#1
|
|||
|
|||
Modeling required
The presentation of a traveling axis which stretches through the
center of the Earth from Arctic to Antarctic circles can be set up like the normal arrangement of longitudes associated with daily rotation however there are no variations in latitudinal speeds to consider as this cycle to the central Sun is an extension and attribute of the orbital motion. I do not see why a person with graphical talents cannot create the necessary product before overlaying daily rotational meridians on orbital meridians and it is almost certain that many things which are locked out by the dismal addiction to right ascension. The Equatorial ring of Uranus acts like a natural orbital meridian with the traveling axis running in a line roughly from Equator to Equator so that the ring turns through 360 degrees in over 8 decades,the fact that readers can actually see it turning to the central Sun should provide enough support for the first creative individual skilled in graphics to present the Earth's equivalent orbital axis with a meridian or meridians attached - http://astro.berkeley.edu/~imke/Infr..._2001_2005.jpg While the daily rotational coordinates on Uranus are about 90 degrees off the traveling orbital axis,the Earth's is 23 1/2 degrees so that really the polar coordinates represent a planet's orbital characteristics in its purest state,hence in the absence of daily rotation,all locations on Earth would experience a single daylight/ darkness cycle. Why the opposition to an additional orbital feature which is crucial to explain the seasons and variations in natural noon when allied with daily rotation ?. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Modeling required
On Sep 6, 8:51*pm, oriel36 wrote:
The presentation of a traveling axis which stretches through the center of the Earth from Arctic to Antarctic circles can be set up like the normal arrangement of longitudes associated with daily rotation however there are no variations in latitudinal speeds to consider as this cycle to the central Sun is an extension and attribute of the orbital motion. I do not see why a person with graphical talents cannot create the necessary product before overlaying daily rotational meridians on orbital meridians and it is almost certain that many things which are locked out by the dismal addiction to right ascension. The Equatorial ring of Uranus acts like a natural orbital meridian with the traveling axis running in a line roughly from Equator to Equator so that the ring turns through 360 degrees in over 8 decades,the fact that readers can actually see it turning to the central Sun should provide enough support for the first creative individual skilled in graphics to present the Earth's equivalent orbital axis with a meridian or meridians attached - http://astro.berkeley.edu/~imke/Infr..._2001_2005.jpg While the daily rotational coordinates on Uranus are about 90 degrees off the traveling orbital axis,the Earth's is 23 1/2 degrees so that really the polar coordinates represent a planet's orbital characteristics in its purest state,hence in the absence of daily rotation,all locations on Earth would experience a single daylight/ darkness cycle. Why the opposition to an additional orbital feature which is crucial to explain the seasons and variations in natural noon when allied with daily rotation ?. The natural orbital meridian formed by the Equatorial ring of Uranus is incredibly productive for multiple reasons and especially in the time lapse footage of Hubble - http://hubblesite.org/newscenter/arc...99/11/video/b/ The South/North component of daily rotation and the wobble of the equatorial rings and the East/West orbital component demonstrate that a planet has a single daylight/darkness cycle originating solely from the orbital behavior of the planet as a reflection of all planets. Is humanity served by being forced to believe that humans have control over global temperatures when some of the most basic facts have to be addressed such as the historical recovery of the proportion of rotations per circuit and the technical details which modify the explanation for the seasons using an additional orbital component,the former deals with daily temperature fluctuations while the latter deals with latitudinal fluctuations as a signature of the orbital motion of the Earth ?. Without Uranus it would be exceptionally difficult to carry the points yet the time lapse imaging clearly shows how the null rotational points (North/South rotational poles) swing around in a cycle just as on Earth the planet turns the North/South poles through the circle of illumination in less than two weeks about a traveling axis stretching through the center of the Earth from Arctic to Antarctic circles just as the traveling axis of Uranus is located close to the planet's equator. Time to come out of the cold guys. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Modeling required
"oriel36" wrote in message ... The natural orbital meridian formed by the Equatorial ring of Uranus is incredibly productive for multiple reasons and especially in the time lapse footage of Hubble - http://hubblesite.org/newscenter/arc...99/11/video/b/ The South/North component of daily rotation and the wobble of the equatorial rings and the East/West orbital component demonstrate that a planet has a single daylight/darkness cycle originating solely from the orbital behavior of the planet as a reflection of all planets. Is humanity ========================================== Humanity is not related to astronomy, you have the wrong newsgroup. Shut the **** up. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Modeling required
