A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Astronomy and Astrophysics » Astronomy Misc
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Man DID NEVER Walk on the Moon...



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old April 9th 06, 06:01 AM posted to sci.astro.amateur,sci.astro,sci.space.history,sci.physics
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Man DID NEVER Walk on the Moon...

You don't understand that you are CROSSPOSTING GARBAGE so go away Please!
(The internet can be your friend, but not if you don't understand the
basics!)

"ATControlr" wrote in message
ups.com...
You're SO full of it that your eyes are brown...............go away -
PLEASE!


Anonymous wrote:
On Fri, 7 Apr 2006, "nytecam" wrote:
..for those who saw it like
http://home...
Nytecam 51N 0.1W
snipped for clarity


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

Yes. "Cat's out o' the bag". Man did NEVER walk on the Moon.
That's because NASA's six allegedly-manned and half-million
miles per round-trip(!) missions to the Moon (1969-72) were
at best unmanned flights in competition with the U.S.S.R.'s
contemporaneous Soviet Luna/Lunakhod unmanned Moon missions.

"They couldn't make it so they faked it." Thus, the "manned"
portions of the missions were actually filmed under the top-
secret, heavily-guarded domed soundstages in the high desert
of Area 51, NV, perhaps around Pine Gap, AUS and maybe other
remote and publicly-inaccessible locations around the world.
__________________________________________________

Flags fluttering in the high-desert breeze, sand
buggies & actors running along in their deflated
monkeysuits-obviously recorded on highspeed film,
conspicuous absence of blast craters, impossibly
silent running under invisible exhaust emissions,
brazenly obvious backdrops that contrast sharply
against the nearby high-desert terrain, etc. etc.
__________________________________________________

&Here it is 2006, and NASA *still* has enough headaches trying
to cope with the challenges (remember the Challenger shuttle?)
of low-earth orbit manned spacecraft. But things were "easier"
generations ago, back in the bygone era of sliderules, hippies
and flower children. Yupp! Back then, the laws of physics were
a lot easier to deal with than they are now and that's obvious.
Our technology was FAR more advanced back then, than it is now. :-D


Obviously...

The Moon is far beyond the reach of manned spacecraft, to wit:


ALTITUDE COMPARISON CHART
SHUTTLE VS. MOON & MANMADE SATELLITES
(not to scale)

x------Moon's mean geocentric distance ~239,000 miles---x
| |
| |
| |
| |
~ ~214,000 MILES ~
~ ^^^ ^^^ ^^^^^ ~
| |
| |
| |
x------High-altitude orbit ~25,000+ miles altitude------x
| |
x------Geostationary orbit ~22,300 miles altitude-------x
| |
| |
~ ~10,000 MILES ~
~ ~
| |
x------Mid-altitude orbit ~12,500 miles altitude--------x
| |
| |
~ ~10,000 MILES ~
~ ~
| |
x------Low-altitude orbit below ~1200 miles altitude----x
x------JPL/NASA Space Shuttle orbit ~300 miles altitude-x
x------Intl. Space Station orbit ~220 miles altitude |
x------Earth's sea level -0- miles altitude-------------x


To give you an idea of the scale involved, if each hard line
break in the chart below equals roughly 10,000 miles, to wit:

x------Moon's mean geocentric distance ~239,000 miles---x
| 230,000 |
| 220,000 |
| 210,000 |
| 200,000 |
| 190,000 |
| 180,000 |
| 170,000 |
| 160,000 |
| 150,000 |
| 140,000 |
| 130,000 |
| 120,000 |
| 110,000 |
| 100,000 |
| 90,000 |
| 80,000 |
| 70,000 |
| 60,000 |
| 50,000 |
| 40,000 |
| 30,000 |
x------Geostationary orbit ~22,300 miles altitude-------x
x------Mid-altitude orbit ~12,500 miles altitude--------x
x------Low-altitude orbit below ~1200 miles altitude----x

Thus the low-earth shuttle orbit would fit somewhere between
the center and baseline of the bottom 'x'--hardly visible at
all at this scale. And yet, that is the HIGHEST altitude any
manned flight has ever successfully sustained for any length
of time! But the "men to the moon" fairytale devotees don't
want to face up to these and other glaring facts in evidence:

*Apollo Moon Missions 1969-1972 Were At Best *Unmanned*:

http://groups.google.com/groups?selm...amesh-frog.org

*Quasi-Uncensored Apollo Moon Hoax Bookmarks:

http://groups.google.com/groups?selm...amesh-frog.org

Enjoy Life!
Daniel Joseph Min
http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?...rch=0x2B1CCFE7

*Download Min's Banned (Freeware) Books:
http://www.2hot2cool.com/11/danieljosephmin/

*Take Min's Spiritual I.Q. Test (how smart are you, really):

http://groups.google.com/groups?selm...ymous.pos ter

*Min's Google-Archived Home Page On The WWW:

http://groups.google.com/groups?selm...ymous.pos ter

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
iQA/AwUBRDbJBZljD7YrHM/nEQJ1DwCgoSuE6FLy00ZRtm5jfnEDnCz3X8EAnizM
zXPGw24u3l2blrkuIlh/lpUN
=nT7K
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----




 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
The Apollo Hoax FAQ (is not spam) :-) Nathan Jones Misc 6 July 29th 04 06:14 AM
Apollo Buzz alDredge UK Astronomy 5 July 28th 04 10:05 AM
The Apollo Hoax FAQ darla Misc 10 July 25th 04 02:57 PM
The apollo faq the inquirer Astronomy Misc 11 April 22nd 04 06:23 AM
significant addition to section 25 of the faq heat UK Astronomy 1 April 15th 04 01:20 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:53 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.