|
|
|||||||
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
June 29th 18, 09:22 PM
posted to alt.astronomy
|
|||
|
|||
Objects Move faster than Light all the time...
....like rogue planets blown away by a supernova...but we do not observe them
doing so because their light is still moving at light speed... 
|
|
#2
June 30th 18, 02:23 AM
posted to alt.astronomy
|
|||
|
|||
|
Objects Move faster than Light all the time...
On Friday, June 29, 2018 at 1:22:21 PM UTC-7, Mark Earnest wrote:
...like rogue planets blown away by a supernova...but we do not observe them doing so because their light is still moving at light speed... Yet another bizarre claim from you without offering a shred of proof. Nothing with mass can ever attain the speed of light under any circumstances. Read this... http://curious.astro.cornell.edu/abo...t-intermediate Do you think you know more than a postdoctoral astrophysics researcher at Cornell?
|
|
#3
June 30th 18, 10:23 AM
posted to alt.astronomy
|
|||
|
|||
|
Objects Move faster than Light all the time...
On Friday, June 29, 2018 at 8:23:24 PM UTC-5, palsing wrote:
On Friday, June 29, 2018 at 1:22:21 PM UTC-7, Mark Earnest wrote: ...like rogue planets blown away by a supernova...but we do not observe them doing so because their light is still moving at light speed... Yet another bizarre claim from you without offering a shred of proof. What's the use? Atheists would not know proof if it burned a hole in their pants. The dictionary is not proof for you. That is why you stay ignorant and stupid. Nothing with mass can ever attain the speed of light under any circumstances. Read this... http://curious.astro.cornell.edu/abo...t-intermediate Do you think you know more than a postdoctoral astrophysics researcher at Cornell? Today's scientists know nothing. They live in the dark ages.
|
|
#4
June 30th 18, 11:29 AM
posted to alt.astronomy
|
|||
|
|||
|
Objects Move faster than Light all the time...
Nothing with mass can ever attain the speed of light under any circumstances. Read this... http://curious.astro.cornell.edu/abo...t-intermediate Do you think you know more than a postdoctoral astrophysics researcher at Cornell? Today's scientists know nothing. They know a hell of a lot more than fools like you and other theists.
|
|
#5
June 30th 18, 12:19 PM
posted to alt.astronomy
|
|||
|
|||
|
Objects Move faster than Light all the time...
On Saturday, June 30, 2018 at 5:29:22 AM UTC-5, casagi... wrote:
Nothing with mass can ever attain the speed of light under any circumstances. Read this... http://curious.astro.cornell.edu/abo...t-intermediate Do you think you know more than a postdoctoral astrophysics researcher at Cornell? Today's scientists know nothing. They know a hell of a lot more than fools like you and other theists. No most of them are atheists like you who do not know what a fact is. They admit that to us all when they say there are no absolutes.
|
|
#6
June 30th 18, 06:59 PM
posted to alt.astronomy
|
|||
|
|||
|
Objects Move faster than Light all the time...
They know a hell of a lot more than fools like you and other theists. No most of them are atheists like you who do not know what a fact is. Most may be atheists because they're rational. They admit that to us all when they say there are no absolutes. That is simply not true. e.g. of 2 absolutes : I think, therefore I am. There is no God.
|
|
#7
June 30th 18, 07:04 PM
posted to alt.astronomy
|
|||
|
|||
|
Objects Move faster than Light all the time...
On Saturday, June 30, 2018 at 12:59:01 PM UTC-5, casagi... wrote:
They know a hell of a lot more than fools like you and other theists. No most of them are atheists like you who do not know what a fact is. Most may be atheists because they're rational. They admit that to us all when they say there are no absolutes. That is simply not true. e.g. of 2 absolutes : I think, therefore I am. There is no God. Well at least you are making progress. You know there are absolutes. That means you are on the way to real actual facts. Whether there is a God or not is up for debate.
|
|
#8
June 30th 18, 08:16 PM
posted to alt.astronomy
|
|||
|
|||
|
Objects Move faster than Light all the time...
On Saturday, June 30, 2018 at 11:04:05 AM UTC-7, Mark Earnest wrote:
On Saturday, June 30, 2018 at 12:59:01 PM UTC-5, casagi... wrote: They know a hell of a lot more than fools like you and other theists. No most of them are atheists like you who do not know what a fact is. Most may be atheists because they're rational. They admit that to us all when they say there are no absolutes. That is simply not true. e.g. of 2 absolutes : I think, therefore I am. There is no God. Well at least you are making progress. You know there are absolutes. That means you are on the way to real actual facts. Whether there is a God or not is up for debate. Not even an electron going through space can ever reach c Close but no sigarsBert
|
|
#9
June 30th 18, 08:31 PM
posted to alt.astronomy
|
|||
|
|||
|
Objects Move faster than Light all the time...
On Saturday, June 30, 2018 at 2:16:18 PM UTC-5, Herbert Glazier wrote:
On Saturday, June 30, 2018 at 11:04:05 AM UTC-7, Mark Earnest wrote: On Saturday, June 30, 2018 at 12:59:01 PM UTC-5, casagi... wrote: They know a hell of a lot more than fools like you and other theists. No most of them are atheists like you who do not know what a fact is. Most may be atheists because they're rational. They admit that to us all when they say there are no absolutes. That is simply not true. e.g. of 2 absolutes : I think, therefore I am. There is no God. Well at least you are making progress. You know there are absolutes. That means you are on the way to real actual facts. Whether there is a God or not is up for debate. Not even an electron going through space can ever reach c Close but no sigarsBert The scientists that taught you this also say there are no absolutes Bert.
|
|
#10
July 1st 18, 04:41 AM
posted to alt.astronomy
|
|||
|
|||
|
Objects Move faster than Light all the time...
On Saturday, June 30, 2018 at 2:23:56 AM UTC-7, Mark Earnest wrote:
On Friday, June 29, 2018 at 8:23:24 PM UTC-5, palsing wrote: On Friday, June 29, 2018 at 1:22:21 PM UTC-7, Mark Earnest wrote: ...like rogue planets blown away by a supernova...but we do not observe them doing so because their light is still moving at light speed... Yet another bizarre claim from you without offering a shred of proof. What's the use? Atheists would not know proof if it burned a hole in their pants. The dictionary is not proof for you. That is why you stay ignorant and stupid. Nothing with mass can ever attain the speed of light under any circumstances. Read this... http://curious.astro.cornell.edu/abo...t-intermediate Do you think you know more than a postdoctoral astrophysics researcher at Cornell? Today's scientists know nothing. They live in the dark ages. No matter what you think, objects with mass cannot ever attain the speed of light. If you can show otherwise you will win a Nobel Prize. Go for it... but you cannot, no chance in hell.
|
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| IF NEUTRINOS CANNOT MOVE FASTER THAN LIGHT | Pentcho Valev | Astronomy Misc | 4 | September 28th 11 02:39 PM |
| Can a 'shadow' move faster than light? | nytecam | Amateur Astronomy | 17 | November 14th 05 06:23 PM |
| What objects move fast across field of view? | Alien | Amateur Astronomy | 17 | October 26th 05 07:07 PM |
| Who needs a time machine "information travels faster than time" | timothy liverance | Policy | 3 | May 18th 04 11:02 PM |
| Who needs a time machine "information travels faster than time" | timothy liverance | Space Station | 0 | May 18th 04 09:32 PM |
Linear Mode
