|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Man DID NEVER Walk on the Moon...
You don't understand that you are CROSSPOSTING GARBAGE so go away Please!
(The internet can be your friend, but not if you don't understand the basics!) "ATControlr" wrote in message ups.com... You're SO full of it that your eyes are brown...............go away - PLEASE! Anonymous wrote: On Fri, 7 Apr 2006, "nytecam" wrote: ..for those who saw it like http://home... Nytecam 51N 0.1W snipped for clarity -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Yes. "Cat's out o' the bag". Man did NEVER walk on the Moon. That's because NASA's six allegedly-manned and half-million miles per round-trip(!) missions to the Moon (1969-72) were at best unmanned flights in competition with the U.S.S.R.'s contemporaneous Soviet Luna/Lunakhod unmanned Moon missions. "They couldn't make it so they faked it." Thus, the "manned" portions of the missions were actually filmed under the top- secret, heavily-guarded domed soundstages in the high desert of Area 51, NV, perhaps around Pine Gap, AUS and maybe other remote and publicly-inaccessible locations around the world. __________________________________________________ Flags fluttering in the high-desert breeze, sand buggies & actors running along in their deflated monkeysuits-obviously recorded on highspeed film, conspicuous absence of blast craters, impossibly silent running under invisible exhaust emissions, brazenly obvious backdrops that contrast sharply against the nearby high-desert terrain, etc. etc. __________________________________________________ &Here it is 2006, and NASA *still* has enough headaches trying to cope with the challenges (remember the Challenger shuttle?) of low-earth orbit manned spacecraft. But things were "easier" generations ago, back in the bygone era of sliderules, hippies and flower children. Yupp! Back then, the laws of physics were a lot easier to deal with than they are now and that's obvious. Our technology was FAR more advanced back then, than it is now. :-D Obviously... The Moon is far beyond the reach of manned spacecraft, to wit: ALTITUDE COMPARISON CHART SHUTTLE VS. MOON & MANMADE SATELLITES (not to scale) x------Moon's mean geocentric distance ~239,000 miles---x | | | | | | | | ~ ~214,000 MILES ~ ~ ^^^ ^^^ ^^^^^ ~ | | | | | | x------High-altitude orbit ~25,000+ miles altitude------x | | x------Geostationary orbit ~22,300 miles altitude-------x | | | | ~ ~10,000 MILES ~ ~ ~ | | x------Mid-altitude orbit ~12,500 miles altitude--------x | | | | ~ ~10,000 MILES ~ ~ ~ | | x------Low-altitude orbit below ~1200 miles altitude----x x------JPL/NASA Space Shuttle orbit ~300 miles altitude-x x------Intl. Space Station orbit ~220 miles altitude | x------Earth's sea level -0- miles altitude-------------x To give you an idea of the scale involved, if each hard line break in the chart below equals roughly 10,000 miles, to wit: x------Moon's mean geocentric distance ~239,000 miles---x | 230,000 | | 220,000 | | 210,000 | | 200,000 | | 190,000 | | 180,000 | | 170,000 | | 160,000 | | 150,000 | | 140,000 | | 130,000 | | 120,000 | | 110,000 | | 100,000 | | 90,000 | | 80,000 | | 70,000 | | 60,000 | | 50,000 | | 40,000 | | 30,000 | x------Geostationary orbit ~22,300 miles altitude-------x x------Mid-altitude orbit ~12,500 miles altitude--------x x------Low-altitude orbit below ~1200 miles altitude----x Thus the low-earth shuttle orbit would fit somewhere between the center and baseline of the bottom 'x'--hardly visible at all at this scale. And yet, that is the HIGHEST altitude any manned flight has ever successfully sustained for any length of time! But the "men to the moon" fairytale devotees don't want to face up to these and other glaring facts in evidence: *Apollo Moon Missions 1969-1972 Were At Best *Unmanned*: http://groups.google.com/groups?selm...amesh-frog.org *Quasi-Uncensored Apollo Moon Hoax Bookmarks: http://groups.google.com/groups?selm...amesh-frog.org Enjoy Life! Daniel Joseph Min http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?...rch=0x2B1CCFE7 *Download Min's Banned (Freeware) Books: http://www.2hot2cool.com/11/danieljosephmin/ *Take Min's Spiritual I.Q. Test (how smart are you, really): http://groups.google.com/groups?selm...ymous.pos ter *Min's Google-Archived Home Page On The WWW: http://groups.google.com/groups?selm...ymous.pos ter -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQA/AwUBRDbJBZljD7YrHM/nEQJ1DwCgoSuE6FLy00ZRtm5jfnEDnCz3X8EAnizM zXPGw24u3l2blrkuIlh/lpUN =nT7K -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
The Apollo Hoax FAQ (is not spam) :-) | Nathan Jones | Misc | 6 | July 29th 04 06:14 AM |
Apollo | Buzz alDredge | UK Astronomy | 5 | July 28th 04 10:05 AM |
The Apollo Hoax FAQ | darla | Misc | 10 | July 25th 04 02:57 PM |
The apollo faq | the inquirer | Astronomy Misc | 11 | April 22nd 04 06:23 AM |
significant addition to section 25 of the faq | heat | UK Astronomy | 1 | April 15th 04 01:20 AM |