If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. 


Thread Tools  Display Modes 
#1




New Physics: Frequency and Speed of Light Vary Proportionally
Doppler effect (moving observer):
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bg7O4rtlwEE Two obvious facts in the above scenario: 1. The wavelength (distance between light pulses) is constant. 2. The frequency and the speed of the light pulses vary proportionally for the moving observer. One might say that the two facts are only relevant for this particular scenario, but no, they are universally valid. Generalised over all possible scenarios, the two facts become, respectively, the fundamental axiom and the fundamental law of future, Einsteinfree physics: The wavelength of light is constant (for a given emitter). Any frequency shift entails (is caused by) a proportional speedoflight shift. It is easy to see that the fundamental axiom and the fundamental law of Einsteinfree physics are obeyed he University of Illinois at UrbanaChampaign: "Consider a falling object. ITS SPEED INCREASES AS IT IS FALLING. Hence, if we were to associate a frequency with that object the frequency should increase accordingly as it falls to earth. Because of the equivalence between gravitational and inertial mass, WE SHOULD OBSERVE THE SAME EFFECT FOR LIGHT. So lets shine a light beam from the top of a very tall building. If we can measure the frequency shift as the light beam descends the building, we should be able to discern how gravity affects a falling light beam. This was done by Pound and Rebka in 1960. They shone a light from the top of the Jefferson tower at Harvard and measured the frequency shift. The frequency shift was tiny but in agreement with the theoretical prediction. Consider a light beam that is travelling away from a gravitational field. Its frequency should shift to lower values. This is known as the gravitational red shift of light." https://courses.physics.illinois.edu...re13/L13r.html See more he https://twitter.com/pentcho_valev Pentcho Valev 
Ads 
#2




New Physics: Frequency and Speed of Light Vary Proportionally
The formula
(frequency) = (speed of light) / (wavelength) allows the introduction of two axioms that push physics in opposite directions: Axiom 1 (killed physics  converted it into an insane ideology): The speed of light is constant. Immediate corollary (obviously absurd): Any frequency shift entails (is caused by) an inversely proportional wavelength shift. Axiom 2 (will resurrect physics if itâ€™s not too late): The wavelength of light is constant (for a given emitter). Immediate corollary: Any frequency shift entails (is caused by) a proportional speedoflight shift. Five important corollaries of Axiom 2: Corollary 1 (the fundamental law of future physics): Any frequency shift entails (is caused by) a proportional speedoflight shift. Corollary 2: If the emitter and the observer (receiver) travel towards each other with relative speed v, the speed of light as measured by the observer is c' = c+v, as per Newton's theory. Corollary 3: Spacetime and gravitational waves (ripples in spacetime) don't exist. LIGO's "discoveries" are fakes. Corollary 4: Light falls in a gravitational field with the same acceleration as ordinary falling bodies  near Earth's surface the accelerations of falling photons is g = 9.8 m/s^2. Accordingly, there is no gravitational time dilation  Einstein's general relativity is nonsense. Corollary 5: The Hubble redshift is due to light slowing down as it travels through vacuum. The universe is static, not expanding. More he https://twitter.com/pentcho_valev Pentcho Valev 
#3




New Physics: Frequency and Speed of Light Vary Proportionally
The fundamental axiom of future, Einsteinfree physics:
The wavelength of light is constant (for a given emitter). Is the axiom correct? Judging from the three scenarios below, it is: (A) The observer starts moving relative to the emitter https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bg7O4rtlwEE. The wavelength (distance between light pulses) obviously remains constant while the frequency and the speed of the pulses vary proportionally for the moving observer, in violation of Einstein's relativity. (B) The emitter starts moving relative to the observer https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xsVxC_NR64M. It is universally taught that the wavelength of light varies with the speed of the emitter, as shown in the video, but this contradicts the principle of relativity. If the wavelength varied, the emitter would measure it regularly, inside his spaceship, and so he would be able to calculate his speed without looking outside. The wavelength of light is constant, independent of the speed of the emitter. (C) Light falls in a gravitational field. The frequency and the speed of falling light vary proportionally, and accordingly the wavelength remains constant. This is clearly shown he University of Illinois at UrbanaChampaign: "Consider a falling object. ITS SPEED INCREASES AS IT IS FALLING. Hence, if we were to associate a frequency with that object the frequency should increase accordingly as it falls to earth. Because of the equivalence between gravitational and inertial mass, WE SHOULD OBSERVE THE SAME EFFECT FOR LIGHT. SO lets shine a light beam from the top of a very tall building. If we can measure the frequency shift as the light beam descends the building, we should be able to discern how gravity affects a falling light beam. This was done by Pound and Rebka in 1960. They shone a light from the top of the Jefferson tower at Harvard and measured the frequency shift. The frequency shift was tiny but in agreement with the theoretical prediction. Consider a light beam that is travelling away from a gravitational field. Its frequency should shift to lower values. This is known as the gravitational red shift of light." https://courses.physics.illinois.edu...re13/L13r.html "To see why a deflection of light would be expected, consider Figure 217, which shows a beam of light entering an accelerating compartment. Successive positions of the compartment are shown at equal time intervals. Because the compartment is accelerating, the distance it moves in each time interval increases with time. The path of the beam of light, as observed from inside the compartment, is therefore a parabola. But according to the equivalence principle, there is no way to distinguish between an accelerating compartment and one with uniform velocity in a uniform gravitational field. We conclude, therefore, that A BEAM OF LIGHT WILL ACCELERATE IN A GRAVITATIONAL FIELD AS DO OBJECTS WITH REST MASS. For example, near the surface of Earth light will fall with acceleration 9.8 m/s^2." http://web.pdx.edu/~pmoeck/books/Tipler_Llewellyn.pdf See https://twitter.com/pentcho_valev Pentcho Valev 
Thread Tools  
Display Modes  


Similar Threads  
Thread  Thread Starter  Forum  Replies  Last Post 
Einstein's Physics: Constant Speed of Light. EinsteinFree Physics:Constant Wavelength of Light  Pentcho Valev  Astronomy Misc  1  August 10th 20 07:55 PM 
Wavelength of Light Does Not Vary with Speed of the Emitter  Pentcho Valev  Astronomy Misc  1  March 25th 19 10:33 AM 
Wavelength, Frequency and Variable Speed of Light  Pentcho Valev  Astronomy Misc  1  April 8th 16 11:59 PM 
HOW DOES THE SPEED OF LIGHT VARY IN GRAVITY, EINSTEINIANS ?  Pentcho Valev  Astronomy Misc  3  August 28th 14 02:50 PM 
Is the speed of light frequencydependent?  Pentcho Valev  Astronomy Misc  0  December 30th 08 09:01 AM 