A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Astronomy and Astrophysics » Amateur Astronomy
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Ozone layer recovery could be delayed by 30 years



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old October 26th 17, 09:36 AM posted to sci.astro.amateur
RichA[_6_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 731
Default Ozone layer recovery could be delayed by 30 years

On Tuesday, 24 October 2017 00:24:41 UTC-4, Gutless Umbrella Carrying Sissy wrote:
RichA wrote in
:

On Sunday, October 22, 2017 at 3:08:48 PM UTC-4, Gutless
Umbrella Carrying Sissy wrote:
RichA wrote in
:

On Thursday, 12 October 2017 21:10:24 UTC-4, StarDust wrote:
http://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-41585552

I thought, this problem is solved?

It's over the Antarctic, so who cares? Deranged greenies
going to fret over penguins getting skin cancer?

At the height of the scare, the absolute *worst* case
prediction of the destruction of the ozone laywer was an
increase in UV radiation that was the equivalent of moving from
Norway to the Mediterranean coast.

--


The same chicken-little kooks who wrote that have a ZERO
prediction accuracy rate over the last 50 years. Like oil
running out, mass starvation by 1980, etc. Shouldn't let
anthropologists and sociologists with degrees from left-wing,
second-tier universities dictate policies.

They've done very well at the only prediction that really matters:

"If I scare people with this fake prediction, I'll sell a lot of
copies of my book. And since nothing bad will happen, next year, I
can write another book and do it all again."


The bookshelves are weighted-down with quackery and ideas aimed at mediocre minds and worse, horribly gullible people.

Ads
  #12  
Old October 26th 17, 08:58 PM posted to sci.astro.amateur
Gutless Umbrella Carrying Sissy[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 117
Default Ozone layer recovery could be delayed by 30 years

RichA wrote in
:

On Tuesday, 24 October 2017 00:24:41 UTC-4, Gutless Umbrella
Carrying Sissy wrote:
RichA wrote in
:

On Sunday, October 22, 2017 at 3:08:48 PM UTC-4, Gutless
Umbrella Carrying Sissy wrote:
RichA wrote in
:

On Thursday, 12 October 2017 21:10:24 UTC-4, StarDust
wrote:
http://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-41585552

I thought, this problem is solved?

It's over the Antarctic, so who cares? Deranged greenies
going to fret over penguins getting skin cancer?

At the height of the scare, the absolute *worst* case
prediction of the destruction of the ozone laywer was an
increase in UV radiation that was the equivalent of moving
from Norway to the Mediterranean coast.

--

The same chicken-little kooks who wrote that have a ZERO
prediction accuracy rate over the last 50 years. Like oil
running out, mass starvation by 1980, etc. Shouldn't let
anthropologists and sociologists with degrees from left-wing,
second-tier universities dictate policies.

They've done very well at the only prediction that really
matters:

"If I scare people with this fake prediction, I'll sell a lot
of copies of my book. And since nothing bad will happen, next
year, I can write another book and do it all again."


The bookshelves are weighted-down with quackery and ideas aimed
at mediocre minds and worse, horribly gullible people.

That is because there are a *lot* of such people around.

--
Terry Austin

Vacation photos from Iceland:
https://plus.google.com/u/0/collection/QaXQkB

"Terry Austin: like the polio vaccine, only with more asshole."
-- David Bilek

Jesus forgives sinners, not criminals.

  #13  
Old October 26th 17, 10:08 PM posted to sci.astro.amateur
Mike Collins[_4_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,727
Default Ozone layer recovery could be delayed by 30 years

RichA wrote:
On Tuesday, 24 October 2017 00:24:41 UTC-4, Gutless Umbrella Carrying Sissy wrote:
RichA wrote in
:

On Sunday, October 22, 2017 at 3:08:48 PM UTC-4, Gutless
Umbrella Carrying Sissy wrote:
RichA wrote in
:

On Thursday, 12 October 2017 21:10:24 UTC-4, StarDust wrote:
http://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-41585552

I thought, this problem is solved?

It's over the Antarctic, so who cares? Deranged greenies
going to fret over penguins getting skin cancer?

At the height of the scare, the absolute *worst* case
prediction of the destruction of the ozone laywer was an
increase in UV radiation that was the equivalent of moving from
Norway to the Mediterranean coast.

--

The same chicken-little kooks who wrote that have a ZERO
prediction accuracy rate over the last 50 years. Like oil
running out, mass starvation by 1980, etc. Shouldn't let
anthropologists and sociologists with degrees from left-wing,
second-tier universities dictate policies.

