Follow the Current - WAS: Apollo One, the FBI, and Scott Grissom

After discussing this at length with Steve Clemmons and with no followup by
Scott of any empirical tests, I am inclined to believe this scenario, though
interesting, may not be strictly correct.
Too many problems existed with Apollo to be able to isolate this. Also,
none of the earlier tests, including the altitude chamber test weeks
earlier showed any such anomally.
The environmental system had been replaced on Jan 26, after the all up test
with Wally. start looking there.
Bill
"rk" wrote in message
...
LaDonna Wyss wrote:

"Folderol?" My, aren't we prim! Good thing I studied English in
college. :-) The legal standard is beyond a REASONABLE doubt, and
yes it has. The RCS A/C roll switch was hard shorted to ground, and
that short caused multiple problems all along Main B from the moment
Apollo One was powered up at 9:45 that morning. I've tracked the
electrical problems as well as the other so-called "anomalies" that
occurred that day, and they all tie directly to that short.
And, as for the piece of metal, you do understand the concept of a
hard short (aka "dead" short)?


Question rk1: What was the current through the "hard short?"

Question rk2: What upstream impedance limited the current?

Question rk3: What gauge wire was used to the switch?


--
rk, Just an OldEngineer
"Dealing properly with very rare events is one of the attributes that
distinguishes a design that is fit for safety-critical systems from one
that
is not." -- John Rushby in "A Comparison of Bus Architectures for Safety-
Critical Embedded Systems," March 2003




-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =-----

"William Gratchic" wrote in message ...

Question rk1: What was the current through the "hard short?"

Question rk2: What upstream impedance limited the current?

Question rk3: What gauge wire was used to the switch?


--
rk, Just an OldEngineer
"Dealing properly with very rare events is one of the attributes that
distinguishes a design that is fit for safety-critical systems from one
that
is not." -- John Rushby in "A Comparison of Bus Architectures for Safety-
Critical Embedded Systems," March 2003



rk, old engineers use to be able to figure those things out.

On 9 Jun 2004 05:50:25 -0700, (Scott Grissom)
wrote:

rk, old engineers use to be able to figure those things out.

....Yeah, but LaDouchebag claims to have all of these facts and figures
and documentation she got from you, she should be able to answer these
questions. But she won't, because she's your current sexual tension
release point, and she's going to foist your bull**** on everyone in
order to keep getting whatever form of erotic abuse you and your pet
gerbils wish to inflict upon her.

....Top of my wish lists is that I'm at the Pearly Gates when you
arrive, just so I get to see Gus waiting there to beat the unliving
**** out of you and your psychotic excuse for a mother for all the
grief you've caused us and for ****ing all over his name, as well as
Ed & Roger's.

And second on that list is to be allowed to send back pictures for the
group...

OM

--

"No ******* ever won a war by dying for | http://www.io.com/~o_m
his country. He won it by making the other | Sergeant-At-Arms
poor dumb ******* die for his country." | Human O-Ring Society

- General George S. Patton, Jr

OM om@our_blessed_lady_mary_of_the_holy_NASA_researc h_facility.org wrote in message . ..
On 9 Jun 2004 05:50:25 -0700, (Scott Grissom)
wrote:

rk, old engineers use to be able to figure those things out.

...Yeah, but LaDouchebag claims to have all of these facts and figures
and documentation she got from you, she should be able to answer these
questions. But she won't, because she's your current sexual tension
release point, and she's going to foist your bull**** on everyone in
order to keep getting whatever form of erotic abuse you and your pet
gerbils wish to inflict upon her.

...Top of my wish lists is that I'm at the Pearly Gates when you
arrive, just so I get to see Gus waiting there to beat the unliving
**** out of you and your psychotic excuse for a mother for all the
grief you've caused us and for ****ing all over his name, as well as
Ed & Roger's.

And second on that list is to be allowed to send back pictures for the
group...

OM

I NEVER claimed to have gotten any information from Scott. Mr.
Psychology Degree, would you please stick to facts or defect to China?