One of the most appealing consequences of introducing an additional
orbital component that is easily understood from the perspective of the polar daylight/darkness cycle is having a look at our neighboring planet Venus - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:VenusAnimation.ogg The Earth has a 26 mile spherical deviation between its equatorial and polar diameters while Venus has none and simultaneously, the Earth has the motion and evolution of the fractured surface crust while Venus has only volcanism but no tectonic activity even allowing for different surface compositions and so on.The idea here is that spherical deviation and tectonic activity is bound by a common rotational mechanism where there is an uneven rotational gradient in the viscous composition beneath the planetary crust or differential rotation as astronomers would know it. The separate issue is then isolating what belongs to the daily rotational characteristics of Venus and what belongs to its orbital component and that is very intricate but again,Uranus is a template to bounce comparisons off for the East/West orbital cycle of Uranus is the same as its orbital period of 84 years - http://astro.berkeley.edu/~imke/Infr..._2001_2005.jpg Sooner or later genuine scientists are going to run into the cause of the spherical deviation of our planet and that means accurate figures for rotation through 360 degrees,as differential rotation and fluid dynamics require an uneven rotational gradient between equator and poles as opposed to the surface crust which has an even rotational gradient flexibility in these matters is paramount.Instead of trying to justify right ascension and the terminology of the imaginary difference between the solar day and the sidereal day,a more decisive investigator would be looking at the differences between the rotation of the viscous composition and the rotation of the fractured crust,at least for geological purposes giving astronomy a more dynamic and active edge. This not a digression from the central topic but rather an expansion of it as an example where you can go with these things,what paid geologists and astronomers do with their days is their own business but this is what I do with mine. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Modeling required
On Sep 9, 7:53*am, oriel36 wrote:
what astronomers do with their days is their own business but this is what I do with mine. Those who cower their whole lives on their knees will never see the sky. Fear of the unknown is reserved for those who spend their entire lives with their backsides raised to their false god's dismissive, downward glance. How can he tell you apart? Those who walk tall and straight can clearly see mankind's true destiny and the defeated lessons of the past. Without the least hindrance from even a billion-strong army of raised backsides, of those still bent double in self-loathing and fear of the sky falling. Sheep will often avoid invisible hurdles. Is this why you call your false prophet a "shepherd?" Would your imaginary god not prefer that you see his great works from the raised viewpoint of an upright man? Rather than that of a domesticated, four-legged animal. With blinkered eyes rolled constantly upwards into the terrifying, man-made darkness. In tormented expectation of his merciless wrath. Why are you so afraid of the dark? |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Modeling required
I must assume that many readers have found themselves no longer able
to support a state of mind which is counter-productive to their own existence and the surrounding community without actually finding their true bearings and although I have gone to great lengths to maintain a level of discussion which avoids the temptation to reach for weaknesses in the thinking processes of an individual or a community,even I have to concede that such an avoidance is temporarily unreasonable in itself.The reader may not sense dismay at such a concession insofar as turning from the technical issues which are dealt with geometrically and dynamically to a mindset built on intellectual forensics creates an atmosphere of more of the same whereas the technical arguments are meant to spur further developments as opposed to being a platform to attack individuals or a community. After reading the experiences of others,I came to a decision a long time ago to approach readers here as though they are not unfeeling and although their mental machinery may be stuck or latent,there is always the chance of 'snapping out'* as they shift from a lower to a higher level of thinking and feeling and into the arena where 'methods' are not so important,as individuals trust themselves and each other to maintain balances and rules.I do not disdains rules,in fact the original rules for astronomical methods and insights are many magnitudes stricter than the casual observer would imagine ,not just for the purpose of restraining individuals from taking shortcuts and loopholes when proposing schemes,solutions and conclusions but allowing the genuine investigator to pursue his talent in a spirit of