOLAR ACTIVITY WATCH: The Sun has been mostly quiet for weeks, but...
Paul Schlyter wrote:
No, on that date Venus reaches maximum "brilliancy", which is somewhat different. The "brilliancy" is defined in purely geometrical terms: "maximum brilliancy" occurs when the sunlit part of Venus' disk reaches its largest apparent area. Wrong-oh. Here's the definition of "brilliancy," as stated on page 723 of the _Explanatory Supplement to the Astronomical Almanac_ (1992): brilliancy: for Mercury and Venus the quantity k s^2 / r^2, where k = 0.5 ( 1 + cos i ), i is the phase angle, s is the apparent semidiameter, and r is the heliocentric distance. Notice the 1 / r^2 factor. If "maximum brilliancy" occurs when the sunlit part of the disk reaches largest apparent area -- that is, when k s^2 is maximized -- then why does a 1 / r^2 factor come into play? In other words, what does the planet's heliocentric distance have to do with apparent area after the phase and angular diameter are accounted for? -- ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Mark Gingrich San Leandro, California |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
PDF (Planetary Distance Formula) explains DW 2004 / Quaoar and Kuiper Belt | hermesnines | Astronomy Misc | 10 | February 27th 04 02:14 AM |
Scientists report first-ever 3-D observations of solar storms usingUlysses spacecraft (Forwarded) | Andrew Yee | Astronomy Misc | 0 | November 17th 03 01:46 AM |
The Mystery of Buzz's Lost (and found?) Moon Watch | wassup | History | 5 | November 2nd 03 03:56 PM |
The Mystery of Buzz's Missing Moon Watch -- Found?? | James Oberg | History | 21 | November 1st 03 12:11 PM |
S&T AstroAlert: Today's flare and potential auroral activity forOct 29/30 | Brian O'Halloran | Amateur Astronomy | 0 | October 28th 03 10:08 PM |