They've done very well at the only prediction that really matters:

"If I scare people with this fake prediction, I'll sell a lot of
copies of my book. And since nothing bad will happen, next year, I
can write another book and do it all again."


The bookshelves are weighted-down with quackery and ideas aimed at
mediocre minds and worse, horribly gullible people.



Your anti science ignorance is startling.
The ozone hole in the Antarctic has had measurable effects on health
including cancer.
If you lived in Australia, New Zealand. Chile or Argentina you might think
differently. Of course by its nature UV increases effect white people more
than any others so perhaps you favour this form of genocide.

Bookshelves are rarely weighted down with science books which don’t sell
well or make much profit. Scientists are not saints but don’t crave riches
but rather the respect of their peers. In this they are like the military-
at least in Western countries who put inordinate value on non monetary
rewards like medals.
Just a few penguins?

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12535025/

Shows the doubling of skin cancer rates as the Antarctic ozone hole grew.


  #14  
Old October 26th 17, 10:19 PM posted to sci.astro.amateur
Gutless Umbrella Carrying Sissy[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 117
Default Ozone layer recovery could be delayed by 30 years

Mike Collins wrote in

nal-september.org:

RichA wrote:
On Tuesday, 24 October 2017 00:24:41 UTC-4, Gutless Umbrella
Carrying Sissy wrote:
RichA wrote in
:

On Sunday, October 22, 2017 at 3:08:48 PM UTC-4, Gutless
Umbrella Carrying Sissy wrote:
RichA wrote in
:

On Thursday, 12 October 2017 21:10:24 UTC-4, StarDust
wrote:
http://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-41585552

I thought, this problem is solved?

It's over the Antarctic, so who cares? Deranged greenies
going to fret over penguins getting skin cancer?

At the height of the scare, the absolute *worst* case
prediction of the destruction of the ozone laywer was an
increase in UV radiation that was the equivalent of moving
from Norway to the Mediterranean coast.

--

The same chicken-little kooks who wrote that have a ZERO
prediction accuracy rate over the last 50 years. Like oil
running out, mass starvation by 1980, etc. Shouldn't let
anthropologists and sociologists with degrees from left-wing,
second-tier universities dictate policies.

They've done very well at the only prediction that really
matters:

"If I scare people with this fake prediction, I'll sell a lot
of copies of my book. And since nothing bad will happen, next
year, I can write another book and do it all again."


The bookshelves are weighted-down with quackery and ideas aimed
at mediocre minds and worse, horribly gullible people.



Your anti science ignorance is startling.


Your ability to swallow snake oil suggests you have a lot of
experience at shoving large objects down your throat. Maybe it'll
makey ou less constipated.

--
Terry Austin

Vacation photos from Iceland:
https://plus.google.com/u/0/collection/QaXQkB

"Terry Austin: like the polio vaccine, only with more asshole."
-- David Bilek

Jesus forgives sinners, not criminals.

  #15  
Old October 27th 17, 01:28 AM posted to sci.astro.amateur
Mike Collins[_4_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,727
Default Ozone layer recovery could be delayed by 30 years

Gutless Umbrella Carrying Sissy wrote:
Mike Collins wrote in

nal-september.org:

RichA wrote:
On Tuesday, 24 October 2017 00:24:41 UTC-4, Gutless Umbrella
Carrying Sissy wrote:
RichA wrote in
:

On Sunday, October 22, 2017 at 3:08:48 PM UTC-4, Gutless
Umbrella Carrying Sissy wrote:
RichA wrote in
:

On Thursday, 12 October 2017 21:10:24 UTC-4, StarDust
wrote:
http://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-41585552

I thought, this problem is solved?

It's over the Antarctic, so who cares? Deranged greenies
going to fret over penguins getting skin cancer?

At the height of the scare, the absolute *worst* case
prediction of the destruction of the ozone laywer was an
increase in UV radiation that was the equivalent of moving
from Norway to the Mediterranean coast.

--

The same chicken-little kooks who wrote that have a ZERO
prediction accuracy rate over the last 50 years. Like oil
running out, mass starvation by 1980, etc. Shouldn't let
anthropologists and sociologists with degrees from left-wing,
second-tier universities dictate policies.

They've done very well at the only prediction that really
matters:

"If I scare people with this fake prediction, I'll sell a lot
of copies of my book. And since nothing bad will happen, next
year, I can write another book and do it all again."


The bookshelves are weighted-down with quackery and ideas aimed
at mediocre minds and worse, horribly gullible people.



Your anti science ignorance is startling.


Your ability to swallow snake oil suggests you have a lot of
experience at shoving large objects down your throat. Maybe it'll
makey ou less constipated.


Your gutless use of snipping is showing again. It allows you to re-insert
your head in the sand and ignore the real world.