adventure.Drawing partly from my heritage of the Brehon laws that those in authority must be responsible for the decisions they make,for good and for bad,and this is absent from all contemporary judgments such as climate science,planetary definitions and the multiple issues brought up here over the years,it is not the law of precedence that counts but that of conceptual evolution the ability to change what needs to be changed in order to discover new territory rather than build defenses to protect the old or 'falsification' as empiricist call it. * "One puzzle of snapping that the deprogramming process illuminates is the enormous amount of mental activity that takes place in the unthinking, unfeeling state many cult members are drawn into. Ironically, most people we spoke with fought desperately to preserve their blissed-out states, although they often were saturated with fear, guilt, hatred and exhaustion. In the beginning this seemed to present a disturbing contradiction: How could an individual whose mind has apparently been shut off, who has been robbed of his freedom of thought, display such cunning and initiative? What the deprogramming process demonstrated is that cult members do not simply snap from a normal conscious state into one of complete unconsciousness (and vice versa during deprogramming). Rather, most pass from one frame of waking awareness into a second, entirely separate, frame of awareness in which they may be equally active and perceptive." Cult deprogramming commentary |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Modeling required
"oriel36" wrote in message ... |I must assume That's why you'll never understand anything, ****head. Never assume anything. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Modeling required
On Sep 10, 5:08*am, oriel36 wrote:
I must assume that many readers have found themselves no longer able to support a state of mind which is counter-productive to their own existence and the surrounding community without actually finding their true bearings and although I have gone to great lengths to maintain a level of discussion which avoids the temptation to reach for weaknesses in the thinking processes of an individual or a community,even I have to concede that such an avoidance is temporarily unreasonable in itself. I thank you for being politie to us. After reading the experiences of others,I came to a decision a long time ago to approach readers here as though they are not unfeeling and although their mental machinery may be stuck or latent,there is always the chance of 'snapping out'* as they shift from a lower to a higher level of *thinking and feeling and *into the arena where 'methods' are not so important,as individuals trust themselves and each other to maintain balances and rules. Empirical reasoning and the scientific method let people check one another's conclusions, instead of people just having to sit back and admire the conclusions of the person who convinces everyone else that he has the best intuition and insight. There's a _reason_ why mathematics versus intuition has caught on in science like wildfire. We're not programmed cult members, because the merits of today's science are something that a person can *see for himself* if he can achieve a basic level of mathematical competence. Yes, perhaps the few who cannot do that are stuck with having to respect authority, but even there, at least they have the technological fruits of science to give them some confidence in which authorities know what they're talking about. John Savard |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Modeling required
On Sep 9, 6:45*am, "Chris.B" wrote:
Sheep will often avoid invisible hurdles. Is this why you call your false prophet a "shepherd?" Would your imaginary god not prefer that you see his great works from the raised viewpoint of an upright man? The parable of the Good Shepherd and similar things appear in the Bible because they have a dry climate in the Middle East, making it a good place to raise sheep. Along with cattle. At least the Jewish religion must also be a religion of peace, because it prevented range wars from breaking out between the Jews who raised cattle and the Jews who raised sheep. John Savard |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Modeling required
On Sep 10, 10:03*pm, Quadibloc wrote:
The parable of the Good Shepherd and similar things appear in the Bible because they have a dry climate in the Middle East, making it a good place to raise sheep. Along with cattle. At least the Jewish religion must also be a religion of peace, because it prevented range wars from breaking out between the Jews who raised cattle and the Jews who raised sheep. John Savard Wales is as wet as it gets and they have far more sheep than people and quite a lot of cattle. No range wars but there are a lot Range Rovers. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Antecedent for climate modeling | oriel36[_2_] | Amateur Astronomy | 43 | February 3rd 11 07:00 AM |
Modeling the Big Dipper, Griffith Obs, and Mt. Wilson | Watty | Amateur Astronomy | 4 | October 7th 08 07:37 AM |
Any Celestial Mechanics Modeling Sites? | Bret Cahill | Astronomy Misc | 3 | June 9th 05 09:38 AM |
Any Vis Viva Modeling Pages? | Bret Cahill | UK Astronomy | 0 | June 6th 05 10:02 PM |
modeling the Si-based life | Amirsaman | Misc | 4 | March 10th 04 05:38 PM |