Further proof gravity is a push...

jonathan wrote:

What governs the structure of the universe is ultimately due to
dynamic attractor of classical motion formed by the static attractor
of mass in an unstable equilibrium with the chaotic attractor of
cosmic expansion.

Static electricity is holding me down to Earth?

Sam Wormley wrote in message ...
Rick Sobie wrote:

"Sam Wormley" wrote in message ...
Rick Sobie wrote:

Lets suppose, that the moon, was a Dyson sphere, and its power unit failed,
and its orbit began to decay, then it would hit the earth.


Ref: http://scienceworld.wolfram.com/physics/Gravity.html
Ref: Hartle, "Gravity: An Introduction to Einstein's General Relativity", Addison
Wesley (2003)

"A few properties of the gravitational interaction that help explain when
gravity is important can already be seen from the gravitational force law

F_grav = G m_1 m_2 / r_12^2

o Gravity is a universal interaction in Newtonian theory between all mass, and,
since E = mc^2, in relativistic gravity between all forms of energy.

o Gravity is unscreened. There are no negative gravitational charges to cancel
positive ones, and therefore it is not possible to shield (screen) the gravitational
interaction. Gravity is always attractive.


Excuse me?

Tell me how gravity is an attractive force....

You can test this a number of ways
o astronomical observation involving motions of heavenly bodies
o replicate Cavendish experiments
o slip on the ice
o jump off a cliff
---------------------
yess you can dio all that but that is not enough
at least for me
because :
we do not know the actual physical mechanism behind it
and as long as there will be a solution for yhat enigma
there wilol not be real advance in scince
in my opinion force can be done only by collision of those basic particles
(that might be the smallest posible- baecause the fact you mensioned
that gravity is the s,allest force (per unit aria- but huge in huge areas)
now atractive force can never (mho) be done by
sending messengers' in a stright line- because that can do only *repulsion*
there is the mathematical solusion , but that is not the *physical solusion*
the physical solusion can be dome by particles that do not move in a straight
line
(that is why 'curved spce' was *invented* *the assertion on invented is mine
(because i dont believe in curved space space is nothing
the trick' of attraction is in the properties of particles themsels
not all particles are the same properties, from that aspect
there must be a basic particles that :
movws naturally in a curved path *
(that is my second postulate)
i9t moves in a cuved path and hits the acted particle *from behind*
rcoils back ete etc
all th ebest
Y.Porat
------------------