|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Chapt1 What is this theory #10 Atom Totality Theory replacing BigBang theory
I suppose one can say that the difference between the Big Bang and Atom Totality theory is that although both are theories for the entire Universe, that the Big Bang is a theory of a "process going on" , while the Atom Totality is a theory of a entity or something, and how that entity existed in the past and will exist in the future. No explosion is needed in the Atom Totality theory, for as described in a later chapter, Paul Dirac shows how a process of new- radioactivities dominates in the creation of the Universe. The Big Bang theory is like saying that Nagasaki is an explosion, rather than a city that existed before the explosion and a city that exists after. Whereas the Atom Totality would recognize the city when it first was settled and where a explosion was just one day in the history of the city. So the Big Bang as a theory of Physics is really a paltry piece of imagination rather than a solid thoughtful theory. But the worst reasoning of the Big Bang is that it has to violate all the laws of physics until much later in the explosion that all of a sudden the laws of physics seem to precipitate out of the explosion. So that Quantum Mechanics comes into existence about 5 minutes after the explosion and perhaps Maxwell Equations come into existence some days after the explosion. All of which is random, capricious and piecemeal. So that only a scatterbrained physicist would be tempted to buy into the Big Bang theory for what sense is there in a theory of physics that destroys universal laws of physics and then creates another batch of so called "universal laws" when they were never universal in the first place. On the other hand, the Atom Totality theory sticks and stays with Quantum Mechanics. Atoms are Quantum Mechanics and so in the Atom Totality, never is there a breakdown of the laws of physics and the laws are truly universal. Now a big explosion can occur in an Atom Totality for we can witness cosmic gamma ray bursts that hold the energy of an entire galaxy. However, in the Atom Totality theory, the Cosmos is a atom-like-machine that is interested in creating the next higher element atom, so that violence and destruction is not part of the Cosmic whole but rather a beneficial process leading into the Plutonium Atom Totality at present to go into the next heavier element Atom Totality of the future. So, in the Big Bang the universe is not a entity, not a something, but rather a amorphous process. A process that started in violence and has only two choices of a future-- thin out into nothing or return to a violent big crunch. In the Atom Totality theory, the only things in existence are atoms which keep the process going by creating Atom Totalities of higher number and ordered atoms. In an Atom Totality, life has meaning as a developer of the new atoms, whereas in a Big Bang, life is only a fluke of probability, sitting there along for the ride as to whatever that ride may end up being. In the Atom Totality, the Universe is a atom of which it was borne or risen from previous atoms and the future is a transformation into a higher numbered atom. Where the Universe is an "it" a "something" and it includes processes and transformations. Whereas the Big Bang is only a process. Now probably, the only reason that so many scientist accepted and believed in the Big Bang, is what happens in all fields of study, when there is only one theory and no rival theory to contend or compete with, well, most scientists will then blindly accept a scatterbrained theory. When the only drink in town is bad water, then you drink bad water. But when someone digs a well and runs the water through a purifier, then you have a choice of what to drink. Archimedes Plutonium http://www.iw.net/~a_plutonium/ whole entire Universe is just one big atom where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
5th ed. book, Chapt.1 What is this Theory? ; #6; ATOM TOTALITY (AtomUniverse) replaces Big Bang theory | Archimedes Plutonium[_2_] | Astronomy Misc | 5 | September 26th 11 07:35 AM |
Chapt 15 MECO theory replacing black-holes #307 ATOM TOTALITY,ONE-ATOM-UNIVERSE theory | Archimedes Plutonium[_2_] | Astronomy Misc | 0 | November 17th 10 05:13 AM |
4th ed. book, preface #1; ATOM TOTALITY (Atom Universe) theory;replaces Big Bang theory | Archimedes Plutonium[_2_] | Astronomy Misc | 176 | June 9th 10 05:43 AM |
Redshift and Microwave radiation favor Atom Totality and disfavorBig Bang #9; ATOM TOTALITY (Atom Universe) theory; replaces Big Bang theory | Net-Teams, | Astronomy Misc | 1 | May 31st 10 05:19 PM |
MECO theory reinforced by Atom Totality theory #48 ;3rd edition book:ATOM TOTALITY (Atom Universe) THEORY | [email protected] | Astronomy Misc | 2 | May 21st 09 07:51 PM |