A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Astronomy and Astrophysics » Amateur Astronomy
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

RA/Dec modelling as a systemic failure

Thread Tools Display Modes
Old November 7th 17, 07:53 AM posted to sci.astro.amateur
Gerald Kelleher
external usenet poster
Posts: 1,123
Default RA/Dec modelling as a systemic failure

The issue of ‘climate change’ where speculative predictions are presented as facts using computer modelling began with the modelling of planetary motions using accurate clocks in the late 17th century or the ‘clockwork solar system’ as it became known. This clockwork system is based on a rotating celestial sphere and looks like this -


You can describe the location of any celestial object such as the Sun, moon and planets pasted on to this spherical framework as they move relative to each other which is why it is so good for predicting the time and dates of astronomical events like transits, lunar/solar eclipses and so on. All current software programs such as Stellarium are based on this calendar based framework.

The problem is that it is totally useless for modelling the motions of the Earth as it tries to bypass cause and effect. The weekday is anchored in the return of the Sun to noon along with the day/night cycle as the planet turns daily but the Royal Society guys in the late 17th century tried to bypass the Sun and appeal to rotation of the stars around Polaris directly and eventually this has become RA/Dec. The ancestors of the flawed clockwork modelling are now wrecking havoc with planetary climate by rigging observations to suit their computer modelling agenda by conveniently morphing the success of short term weather modelling into ‘climate’.
Old November 7th 17, 04:59 PM posted to sci.astro.amateur
Gerald Kelleher
external usenet poster
Posts: 1,123
Default RA/Dec modelling as a systemic failure

The problem is not ‘climate change’, the problem is a human systemic one founded on artificial modelling whether with a clock or a computer. The clockwork solar system puts all observations of motions into a rotating celestial sphere so you can describe the Sun’s location to the celestial sphere just the same as you would the planets or the moon as the right ascension/declination modelling doesn’t discriminate what is moving around what, all it does is accurately relate the position of one object to another.


With the arrival of software based on this celestial sphere, the physical descriptions have followed suit so things like the Equinox are now described as the ‘Sun moves South of the celestial equator’ leading to horrifying conclusions by NASA such as a pivoting circle of illumination off the Equator -

The agenda of ‘climate change’ is really a symptom of systemic failure where observations are rigged to suit modelling just as the late 17th century system was rigged thereby destroying the ability to work with the motions of the Earth for cause and effect.

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
On Security (systemic causes) Patrick Meuser-Bianca SETI 0 February 18th 08 04:29 PM
Systemic Klaatu Amateur Astronomy 0 October 2nd 06 06:44 PM
Systemic Klaatu SETI 0 October 2nd 06 06:42 PM
Modelling surface temperatures on Mars Ryan Pavlick Research 0 February 4th 04 12:27 AM
Modelling a BeanStalk Ian Woollard Policy 3 August 27th 03 01:01 AM

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:46 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2018, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright 2004-2018 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.