If you lived in Australia, New Zealand. Chile or Argentina you might think
differently. Of course by its nature UV increases effect white people more
than any others so perhaps you favour this form of genocide.

Bookshelves are rarely weighted down with science books which don’t sell
well or make much profit. Scientists are not saints but don’t crave riches
but rather the respect of their peers. In this they are like the military-
at least in Western countries who put inordinate value on non monetary
rewards like medals.
Just a few penguins?

If you lived in Australia, New Zealand. Chile or Argentina you might think
differently. Of course by its nature UV increases effect white people more
than any others so perhaps you favour this form of genocide.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12535025/

Carry on ignoring the science.

By the way your anal/rectal fixation is showing again.


  #16  
Old October 27th 17, 02:13 AM posted to sci.astro.amateur
Gutless Umbrella Carrying Sissy[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 117
Default Ozone layer recovery could be delayed by 30 years

Mike Collins wrote in

rnal-september.org:

Gutless Umbrella Carrying Sissy wrote:
Mike Collins wrote in

ter nal-september.org:

RichA wrote:
On Tuesday, 24 October 2017 00:24:41 UTC-4, Gutless Umbrella
Carrying Sissy wrote:
RichA wrote in
:

On Sunday, October 22, 2017 at 3:08:48 PM UTC-4, Gutless
Umbrella Carrying Sissy wrote:
RichA wrote in
:

On Thursday, 12 October 2017 21:10:24 UTC-4, StarDust
wrote:
http://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-41585552

I thought, this problem is solved?

It's over the Antarctic, so who cares? Deranged greenies
going to fret over penguins getting skin cancer?

At the height of the scare, the absolute *worst* case
prediction of the destruction of the ozone laywer was an
increase in UV radiation that was the equivalent of moving
from Norway to the Mediterranean coast.

--

The same chicken-little kooks who wrote that have a ZERO
prediction accuracy rate over the last 50 years. Like oil
running out, mass starvation by 1980, etc. Shouldn't let
anthropologists and sociologists with degrees from
left-wing, second-tier universities dictate policies.

They've done very well at the only prediction that really
matters:

"If I scare people with this fake prediction, I'll sell a
lot of copies of my book. And since nothing bad will happen,
next year, I can write another book and do it all again."


The bookshelves are weighted-down with quackery and ideas
aimed at mediocre minds and worse, horribly gullible people.



Your anti science ignorance is startling.


Your ability to swallow snake oil suggests you have a lot of
experience at shoving large objects down your throat. Maybe
it'll makey ou less constipated.


Your gutless use of snipping is showing again.


When you start off with namecalling, there isn't any point in
reading the rest. So I didn't.

You have loudly proclaimed you have nothing to say, and you're
going to keep saying it.

I can, after all, only comment on what I see. And what I see is a
loser.

--
Terry Austin

Vacation photos from Iceland:
https://plus.google.com/u/0/collection/QaXQkB

"Terry Austin: like the polio vaccine, only with more asshole."
-- David Bilek

Jesus forgives sinners, not criminals.
  #17  
Old October 27th 17, 05:14 PM posted to sci.astro.amateur
Razzmatazz
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 242
Default Ozone layer recovery could be delayed by 30 years

On Thursday, October 26, 2017 at 4:19:14 PM UTC-5, Gutless Umbrella Carrying Sissy wrote:
Mike Collins wrote in

nal-september.org:

RichA wrote:
On Tuesday, 24 October 2017 00:24:41 UTC-4, Gutless Umbrella
Carrying Sissy wrote:
RichA wrote in
:

On Sunday, October 22, 2017 at 3:08:48 PM UTC-4, Gutless
Umbrella Carrying Sissy wrote:
RichA wrote in
:

On Thursday, 12 October 2017 21:10:24 UTC-4, StarDust
wrote:
http://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-41585552

I thought, this problem is solved?

It's over the Antarctic, so who cares? Deranged greenies
going to fret over penguins getting skin cancer?

At the height of the scare, the absolute *worst* case
prediction of the destruction of the ozone laywer was an
increase in UV radiation that was the equivalent of moving
from Norway to the Mediterranean coast.

--

The same chicken-little kooks who wrote that have a ZERO
prediction accuracy rate over the last 50 years. Like oil
running out, mass starvation by 1980, etc. Shouldn't let
anthropologists and sociologists with degrees from left-wing,
second-tier universities dictate policies.

They've done very well at the only prediction that really
matters:

"If I scare people with this fake prediction, I'll sell a lot
of copies of my book. And since nothing bad will happen, next
year, I can write another book and do it all again."


