A PROOF THAT PHYSICS IS DEAD

Einsteiniana's high priests have all left the sinking ship and are now trying to unbrainwash the scientific community:

http://www.noozhawk.com/article/ucsb...0#.UqeoYxWexjo
"Could Einstein's theory of relativity be wrong? That's among the burning questions being asked by theoretical physicists today. It's a startling claim and one that has received a lot of attention from other scientists. Researchers from UC Santa Barbara's Department of Physics and the Kavli Institute for Theretical Physics (KITP) have received a $1.32 million grant from the National Science Foundation to continue their work on finding an answer."

http://www.amazon.com/What-Einstein-.../dp/1782400451
What If Einstein Was Wrong? Brian Clegg, Jim Al-Khalili: "It shouldn't be too much of a surprise that Einstein could get it wrong, because science is not about absolute truth..."

http://www.newscientist.com/article/...t-is-time.html
New Scientist: "ADVANCES in physics often result from observations that don't fit theory: the Michelson-Morley experiment, for example, saw no universal ether, paving the way for Einstein's relativity. That successful theory is itself hard to square with one of the most universal observations of all. Relativity, and many subsequent physical theories, kill off the notion that time flows - but every human alive will argue otherwise. Well, almost every human: some physicists are resigned to the "block universe", with its static time. Others, however, feel that any theory that doesn't accommodate our experience must be flawed..."

http://www.newscientist.com/article/...d-it-back.html
New Scientist: "Saving time: Physics killed it. Do we need it back?"

http://www.newscientist.com/special/challenging-einstein?cmpid=RSS|NSNS|2012-GLOBAL|online-news
New Scientist: "Sorry, Albert: Physics that challenges Einstein. Gravity, relativity, space and time - Albert Einstein explained all these and more. But he had an uneasy relationship with quantum theory, and with physicists still casting around for a unifying theory of physics, his ideas in all areas are under scrutiny like never before. If we want to progress towards a theory of everything, we need to understand how space and time fit together - if they do at all."

http://www.newscientist.com/article/...erse-tick.html
"...says John Norton, a philosopher based at the University of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. Norton is hesitant to express it, but his instinct - and the consensus in physics - seems to be that space and time exist on their own. The trouble with this idea, though, is that it doesn't sit well with relativity, which describes space-time as a malleable fabric whose geometry can be changed by the gravity of stars, planets and matter."

The scientific community couldn't care less. Whether or not space and time form "a malleable fabric whose geometry can be changed by the gravity of stars, planets and matter" is of absolutely no importance to anybody - science is dead anyway.

Pentcho Valev