"LaDonna Wyss" wrote in message
om...
I NEVER claimed to have gotten any information from Scott.

Strange, you said you'd read the autopsy report, and insisted that it wasn't
public information.

From whom did you obtain a copy to read, if not "scott" or his mommie?

"Scott Hedrick" wrote in message . ..
"LaDonna Wyss" wrote in message
om...
I NEVER claimed to have gotten any information from Scott.

Strange, you said you'd read the autopsy report, and insisted that it wasn't
public information.

From whom did you obtain a copy to read, if not "scott" or his mommie?

Oh good grief you are thick. I told everyone in here where I got it.
And it ISN'T public information. In fact, I believe Scott has said
the same thing in one of the umpteen threads on the issue.
I read it at Betty's home.

In article ,
(LaDonna Wyss) wrote:

"Scott Hedrick" wrote in message
. ..
"LaDonna Wyss" wrote in message
om...
I NEVER claimed to have gotten any information from Scott.

Strange, you said you'd read the autopsy report, and insisted that it
wasn't
public information.

From whom did you obtain a copy to read, if not "scott" or his mommie?

Oh good grief you are thick. I told everyone in here where I got it.
And it ISN'T public information. In fact, I believe Scott has said
the same thing in one of the umpteen threads on the issue.
I read it at Betty's home.

And yet, as an "investigator," with "team mates" and everything, by your
own admission you did not take notes.

--
Herb Schaltegger, B.S., J.D.
Reformed Aerospace Engineer
Columbia Loss FAQ:
http://www.io.com/~o_m/columbia_loss_faq_x.html

"LaDonna Wyss" wrote in message
om...
"Scott Hedrick" wrote in message
. ..
"LaDonna Wyss" wrote in message
om...
I NEVER claimed to have gotten any information from Scott.

Strange, you said you'd read the autopsy report, and insisted that it
wasn't
public information.

From whom did you obtain a copy to read, if not "scott" or his mommie?

I read it at Betty's home.

So, you didn't get it from "scott", but his mommie. You tortured that poor
woman by reading the gory details of how her husband died and his body was
dissected in front of her instead of asking to read it at your home in
private, AND you compound that by failing to take notes, forcing you to have
to call her back every time your investigation raises a question.

You keep reminding her of her husband's death, AND you share the bed with
her son/lover. What did Betty do to you to deserve that kind of treatment?

Herb Schaltegger wrote in message ...
In article ,
(LaDonna Wyss) wrote:

"Scott Hedrick" wrote in message
. ..
"LaDonna Wyss" wrote in message
om...
I NEVER claimed to have gotten any information from Scott.

Strange, you said you'd read the autopsy report, and insisted that it
wasn't
public information.

From whom did you obtain a copy to read, if not "scott" or his mommie?

Oh good grief you are thick. I told everyone in here where I got it.
And it ISN'T public information. In fact, I believe Scott has said
the same thing in one of the umpteen threads on the issue.
I read it at Betty's home.

And yet, as an "investigator," with "team mates" and everything, by your
own admission you did not take notes.

You're damned straight I didn't take notes. Would you? Are you that
cold and calloused? I'm NOT going to sit in front of Gus' widow and
make notes like I'm writing a term paper. That was HER HUSBAND'S
INTENSELY PRIVATE INFORMATION. Have you NO respect???

(LaDonna Wyss) wrote:
You're damned straight I didn't take notes. Would you? Are you that
cold and calloused? I'm NOT going to sit in front of Gus' widow and
make notes like I'm writing a term paper.

That's just the point LaDonna - You *are*, in effect, writing a term
paper by conducting your semi-formal investigation. Now while writing
notes in front of her would be massively tasteless, writing them
immediately after when you had left the house would have been
appropriate.

The hallmark of the serious investigator is documentation to the
maximum extent practical. When you present your case to media or to
the legal authorities thats what they are going to want to see,
anything less is regarded as the work of the crank.

D.
--
Touch-twice life. Eat. Drink. Laugh.