The bookshelves are weighted-down with quackery and ideas aimed
at mediocre minds and worse, horribly gullible people.



Your anti science ignorance is startling.


Your ability to swallow snake oil suggests you have a lot of
experience at shoving large objects down your throat. Maybe it'll
makey ou less constipated.


You certainly put out your share of snake oil in another post about electric vehicles. In fact it was a bald faced lie.

Razzy
  #18  
Old October 29th 17, 04:17 AM posted to sci.astro.amateur
Gutless Umbrella Carrying Sissy[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 117
Default Ozone layer recovery could be delayed by 30 years

Razzmatazz wrote in
:

On Thursday, October 26, 2017 at 4:19:14 PM UTC-5, Gutless
Umbrella Carrying Sissy wrote:
Mike Collins wrote in

ter nal-september.org:

RichA wrote:
On Tuesday, 24 October 2017 00:24:41 UTC-4, Gutless Umbrella
Carrying Sissy wrote:
RichA wrote in
:

On Sunday, October 22, 2017 at 3:08:48 PM UTC-4, Gutless
Umbrella Carrying Sissy wrote:
RichA wrote in

:

On Thursday, 12 October 2017 21:10:24 UTC-4, StarDust
wrote:
http://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-41585552

I thought, this problem is solved?

It's over the Antarctic, so who cares? Deranged greenies
going to fret over penguins getting skin cancer?

At the height of the scare, the absolute *worst* case
prediction of the destruction of the ozone laywer was an
increase in UV radiation that was the equivalent of
moving from Norway to the Mediterranean coast.

--

The same chicken-little kooks who wrote that have a ZERO
prediction accuracy rate over the last 50 years. Like oil
running out, mass starvation by 1980, etc. Shouldn't let
anthropologists and sociologists with degrees from
left-wing, second-tier universities dictate policies.

They've done very well at the only prediction that really
matters:

"If I scare people with this fake prediction, I'll sell a
lot of copies of my book. And since nothing bad will
happen, next year, I can write another book and do it all
again."


The bookshelves are weighted-down with quackery and ideas
aimed at mediocre minds and worse, horribly gullible people.



Your anti science ignorance is startling.


Your ability to swallow snake oil suggests you have a lot of
experience at shoving large objects down your throat. Maybe
it'll makey ou less constipated.


You certainly put out your share of snake oil in another post
about electric vehicles. In fact it was a bald faced lie.

I know you are, but what am I?

--
Terry Austin

Vacation photos from Iceland:
https://plus.google.com/u/0/collection/QaXQkB

"Terry Austin: like the polio vaccine, only with more asshole."
-- David Bilek

Jesus forgives sinners, not criminals.
  #19  
Old October 29th 17, 06:35 AM posted to sci.astro.amateur
Chris.B[_3_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 798
Default Ozone layer recovery could be delayed by 30 years

On Sunday, 29 October 2017 04:17:36 UTC+1, Gutless Umbrella Carrying Sissy wrote:
Razzmatazz wrote in


You certainly put out your share of snake oil in another post
about electric vehicles. In fact it was a bald faced lie.

I know you are, but what am I?

Terry Austin


A deluded parrot?


  #20  
Old October 29th 17, 08:48 AM posted to sci.astro.amateur
Gutless Umbrella Carrying Sissy[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 117
Default Ozone layer recovery could be delayed by 30 years

"Chris.B" wrote in
:

On Sunday, 29 October 2017 04:17:36 UTC+1, Gutless Umbrella
Carrying Sissy wrote:
Razzmatazz wrote in


You certainly put out your share of snake oil in another post
about electric vehicles. In fact it was a bald faced lie.

I know you are, but what am I?

Terry Austin


A deluded parrot?

I know you are, but what am I?

--
Terry Austin

Vacation photos from Iceland:
https://plus.google.com/u/0/collection/QaXQkB

"Terry Austin: like the polio vaccine, only with more asshole."
-- David Bilek

Jesus forgives sinners, not criminals.
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Asteroid crash would devastate ozone layer Sam Wormley[_2_] Amateur Astronomy 6 October 17th 10 06:53 AM
GRBs might not destroy the ozone layer after all... dlzc Astronomy Misc 0 June 16th 08 05:57 PM
NASA, NOAA Data Indicate Ozone Layer Is Recovering Thomas Lee Elifritz Policy 1 September 7th 06 06:42 PM
NASA, NOAA Data Indicate Ozone Layer Is Recovering Stephen Horgan Policy 0 September 7th 06 11:16 AM
Do NASA's engines destroy the Ozone Layer Jim Norton Space Shuttle 1 September 27th 03 12:00 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:02 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright 2004-2017 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.